On 2011-Mar-06, at 9:15 AM, Samuel Longiaru wrote:
Hi Dan,
Your procedure sounds pretty similar to mine, and working around Kamloops
likely is equivalent in terms of the kinds of features we see.
It's nice to see that the method I've been following isn't totally out in left
field :-)
Bryan,
I would have to agree with your argument. I have some
knowledge of the forestry GIS that is used here in NB and it would be a
daunting task to include cut blocks in the forest. There is more than enough
OSM work in Canada just getting the road network built it would be
Hi all, just for your information.
The Canvec vegetation layer will be replaced by a state of the art image
classification. It is based on a subset of the GeoBase Land Cover product.
I don't know if cut blocks will be included or excluded of the wooded areas.
Daniel
Good Morning Everyone,
Thanks for the feedback on my question about mapping cut blocks in
wooded areas. I do appreciate it and understand the points that are
being made by Daniel, Bryan and Bernie. I've thought a lot about this,
however, and would like to address some of the points as it
Some more thoughts,
Despite the idealism displayed by mapping cutblocks, I really believe that
this should not become standard practice as there are too many variables at
work that would interfere with the accuracy, and integrity of the dynamic
features in question. Until that can be
One more
My crew and I would sometimes (not often, but sometimes) get lost while
tracking down timber stands or cutblocks because our maps were out of date
and not accurate enough
and we were a local crew. I cant tell how many
times we had to direct southern planting crews and the odd
I've spent the past several hours trying to find out out why some of my edits
resulted in some accidental road removals. I think I've found the problem,
which seems to relate to an apparent bug in JOSM, or at least a preference
somewhere set to something unintuitive that I haven't been able to
Dan...
Have to admit that I VERY rarely if ever use the fix button, and then
only after I've isolated the issue for a specific error or warning. I
do errors first, then warnings. But after each correction, I revalidate
to refresh the list. Maybe that's overkill, but it keeps the exceptions
from
Hi
I've racked up a list of errors is Canvec data. We've probably gone over
this before, but how do I report errors and out of date information in
Canvec.
Sam Dyck
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
No, if I highlight an unnamed way warning, and select it, the fix key is
grayed out. That makes sense.
Sam L.
-Original Message-
From: Samuel Longiaru longi...@shaw.ca
To: Dan Charrois d...@syz.com
Cc: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Did I just
Thats funny, because I submitted a bug just a few hours ago because the
latest (dev) build of Validator + JOSm wouldnt merge duplicate nodes on a
canvec boundary.. Anyways, clearly JOSM is a work in progress,
Russell
On 2011-03-07, at 6:23 PM, Samuel Longiaru longi...@shaw.ca wrote:
No, if I
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Russell P skiinf...@gmail.com wrote:
Thats funny, because I submitted a bug just a few hours ago because the
latest (dev) build of Validator + JOSm wouldnt merge duplicate nodes on a
canvec boundary.. Anyways, clearly JOSM is a work in progress,
Yes, it is
Sam wrote I think you're getting the exceptions because you've
modified the data, but have not updated the list. This is definitely
an issue I have encountered with Validator. If you run the validator
to check for errors, then delete some nodes or ways yourself, then try
to use validator's
Thanks Adam, and everyone else who responded to my message. I'm glad to learn
the bug is repeatable by others - that means I'm not going completely crazy.
Plus, it's nice to have a good understanding now why some of the ways I'd
uploaded had mysteriously disappeared.
I'm glad you were able
14 matches
Mail list logo
