hi,
What do you suggest for admin_level of canadian cities, because i noticed
difference between the official Canadian recommendation on Openstreetmap
wiki (
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Admin_level#10_admin_level_values_for_specific_countries)
witch is suggesting LEVEL 8 ... whereas you
Openstreetmap a annoncé sur son tweeter il y a quelques jour, la
publication de nouvelles cartes détaillées de BING dans certaines regions
du canada je n'ai pas vu de différence à Québec mais peut-être que
St-hilaire n'est plus la seule exception hors de ces deux grandes
villes ;-)
Le 7
Openstreetmap recently annonced on his tweeter , release of brand new high
definition satelite vues of BING in Canada.
So... hope it 'll help you were you're mapping ;-)
--
Bruno Remy
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Bruno,
In the wiki page it is clearly indicated to use admin_level=8 for
municipalities in Canada. Levels 9 and 10 are used for subdivisions into the
municipality (ie. arrondissement and neighborhood / quartiers ).
Pierre
De : Bruno Remy
Effectivement,
comme je le disais dans le message précédent, en anglais, j'ai découvert hier
de nouvelles images pour pratiquement toute la vallée du Richelieu, Bromont et
Sherbrooke.
Ce sont des images de très bonne qualité. Quel plaisir de pouvoir tracer à
partir de ces images. J'ai
I totaly agree with you ! This is CLEAR and completed with several exemple.
And level 8 seems dedicaced to a PROVINCE (Ontario , British Colombia...ans
so on) but NOT for cities (like Quebec city)
So defibitively i suggest:
A polygone with adminlevel=4 for PROVINCE of Quebec
A SINGLE NODE widh
We should not confuse province and municipality levels.
Quebec city has admin_level=8. See node description
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/1781476959
Quebec province has admin_level=4. See Administrative boundary
relationhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/61549
Pierre
Bruno, what you present correspond to the present situation like I indicated
in my last mail that came at same time as yours.
We could also have an administrative boundary relation =8 to describe Quebec
city limits. This is very helpfull to search into cities. I have done that for
Ahh, you’re absolutely correct. I hadn’t noticed that node. The one I was
looking at is http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/30915641, which isn’t
part of any relations. One of these two “Quebec” nodes should probably be
removed and the remaining one added to the provincial relation.
I suggest to keep node 30915641 where content is more accurate. Tag
state_capital is ok. But the tag admin_level=4 should be removed. And I dont
know if capital=yes adds anything.
We should avoid to create duplicates of the tag admin_level and not confuse
about where to place admin_level
Je pourrai ajouter qu'il y a aussi des nouvelles images dans
l'Outaouais : non seulement à Gatineau, mais aussi dans le MRC de
Pontiac (Shawville, Campbell's-Bay), où il n'y avait pas eu des images
à haute resolution avant celles-ci.
La correspondence entre ces images et la carte crée par mes
Excellent !
Bruno Remy
Le 2012-06-14 15:50, Jonathan Crowe jonathan.cr...@gmail.com a écrit :
Je pourrai ajouter qu'il y a aussi des nouvelles images dans
l'Outaouais : non seulement à Gatineau, mais aussi dans le MRC de
Pontiac (Shawville, Campbell's-Bay), où il n'y avait pas eu des images
Don't forget that you can check age at:
http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bing/
and resolution at:
http://ant.dev.openstreetmap.org/bingimageanalyzer/
Hurray! They finally have imagery of Yellowknife available. Well, the
eastern half of Yellowknife at least - not my house. How is it that
people
You're right : i will do so.
Bruno Remy
Le 2012-06-14 15:49, Pierre Béland infosbelas-...@yahoo.fr a écrit :
I suggest to keep node 30915641 where content is more accurate. Tag
state_capital is ok. But the tag admin_level=4 should be removed. And I
dont know if capital=yes adds anything.
14 matches
Mail list logo
