Re: [Talk-ca] Road route relations: network tag

2016-10-29 Thread Martijn van Exel
Hm. Paul noted something similar. It does not sound like there is a clear consensus about how networks should be tagged then. Perhaps more people can weigh in and argue for the one or the other notation. At least the tagging is consistent now, and would be easy to change in bulk if the outcome is

Re: [Talk-ca] Road route relations: network tag

2016-10-29 Thread Stewart C. Russell
On 2016-10-28 10:45 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > It's not documented that way anywhere that I could find. The colon > notation is. Based on the other comments and the documented standards we > started editing based on the spreadsheet. Well, it was here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation

Re: [Talk-ca] Road route relations: network tag

2016-10-29 Thread Martijn van Exel
Looks like these have all been resolved! Thanks all for your help. Martijn van Exel http://mvexel.github.io/ On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > Just ran the overpass query again and we're down to 1421 relations with > underscore network tags, from 2313 yesterday. > > For