Re: [Talk-de] Potlatch and relation handling

2011-12-13 Diskussionsfäden Martin Koppenhoefer
2011/12/13 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net: So there you go, full support for nested and ordered relations. happy to see this (actually I discovered it myself just a few hours ago). Martin, I've long since stopped expecting anything you say to be founded in any form of reality.

Re: [Talk-de] Potlatch and relation handling

2011-12-13 Diskussionsfäden Richard Fairhurst
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: So in the end I am happy that someone recently coded the missing relation support for Potlatch2, but given your statements from previous discussions (as well as you closing relative tickets with won't fix) wasn't really encouraging to think that this has been

Re: [Talk-de] Potlatch and relation handling

2011-12-13 Diskussionsfäden Martin Koppenhoefer
2011/12/13 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net: But I realise that would require you to actually do some work rather than just endlessly, parasitically criticising others' work on the mailing lists. I do not think you have necessarily to be able to code Flash and improve Potlatch to be

Re: [Talk-de] Potlatch and relation handling

2011-12-13 Diskussionsfäden Richard Fairhurst
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: Btw: I am not aware of the concept of parasitical criticism, what do you intent? - reply offlist preferred to keep the noise low Replied offlist. Richard ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-de] Potlatch and relation handling

2011-12-13 Diskussionsfäden Tirkon
Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: Tirkon, I would be grateful if you would stop repeating the claim that there is no support. Hi Richard, The last time I used Potlatch, it did not work. So I changed to JOSM. Because I did not know this for sure I brought this question up at the