Apologies, as a non-German speaker I can only half-follow this
discussion through Google Translate, and I realise it's very rude to
post in English on a German-speaking list. I thought it would
nonetheless be valuable to follow up two points in particular, hope
you don't mind.
Andre
Ralf Otmanns wrote:
Potlatch mag sein ein tolles Tool sein, ein gut gemeintes Tool ...
leider wissen vielleicht 2 % der Leute, die es verwenden, was sie da
tun. Ihr wisst ja, dass gut gemeint das Gegentum zu gut ist. Der
Rest sind wie 4jährige, denen Du Malstifte gibst und sie dann in
(Sorry, tried to send this yesterday but my subscription to talk-de
appeared to have died! Apologies in advance for posting in English.)
Tirkon's claim about Potlatch and relation handling is complete nonsense.
To edit a relation in Potlatch 2:
* select a node or way which is a member of that
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
So in the end I am happy that someone recently coded the
missing relation support for Potlatch2, but given your
statements from previous discussions (as well as you closing
relative tickets with won't fix) wasn't really encouraging to
think that this has been
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Btw: I am not aware of the concept of parasitical criticism, what do
you intent? - reply offlist preferred to keep the noise low
Replied offlist.
Richard
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Stephan Knauss wrote:
Das ist egal. Die Bilder sind sauber. Potlach hat aus irgendwelchen
Gründen beschlossen diese Bereiche zu verschleiern.
You are certifiably insane.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
6 matches
Mail list logo