On 27 February 2013 09:03, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 February 2013 22:08, Aidan McGinley
aidmcgin+openstreet...@gmail.com wrote:
is the actual output that would get loaded onto OSM.
Please don't load this data into OpenStreetMap. It's not a good idea.
1) The source data
I haven't had time to do the analysis yet Robert, I've been focussing on
fixing the issues I've already identified, once they are done I'll do
something more detailed. But at a high level these are the numbers:
95 total buildings with an existing postcode tag (after removing ways
mapped to more
On 28/02/2013 12:27, Aidan McGinley wrote:
12 of these buildings only have the first part of the postcode. All
of these partially match what is output by the script, for example way
5042255 is tagged in OSM as SW15 and the script identifies it as SW15B2U.
Hopefully that's a typo for
Steve, yes you're right that was a typo on my part :)
Here is the full analysis of the problematic ways
61130908 SW2 4RT in OSM vs SW2 4SG from ONS
112682060 in OSM SW1 2SE vs SW1V 2SE from ONS
139941192 in OSM vs SE11 5EN vs SE11 5EF from ONS
116957518 in OSM vs SW1V 1DX vs SW1P 1JQ from ONS
It looks like an edit in the Dartmoor area has caused problems. A large
square chunk of heath is missing with a waterway unnaturally running along
the line of the bottom right of the square.
I've had a quick look but it looks like it's not a quick fix, well at least
not for me. Does anyone want
Jason Cunningham wrote:
It looks like an edit in the Dartmoor area has caused problems. A
large square chunk of heath is missing with a waterway unnaturally
running along the line of the bottom right of the square.
When did it break? Using ITO's OSM mapper it looks like there have been
Hi Jason,
Think I’ve managed to fix the problem.
Looks like a user had split the heath area, and then added a stream tag to
part of it. This stream was actually sat on top of another stream when I
separated them.
Will need to check when the Map updates, might need a little bit of a
Interestingly out of the 95 you also identified 2 postcodes that are
incorrect in OSM... raising the obvious questions:
* How accurate is the data already in OSM?
* Should imports be compared to 100% accuracy or a more realistic measure
of OSM accuracy?
Rob
8 matches
Mail list logo
