On 28/02/2013 12:27, Aidan McGinley wrote:
12 of these buildings only have the first part of the postcode. All
of these partially match what is output by the script, for example way
5042255 is tagged in OSM as SW15 and the script identifies it as SW15B2U.
Hopefully that's a typo for SW152BU?
More importantly, that highlights an enhancement that I'd like to
request: always make sure the two parts of the postcode are separated,
even if they are not in the source data. I think this should be easy, as
the second part is always the last three characters.
--
Steve
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
