On 04/10/14 01:47, Antje (OpenStreetMap) wrote:
Even the Inner ring road is damaged (3124618
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3124618).
This is the only specific one you identified. I assume you are
referring to http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/25784400 which has
the blank
On 04/10/14 09:57, David Woolley wrote:
This was done with iD which has a bad reputation for collateral damage,
and without a sensible commit comment, it is difficult to work out what
was intended, but I suspect that this relatively new editor is not
actually malicious. That might have to be
On 04/10/2014 10:14, David Woolley wrote:
... it is probably a mistaken attempt at personal mapping.
That's what it looked like to me, certainly.
The big problem with relations is that they tend to be subject to
frequent edits, so reverts may fail, because they would take out a
Thanks!
One small but immediate benefit I found, regarding names. In East
London there's an area called Globe Town, and recently I've been
wondering how to place it, since it doesn't have much of an official
existence. Luckily, it is at least labelled on the historic OS map, so
I used it to help
Hi,
On 10/04/2014 12:54 AM, Rob Nickerson wrote:
p.s. If you find these maps useful, please tell me how you're using them
so I can feed this back to Chris at the NLS.
I loaded the map as a JOSM background
map
tag key='name' value='NLS London 1250'/
tag key='type' value='tms'/
Perhaps the principle OSM editors could emit a warning whenever an edit
is undertaken which could invalidate a relation, also noting how many
other ways would be affected. This at least would give mappers a chance
to consider carefully whether they really know what they are doing.
Roger
On
On 04/10/14 21:58, Roger Calvert wrote:
Perhaps the principle OSM editors could emit a warning whenever an edit
is undertaken which could invalidate a relation, also noting how many
other ways would be affected. This at least would give mappers a chance
to consider carefully whether they really
Hi,
On 10/05/2014 01:35 AM, David Woolley wrote:
Note that both of them fix up the relations, by removing the member, so
the relation is never structurally invalid
The API would not allow deleting a way that is still member of a
relation, so relations will (barring API bugs) always be
8 matches
Mail list logo
