On 19 March 2015 at 01:39, Pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com wrote:
So all ABCU road numbers need to be consistently placed
No they don't. We've had the discussion many times before, and in the
UK we don't put C or U refs into the ref tag. This is for good
reasons, as other people have
On 19 March 2015 at 16:31, Ian Caldwell ian1caldwell+...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On 19 March 2015 at 15:54, Pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com wrote:
If map renderers don't want to use C and U numbered roads, that is up to
them to ignore and not for mappers to place in a different field in
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015, Pmailkeey . wrote:
Still makes use of 2 fields but keeps the main field 'tidy'.
You can use whatever field name you want for non-standard usage, as
long as it doesn't interfere with prior art---but you will likely find
chosing something unique is not very useful.
(...As
On 19 March 2015 at 09:39, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 March 2015 at 01:39, Pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com wrote:
So all ABCU road numbers need to be consistently placed
No they don't. We've had the discussion many times before, and in the
UK we don't put C or U
On 19 March 2015 at 15:54, Pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com wrote:
If map renderers don't want to use C and U numbered roads, that is up to
them to ignore and not for mappers to place in a different field in the
database.
But that means that renderers would have to analyse the strings
Hi Dan,
On 19 March 2015 at 08:15, Dan S danstowell+...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-03-19 1:54 GMT+00:00 Pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com:
On 18 March 2015 at 17:54, Ed Loach edlo...@gmail.com wrote:
A wiki search for admin_ref finds
6 matches
Mail list logo
