Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging adjacent barriers on a way

There's also children and people of limited mobility who might not be comfortable walking over the bars. Current British Standards require bypasses for pedestrians and equestrians. Point taken though, we shouldn't tag the cattle grid as foot=no. On 12 March 2017 at 12:28, Brad Rogers

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging adjacent barriers on a way

On Sun, 12 Mar 2017 11:28:41 + Philip Barnes wrote: Hello Philip, >horses, I as a walker tend to walk over the grid, in my nearly 30 years >as a rambler I have never know anyone to open a gate in these cases. Like you, I cross the grid (it takes time to open & close a

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging adjacent barriers on a way

On 12/03/2017 10:50, Adam Snape wrote: In all these cases is it best to divide the highway into separate ways at these points and apply the relevant barriers to the separate ways? This is the best & most detailed way, although I confess if both barriers are gates, & I'm feeling a bit lazy, I

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging adjacent barriers on a way

On Sun, 2017-03-12 at 10:50 +, Adam Snape wrote: > How should we tag a situation where there are different > adjacent barriers affecting different users of a highway? These are > often used where there is some public access but public vehicular use > ifs restricted. To provide some examples: >

[Talk-GB] Tagging adjacent barriers on a way

How should we tag a situation where there are different adjacent barriers affecting different users of a highway? These are often used where there is some public access but public vehicular use ifs restricted. To provide some examples: 1.A stile next to a locked vehicular gate (a public footpath