Hi Dave,
Thanks for answering my original router logic question! :-)
On 03/10/2020 17:52, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
I've just tested in JOSM. It flagged no such validation warning.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/3403352
Interesting - you're right, I couldn't easily reproduce the 'Sharp
About the only change I've made in years of mapping 'non-mini'
roundabouts is to split the oneway=yes flare 'V' into two segments.
JOSM validation started flagging the junction node of the V as too
tight a bend, which I suppose makes sense.
This is a good example of how routing is
On Sat, 2020-10-03 at 18:36 +0200, Colin Smale wrote:
> On 2020-10-03 18:16, Tom Hughes via Talk-GB wrote:
> > On 03/10/2020 16:57, Philip Barnes wrote:
> >
> >
> > > They are intended to stop this type of routing
> > >
On 2020-10-03 18:16, Tom Hughes via Talk-GB wrote:
> On 03/10/2020 16:57, Philip Barnes wrote:
>
>> They are intended to stop this type of routing
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car=52.64994%2C-1.20491%3B52.64983%2C-1.2049
>>
>> Which is techincally not illegal
On 03/10/2020 16:57, Philip Barnes wrote:
They are intended to stop this type of routing
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car=52.64994%2C-1.20491%3B52.64983%2C-1.2049
Which is techincally not illegal and in real world usage is not going to
happen.
But unless the
On Sat, 2020-10-03 at 16:50 +0100, Tom Hughes via Talk-GB wrote:
> On 03/10/2020 14:05, Brian Prangle wrote:
>
> > There seems to be a predilection for adding turn restrictions ,
> > either
> > no right rurns or no U turns at the exit flares of roundabouts to
> > prevent turning back into the
Hi,
On 03/10/2020 14:05, Brian Prangle wrote:
There seems to be a predilection for adding turn restrictions , either
no right rurns or no U turns at the exit flares of roundabouts to
prevent turning back into the entry flares where there are no explicit
signed restrictions. I suspect this is
On 03/10/2020 14:05, Brian Prangle wrote:
There seems to be a predilection for adding turn restrictions , either
no right rurns or no U turns at the exit flares of roundabouts to
prevent turning back into the entry flares where there are no explicit
signed restrictions. I suspect this is
Where I've seen them they're on every exit
On Sat, 3 Oct 2020, 15:49 Dave F via Talk-GB,
wrote:
> There is a lot of garbage in OSM due to those creating routers being too
> lazy to write a few lines of code, or even use common sense.
>
> However, in this case I believe it's other contributors
There is a lot of garbage in OSM due to those creating routers being too
lazy to write a few lines of code, or even use common sense.
However, in this case I believe it's other contributors who think, for
reasons that escape me, routers require it.
Routing software must be of a poor standard
On Sat, 2020-10-03 at 14:05 +0100, Brian Prangle wrote:
> Hi
>
> There seems to be a predilection for adding turn restrictions ,
> either no right rurns or no U turns at the exit flares of roundabouts
> to prevent turning back into the entry flares where there are no
> explicit signed
Hi
There seems to be a predilection for adding turn restrictions , either no
right rurns or no U turns at the exit flares of roundabouts to prevent
turning back into the entry flares where there are no explicit signed
restrictions. I suspect this is "rendering for routers". Do routers
actually
12 matches
Mail list logo
