On 2018-07-10 2:00 PM, Mark Goodge wrote:
ESRI's free maps can be accessed as server-side tiles. See
Leaflet-providers for some examples:
https://leaflet-extras.github.io/leaflet-providers/preview/
I'm not sure of the licence restrictions which apply to them, or any
rate limits. But, from a
On 2018-07-10 12:30 PM, Mark Goodge wrote:
I think it's a positive. One of the biggest issues with large-scale
use of OSM is that OSM's own tile server isn't suited for high-volume
use, but most of the alternative tile servers are rate-limited and
require payment for larger volumes. If
On 3/8/2018 1:28 PM, SK53 wrote:
Remarks about individual items to be added which I have examined
(mainly, I thin, for Ilya's benefit):
Were the 8 errors from the full set of 400, or a subsample of them?
___
Talk-GB mailing list
On 11/3/2017 10:51 AM, Ilya Zverev wrote:
Philip, the shell.co.uk website gives the same opening hours for the Branting
Hill station as the source dataset. Basically, everything in the dataset is the
same, except for locations, which have been improved by the Navads team.
What percentage of
On 4/27/2017 12:26 PM, Brian Prangle wrote:
Apart from some posts about the problems with email notifications of
changeset discussions, there has been nothing to indicate where I take
this import. I guess that's because the initative is really down to me.
I've annotated Harry's Import wiki
.
More information on local chapters can be found at
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Local_Chapters/FAQ
Paul Norman
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Name & Registered Office:
Openstreetmap Foundation
132 Maney Hill Road
Sutton Coldfield
B72 1JU
United Kingdom
A company limited by guarantee, regist
On 10/28/2016 5:28 AM, Brian Prangle wrote:
There's a small amount of seed funding and we need to size a server
and storage that will serve OSM tiles for the West Midlands
(Geofabrik's download is 37MB for an osm.pbf file). We would need a
production server with an initial guesstimate hit
On 9/14/2016 7:37 AM, Dave F wrote:
From the examples posted it's clear the recent rise is due to the iD
editor's presets.
There have been mentions of OSM Carto and iD presets causing an increase
in place=farm usage.
Support for place=farm was added to the default style on osm.org back in
On 8/5/2016 5:59 AM, Andy Allan wrote:
Our mapping conventions are based on our mappers, not consumers. As
you say, it's easy for the consumers to handle both situations, but
it's harder for mappers to deal with multipolygons-with-one-outer than
just a basic closed way.
Speaking as a data
On 1/10/2016 1:47 PM, Harry Wood wrote:
For an OSMUK website you mean? I have a few ideas about that, and would like to
be involved.
Certainly I'd like to see something done in an openly editable way so it's not too much
of a centralised "request changes from the chief" situation. Code in
On 8/17/2015 3:25 PM, Rob Nickerson wrote:
I'm surprised if this is just England and Wales as I would have
thought some other country has some way of documenting paths in a
legal context and as such this may be relevant for other countries
I'm not aware of any countries which quite have the
On 8/16/2015 1:57 PM, ajt1...@gmail.com wrote:
Until I provided a counter-example there, the only example on
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/747 was of a
well-mapped central European city. If there is evaluation of the
results in both rural and urban settings in
On 8/6/2015 2:07 PM, Antje wrote:
Forking the map style with stronger British road colours and then
getting that forked road style onto the main site once the default
style goes “international”.
After all, we didn’t call it “open” for nothing!
I'd approach this with caution, for two reasons
On 8/5/2014 12:06 AM, Pavlo Dudka wrote:
It seems that the only place not allowed for adding name:** is UK.
That's why I started this discussion here. Should we discuss it
internationaly?
There is a general understanding that name:xx is for the name in the
language xx, not a translation of
if no further action by the mapper.
I've contacted the user. As the import didn't meet some of the basic
consultation/documentation requirements and appears to be cleanly
revertable, I've started a revert.
Paul Norman
For the Data Working Group
___
Talk
On 2014-06-08 1:28 PM, Rob Nickerson wrote:
What would you consider a demonstration of success exactly?
Tom
Tom,
Measuring the success of a bot can be done in the same way that the
success is measured in a statistical model; Type I and Type II errors.
So for example, if the test is to
From: Nick Whitelegg [mailto:nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 4:59 AM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Hobbyist OSM Data Server?
So I'm wondering whether we could, if enough people raise contributions,
have an OSM read only, hobbyist server which could be used to host
From: Paul Norman [mailto:penor...@mac.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 3:03 PM
To: 'SomeoneElse'; talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Editor backbground layers in iD
It's worth pointing out that iD doesn't actually have an imagery list.
It inherits its from the editor
From: SomeoneElse [mailto:li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 4:44 AM
To: Paul Norman; talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Editor backbground layers in iD
Paul Norman wrote:
It's worth pointing out that iD doesn't actually have an imagery list
From: SomeoneElse [mailto:li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk]
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Editor backbground layers in iD
Rob Nickerson wrote:
2). iD is a general purpose editor. It can be used for
OpenHistoricalMap too.
Indeed - perhaps I should have been clearer that I'm talking about the
Unlike the OSM website, the default language for the iD editor is en_US.
Because there are differences between en_US and en_GB, I've had an en_GB
translation added, but translators are needed to fill it out.
Instructions for translating iD are at
21 matches
Mail list logo
