Andy Allan writes:
>
> This mailing list appears to be having some sort of immune-response
> over-reaction. We don't like mechanical edits in general. Fine.
> Therefore every mechanical edit must be fought against, to the bitter
> end. That's an over-reaction.
>
> No, that can't work any more.
Andy, you make some excellent points.
It would be interesting to know how decisions can be made - it seems the
mailing list is no longer representative of editors, and neither is the
wiki
Richard Symonds
Wikimedia UK
0207 065 0992
Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in
Hooray for Andy Allan - some commonsense!
On 18 December 2014 at 13:36, Andy Allan wrote:
>
> On 18 December 2014 at 11:30, SK53 wrote:
> > I personally feel the current discussion is now thrashing.
>
> I personally feel that the opposition to Matthijs' work is becoming
> farcical. After setting
+1
Regards,
Stuart
> On 18 Dec 2014, at 13:36, Andy Allan wrote:
>
> On 18 December 2014 at 11:30, SK53 wrote:
>> I personally feel the current discussion is now thrashing.
>
> I personally feel that the opposition to Matthijs' work is becoming
> farcical. After setting up dozens of hoops for
On 18 December 2014 at 11:30, SK53 wrote:
> I personally feel the current discussion is now thrashing.
I personally feel that the opposition to Matthijs' work is becoming
farcical. After setting up dozens of hoops for him to jump through,
which he has done, and then because he managed that creati
I personally feel the current discussion is now thrashing. We are hearing
repeats of the same things over again, and appear to now be bikeshedding
import and mechanical edit policies.
No-one seems to dispute that we do not have a consensus, Can we leave it at
that "we agree to disagree". It is usu
6 matches
Mail list logo
