17 Dec 2019, 17:58 by silentspike...@gmail.com:
> The `building` tag actually specifies the original purpose or form of the
> building - it just happens that this usually aligns with the current use. As
> such, I think it's fine to leave them tagged as `building=apartments`.
>
I would do
On 17/12/2019 20:54, David Woolley wrote:
On 17/12/2019 20:35, Warin wrote:
so
building=apartments
becomes
disused:building=apartments
or
building=yes
becomes
disused:building=yes
I disagree. It is still a building. In fact some of the most
interesting buildings are disused ones.
On 17/12/2019 20:35, Warin wrote:
so
building=apartments
becomes
disused:building=apartments
or
building=yes
becomes
disused:building=yes
I disagree. It is still a building. In fact some of the most
interesting buildings are disused ones.
___
My understanding?
If the feature is disused then place disused: in front of the existing tag;
so
building=apartments
becomes
disused:building=apartments
or
building=yes
becomes
disused:building=yes
Having both disused:building=* and disused:building=* is a conflict, it
is disused or
The `building` tag actually specifies the original purpose or form of the
building - it just happens that this usually aligns with the current use.
As such, I think it's fine to leave them tagged as `building=apartments`.
See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:use. Interestingly
Change it to building=yes + disused:building=apartments ?...it's still a
building, but the original use is now disused?
- Jez
On Tue, 17 Dec 2019, 14:51 Gareth L, wrote:
> There are some tower blocks near me which have been emptied of residents
> ahead of eventual demolition of the buildings.
There are some tower blocks near me which have been emptied of residents ahead
of eventual demolition of the buildings. They’re not coming back into use due
to issues with their construction.
http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/lzDlWfY8iYo2cUVmO1FNmQ/photo They’re boarded up
to secure them in the
7 matches
Mail list logo
