[Talk-GB] Estimating coverage again

2009-08-18 Thread Peter Reed
I've uncovered and fixed a few errors in my previous estimates of the % of UK roads included on OSM. I discovered a few days ago that there were a few areas where different boundaries overlapped, with the result that I was double counting some roads in more than one local authority. The

[Talk-GB] Estimating coverage

2009-08-11 Thread Peter Reed
I have now uploaded a summary of the figures for the UK coverage estimates as a CSV file here - http://www.reedhome.org.uk/Documents/OSMCoverage.csv Several people have expressed an interest in seeing the proportion of named roads by local authority area. Those figures are included in the

Re: [Talk-GB] Estimating coverage

2009-08-11 Thread Paul Jaggard
Message- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:55:31 +0100 From: Peter Reed peter.r...@aligre.co.uk Subject: [Talk-GB] Estimating coverage I thought that comparing the area enclosed by the admin boundary on OSM with the area published by national statistics would be a good indicator of whether the boundary

Re: [Talk-GB] Estimating coverage

2009-08-11 Thread Donald Allwright
The area figures are obviously including the wet bits. Bristol is half water: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bristol/7019663.stm This article mentions Denny Island - which was absent from OSM. I've now added it from the NPE map, although I don't know whether its location has changed with

Re: [Talk-GB] Estimating coverage

2009-08-11 Thread Peter Reed
Interesting point from Paul (southglos) about slip roads. I've just worked the numbers slightly differently and he seems to be right. Adding up the total length of motorways in England according to DfT it comes to 6,021km. My total from OSM for England = 6,962km On face value we have

Re: [Talk-GB] Estimating coverage

2009-08-11 Thread Nick Austin
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Peter Reedpeter.r...@aligre.co.uk wrote: What do you think – should I be ignoring “motoway_link” in the totals, counting it as something else (and if so what?), do we just put this down to the way DfT count the numbers, or is it just coincidence that the

Re: [Talk-GB] Estimating coverage

2009-08-11 Thread Jennifer Campbell
Nick Austin wrote: There are marker posts every 100 yards alongside the hard shoulder of all motorways. I don't think slip roads have marker posts so if the DfT are calculating distance by counting the marker posts then excluding slip roads sounds a reasonable thing to do. Nick Pedant mode

Re: [Talk-GB] Estimating coverage

2009-08-11 Thread Chris Hill
Peter Reed wrote: Interesting point from Paul (southglos) about slip roads. Ive just worked the numbers slightly differently and he seems to be right. Adding up the total length of motorways in England according to DfT it comes to 6,021km. My total from OSM for England =

Re: [Talk-GB] Estimating coverage

2009-08-04 Thread Emilie Laffray
2009/8/4 Peter Reed peter.r...@aligre.co.uk Meanwhile, there is a nice map on the French Openstreetmap page showing coverage of French Communes http://files.meurisse.org/osm/2009/communes-20090801.png I can read French a little, and I have tried to make out the background from the Talk FR

Re: [Talk-GB] Estimating coverage

2009-08-04 Thread Emilie Laffray
Peter Reed wrote: Thank you Emilie. When you talk of adding a commune, do you mean adding (vectorising) the boundary? It looks as though you have access to a lot more detailed information on boundaries in France than we have in the UK. The UK administrative boundaries on OSM have

Re: [Talk-GB] Estimating coverage

2009-07-20 Thread Martin - CycleStreets
Peter Reed wrote: There have been a number of attempts to estimate the level of UK coverage, of varying levels of sophistication, but I've not seen any that compare the length of roads mapped against actual road lengths. Over the last couple of weeks, I've had a first attempt at doing

[Talk-GB] Estimating coverage

2009-07-19 Thread Peter Reed
There have been a number of attempts to estimate the level of UK coverage, of varying levels of sophistication, but I've not seen any that compare the length of roads mapped against actual road lengths. The Department for Transport publishes statistics on actual road lengths by local

[Talk-GB] Estimating coverage

2009-07-19 Thread Richard Bullock
Of the authorities I have managed to measure, the following all show more road mapped than the DfT believes exists: There could be a number of reasons for this; 1.Our boundaries are plotted from old parish boundaries on NPE typically. I had to move the Trafford/Manchester boundary in a

Re: [Talk-GB] Estimating coverage

2009-07-19 Thread Chris Hill
Peter Reed wrote: Of the authorities I have managed to measure, the following all show more road mapped than the DfT believes exists: Having mapped every road in Hull (Kingston-upon-Hull since today is a Sunday), some are fairly new and may not appear on the DfT figures.

Re: [Talk-GB] Estimating coverage

2009-07-19 Thread Peter Miller
On 19 Jul 2009, at 11:54, Chris Hill wrote: Peter Reed wrote: Of the authorities I have managed to measure, the following all show more road mapped than the DfT believes exists: Having mapped every road in Hull (Kingston-upon-Hull since today is a Sunday), some are fairly new and may

Re: [Talk-GB] Estimating coverage

2009-07-19 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Peter Miller wrote: There is a relation for 'London Boroughs'. I wondered if we should produced one for 'Regions of England', and 'ceremonial counties of England' and add the appropriate relations to them. Generally, relations that just serve the purpose of collecting things are

Re: [Talk-GB] Estimating coverage

2009-07-19 Thread Peter Reed
On the problems with Hampshire - my only related experience is that I had problems with POSTGIS unable to process a number of admin boundaries, because they are plotted with loops in the boundary. I.e. the boundary crosses over itself. This mostly happened where the coast had been added to the

Re: [Talk-GB] Estimating coverage

2009-07-19 Thread Chris Hill
Frederik Ramm wrote: Interestingly I joined this list a while ago because I had got my hands on some admin boundary data for England and wanted to know if it was any good (the answer was no). I then forgot to unsubscribe. I'm still planning to extend the Geofabrik excerpts to cover all

Re: [Talk-GB] Estimating coverage

2009-07-19 Thread Peter Reed
FWIW I've now updated http://www.reedhome.org.uk/Documents/LGboundaries.csv to include a list of local authorities in Scotland, Wales and N. Ireland. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-GB] Estimating coverage

2009-07-19 Thread Richard Bullock
The way I have handled dual carriageways (and motorways) is to assume that both carriageways are plotted separately on OSM. So the figure that results should be twice the length estimated by DfT. However, for primary roads, DfT themselves show the total length of primary road, and the

Re: [Talk-GB] Estimating coverage

2009-07-19 Thread Thomas Wood
2009/7/19 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org: Hi, Peter Miller wrote: There is a relation for 'London Boroughs'. I wondered if we should produced one for 'Regions of England', and 'ceremonial counties of England' and add the appropriate relations to them. Generally, relations that just

Re: [Talk-GB] Estimating coverage

2009-07-19 Thread Richard Bullock
Oh just a thought, does the calculations include toll roads? Do the DfT monitor these in their figures? (M6 toll, Severn Bridge etc.) Yes they do. It's in the notes on the DfT website that private toll roads which form part of major routes are included, but private minor roads are not.