On 28 August 2013 09:50, sk53.osm sk53@gmail.com wrote:
new-fangled expensive wedding licences. Or telling my local vicar and his
wife that they live in a place of worship.
That does rather assume the right building has been marked! I've just
come across a case where the OS have marked
Exactly why OS Street View should only be used as a guide, not gospel.
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 10:21 AM, OpenStreetmap HADW osmh...@gmail.comwrote:
On 28 August 2013 09:50, sk53.osm sk53@gmail.com wrote:
new-fangled expensive wedding licences. Or telling my local vicar and his
wife
The rules for places of worship differ from other amenities in that
there is a strong diktat that only the actual building (where there is
a building) should be tagged. This seems to be partially backed up by
an assumption that all places of worship are medieval churches with
graveyards, so that
OpenStreetmap HADW wrote:
The rules for places of worship
This is OpenStreetMap. We don't have rules. Stop placing so much trust in
the wiki. :)
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
The convention exists because the grounds in which a place of worship
exists are rarely places of worship themselves. Try conducting a marriage
in a churchyard (probably the tag you are looking for
landuse=churchyardhttp://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/landuse=churchyard,
to heavily used but in
On 28 August 2013 09:50, sk53.osm sk53@gmail.com wrote:
churchyard (probably the tag you are looking for landuse=churchyard, to
heavily used but in existence) instead of a church: you need one of the
I was hoping for something with less Christian connotations. Besides
having a zero
Yes, churchyard doesn't work very well for non-Christian sites, and indeed
many christian ones. Quaker meeting houses are not usually described as
churches.
I could live with landuse=religious_precinct, but not precinct per se.
First off our US members will instantly start mapping votiing
7 matches
Mail list logo
