You could also consider at Simple 3D buildings [1], in which case I
think you'd have 1 building around the entire footprint and 3
building:parts.
Cj
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_buildings
___
Talk-GB mailing list
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 18:58, Jez Nicholson wrote:
> Ah yes, a bit like when a hospital or school has a 'corridor room' (for
> lack of a better term) joining two separate buildings. I'd go for three
> joined buildings myself.
>
> And that newer building has been extended a bit more hasn't it?
Ah yes, a bit like when a hospital or school has a 'corridor room' (for
lack of a better term) joining two separate buildings. I'd go for three
joined buildings myself.
And that newer building has been extended a bit more hasn't it? That part I
would merge with the existing building.
On Mon, Oct
It sounds like three connected buildings,
but one building with three building:part
areas also would be acceptable
12 paź 2020, 18:52 od m...@good-stuff.co.uk:
> I was looking at tidying up a few things around my local area, and came
> across this:
>
>
I was looking at tidying up a few things around my local area, and came
across this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.08855/-1.94195
What you can see there is a building labelled "Evesham Hotel" (which is
correct), and, just to the south-west of it, another, unlabelled building.
5 matches
Mail list logo
