Is it not sensible to use the reference format of the place you are in,
rather than create some sudo standard?
If a footpath is in County Durham, and I see OSM has it as ref=Footpath
5, then I know I can call Durham council and say Repair footpath 5
please..
If another footpath is in Newcastle,
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Gregory nomoregra...@googlemail.com wrote:
Is it not sensible to use the reference format of the place you are in,
rather than create some sudo standard?
A web application I'm developing straddles many counties. So I've decided
to adopt the scheme:
On 08/06/2012 16:02, John Sturdy wrote:
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Gregory nomoregra...@googlemail.com wrote:
Is it not sensible to use the reference format of the place you are in,
rather than create some sudo standard?
A web application I'm developing straddles many counties. So I've
On Thu, 31 May 2012, Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
... (This is Worcestershire, and at the same time,
they've also split the paths up at every junction so that no path has
two routes leaving a junction, i.e. a path always ends at the first
junction of rights of way it comes to, and its
Fantastic news about Hamps PRoW data :-) Anyone else contacting their local
council can use this as an example case.
Q: Do we need to have a suggested way of tagging the reference numbers in
ref=* ? So far I have seen the following in use:
* Parish / path no. / link no.== For example:
] PRoW Ref codes (WAS:Hampshire Rights of Way Data
released under OS OpenData licence)
Fantastic news about Hamps PRoW data :-) Anyone else contacting their local
council can use this as an example case.
Q: Do we need to have a suggested way of tagging the reference numbers in ref=*
? So far I
On 31 May 2012 18:03, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
Q: Do we need to have a suggested way of tagging the reference numbers in
ref=* ? So far I have seen the following in use:
* Parish / path no. / link no. == For example: 417/26/1 (where the
parish is a number code)
*
7 matches
Mail list logo
