http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_local_councils
Any path not on these documents by 2026 will no longer be a right of way.
We are hoping to get some of these released under a compatible license so
that we can help identify missing paths.
If we can get the data under an OpenData license...
I am in Oxfordshire where we have permission to use the definitive
statement under OGL (but not the map).
I have used the key prow_ref to add the council reference number for
several paths and tagged them with
designation=public_footpath (or public_bridleway if it's a bridleway) .
See
On 25 January 2014 18:46, SK53 sk53@gmail.com wrote:
Of course it would be much better if everything was released under plain
OGL,
Indeed. Coincidently, it seems that OS is currently running a survey
on the future of OS OpenData. So if anyone would like to let them know
that it would be
Quite agree, this was exactly what I did when I completed the survey.
Failure to get the licence conditions correct shows that its not just users
who find the licences confusing.
On 30 January 2014 13:47, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 January 2014
Hi All,
Okay, I'm going to take a different approach and look at the original
intention of the OS OpenData initiative (ignoring OpenStreetMap). Not that
this relates to the original OS OpenData product.
A) Following public consultation [1]:
Central government has negotiated a commercial
Rob, I think you just did ;-)
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 25/01/2014 16:58, Rob Nickerson wrote:
Any volunteers?
Regards,
Rob
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 24 January 2014 11:00, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com wrote:
If you read to the end of the OGL, you'll find that it helpfully says:
These terms are compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution
License 4.0 and the Open Data Commons Attribution License, both
2014-01-25 Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl:
On 24 January 2014 11:00, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com wrote:
If you read to the end of the OGL, you'll find that it helpfully says:
These terms are compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution
License
I'm no expert, in fact I'm worse than an amateur commenting on legal
matters, I'm an amateur applying common sense to legal matters, but here
goes! ;-)
I would have thought that licensing cascades down, so as long as OSM
attributes OGL then any other uses of OSM are inferring an attribution
Agree, we also have both OGL 1.0 (e.g., Natural England) and OGL 2.0 (e.g,
OSGB).
I've been reading the licenses again, and I think the main sticking point
is the *viral attribution* clause. Thus it may be that we need to check
that Natural England, Norwich County Council etc. are happy with
2014-01-25 SK53 sk53@gmail.com:
Agree, we also have both OGL 1.0 (e.g., Natural England) and OGL 2.0 (e.g,
OSGB).
I've been reading the licenses again, and I think the main sticking point is
the viral attribution clause.
[...snip...]
I don't want to divert from Jerry's main points, but
to a page on the Norfolk CC web site explaining the rights.
http://www.norfolk.gov.uk/Leisure_and_culture/Public_Rights_of_Way/Map/index.htm
Jason (UniEagle)
From: Bernard Moore
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 7:29 AM
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-GB] UK Open Government Licence
Hello
On 24 January 2014 07:29, Bernard Moore bcmo...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Norfolk County Council offer Public Rights of Way data on this page :-
http://maps.norfolk.gov.uk/inspire/ (last row of the NCC block).
It is issued under Open Government Licence :-
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/ …
Hi Robert,
Thanks for that extra info about licensing. I knew OS were at the route
of most licensing issues to do with maps of the UK but not in what way,
so that clears that up for me.
However, my view would be that if a County Council has issued data
under a license that we recognise as
For the sake of clarification:
Robert Whittaker's interpretation of the Ordnance Survey Open Government
License is not widely accepted in the community.
Overall in the past 3 and a half years we have traced, imported or
otherwise derived large quantities of data under this license. Mike
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 11:32:50 +
SK53 sk53@gmail.com wrote:
For the sake of clarification:
Robert Whittaker's interpretation of the Ordnance Survey Open
Government License is not widely accepted in the community.
Overall in the past 3 and a half years we have traced, imported or
On 24 January 2014 11:32, SK53 sk53@gmail.com wrote:
For the sake of clarification:
Robert Whittaker's interpretation of the Ordnance Survey Open Government
License is not widely accepted in the community.
In the light of OS's own interpretation that the OS-ODL is
incompatible with the
I don't think your last point is true: Mike was working to ensure data
created under cc-by-sa could be similarly moved over to ODbL (a different
matter). The relevant point is in this email
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2011-July/011998.htmlto
the list:
* Following my
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 14:25:14 +
SK53 sk53@gmail.com wrote:
I for one prefer to rely on the formal and informal approaches taken
on behalf of OSMF by the LWG. I also defer to the experience of Mike
who has a long experience of running managing organisations
generating and exploiting a
On 24 January 2014 14:25, SK53 sk53@gmail.com wrote:
By all means say OSMf/LWG consider that OSGB OGL data can be included in
OSM, but
I personally avoid doing so ...
But as far I I know, that would be incorrect. According to Michael
Collinson's post at
You need to formally ask: Any other dataset published under the OS
OpenData License by other organisations, such as English Heritage, (or
by OS if any).
is unclear: ask who?
Ask the organisation doing the publishing (eg Norfolk CC), or OS?
My impression of the Mike Collinson dialogue was that
@openstreetmap.org
From: Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com
Date: 24/01/2014 05:48PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] UK Open Government Licence
You need to formally ask: Any other dataset published under the OS
OpenData License by other organisations, such as English Heritage, (or
by OS if any
+1
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 24/01/2014 17:53, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
I think some unambiguous consensus on this needs to be made clear by
the OSMF or whoever - as everyone seems to say different things which
leaves many confused. I will still admit to having no idea as to
whether I can use
Hello,
My first post here so apologies if anything is wrong. I initially asked
this question in the OSM UK Forum but got no response.
Norfolk County Council offer Public Rights of Way data on this page :-
http://maps.norfolk.gov.uk/inspire/ (last row of the NCC block).
It is issued under
24 matches
Mail list logo
