At first look I thought this was a once-hedge, a hedge that's been left to
itself. But each tree is equally spaced, looks the same age, doesn't seem
pollarded or coppiced as what you might expect a tree in a hedge to be, and
so I don't think that's the case now. So to my mind now, it's a fence,
On 28/08/18 04:00, Chris Hill wrote:
On 27/08/2018 18:09, Martin Wynne wrote:
Landuse=highway does have some usage, and certainly the term forbidden
does not exist in OSM.
There is no such thing as available, if you think a new tag is needed
then you can use it.
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 18:09:53 +0100
Martin Wynne wrote:
> the point of adding it to the database? If I put landuse=ufo_landing_pad
> who would ever know that it is in there?
I'm sure that an actual on-the-ground verified UFO landing pad really would be
a valuable addition.
Mike E
--
GPG
On 27/08/2018 18:09, Martin Wynne wrote:
Landuse=highway does have some usage, and certainly the term forbidden
does not exist in OSM.
There is no such thing as available, if you think a new tag is needed
then you can use it.
Landuse=highway does have some usage, and certainly the term forbidden
does not exist in OSM.
There is no such thing as available, if you think a new tag is needed
then you can use it.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landuse%3Dhighway
Hi Phil,
I'm confused. If anyone
On Mon, 2018-08-27 at 15:52 +0100, Martin Wynne wrote:
> > Certainly as clear as mud, a router will should only look on the
> > left
> > side. How is that any different to landuse=railway?
> >
> > Phil (trigpoint)
>
> Hi Phil,
>
> For railways you can have landuse=railway_corridor for sidings
Certainly as clear as mud, a router will should only look on the left
side. How is that any different to landuse=railway?
Phil (trigpoint)
Hi Phil,
For railways you can have landuse=railway_corridor for sidings and other
wide areas inside the railway's boundary fence. But there doesn't
On Mon, 2018-08-27 at 15:29 +0100, Martin Wynne wrote:
> > > What you can't do is have landuse=highway, which would otherwise
> > > be
> > > the most logical way to deal with such areas.
> > >
> >
> > Why not? I agree it is the most logical way of treating these
> > areas.
> >
> > Phil
What you can't do is have landuse=highway, which would otherwise be
the most logical way to deal with such areas.
Why not? I agree it is the most logical way of treating these areas.
Phil (trigpoint)
Hi Phil,
I was told on one of the forums that it was forbidden, because it
affects routing
On Mon, 2018-08-27 at 13:48 +0100, Martin Wynne wrote:
> What you can't do is have landuse=highway, which would otherwise be
> the
> most logical way to deal with such areas.
>
Why not? I agree it is the most logical way of treating these areas.
Phil (trigpoint)
Another instance where this can cause problems is
something like a public square, in many cases these are legally highways
even if they are, at least most of the time, pedestrianised. But you
can't tag an area as a highway, only a way. So you can't tag a public
open space as a highway even if,
On 27/08/18 04:20, Chris Jones wrote:
1) The boundary is is clearly a fence. Thats what stops you just walking across.
Also OSM should not pretend to indicate legal boundaries. In fact, in
the real world, these can be quite fuzzy, as they depend on verbal
descriptions, or rough maps from
On Sun, 2018-08-26 at 20:35 +0100, Martin Wynne wrote:
> Rural boundaries can be extraordinarily difficult to map. For
> example,
> is this:
>
> https://goo.gl/maps/FtjMZiwNj542
>
> a) a fence,
>
> b) a hedge,
>
> c) a very narrow wood,
>
> d) all three at the same time?
>
> Is the area
Hi Martin,
1) The boundary is is clearly a fence. Thats what stops you just walking across.
You can map the trees as several natural : tree or a tree_row depending on how
long the row is I guess. Certainly not a hedge or wood.
2) The road is a highway, the grass is a verge.. the wiki suggests
When someone's appearance is still presentable after being dragged
backwards through one.
DaveF
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 26/08/2018 23:16, Martin Wynne wrote:
Both. It's administratively and legally part of the highway, but it's
the part of the highway which consists of a grass verge.
Thanks Mark.
I think I should map that as
landuse=highway
landcover=grass
However for some inexplicable reason,
Both. It's administratively and legally part of the highway, but it's
the part of the highway which consists of a grass verge.
Thanks Mark.
I think I should map that as
landuse=highway
landcover=grass
However for some inexplicable reason, landuse=highway isn't allowed. I
was told the
On 26/08/2018 20:35, Martin Wynne wrote:
Rural boundaries can be extraordinarily difficult to map. For example,
is this:
https://goo.gl/maps/FtjMZiwNj542
a) a fence,
b) a hedge,
c) a very narrow wood,
d) all three at the same time?
I'd call it a hedgerow. I'm not sure if OSM has a
Rural boundaries can be extraordinarily difficult to map. For example,
is this:
https://goo.gl/maps/FtjMZiwNj542
a) a fence,
b) a hedge,
c) a very narrow wood,
d) all three at the same time?
Is the area in front of it
a) grass,
b) highway,
c) both?
(Not mapping from Google, I walked
19 matches
Mail list logo
