not.
Nick
*From:* Martin Wynne
*Sent:* 29 December 2019 22:52
*To:* talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
*Subject:* Re: [Talk-GB] Which paths are shown on this OS 'Standard'
render
On 29/12/2019 22:23, Andy Townsend wrote:
> Look
From: Martin Wynne
Sent: 29 December 2019 22:52
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Which paths are shown on this OS 'Standard' render
On 29/12/2019 22:23, Andy Townsend wrote:
> Looking elsewhere in a couple of areas I'm familiar with, as w
On 29/12/2019 22:23, Andy Townsend wrote:
Looking elsewhere in a couple of areas I'm familiar with, as well as
missing data, there are plenty of of basic digitisation errors around,
e.g. gardens seeming to be significantly larger then they should be.
This is, I guess, only the free version -
On 29/12/2019 16:43, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
OS have digitised all paths in National Parks and appear to be
gradually digitising
others. But certainly they haven't done the full set of PROWs yet.
Interestingly, just up the road from my previous example is
On 29/12/2019 15:53, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
> https://osmaps.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/
> This OS map render only shows a selection of paths. Does anyone know
> what criteria OS used to decide which to render? Initially, it appears
> random.
OS call that the "Standard Map", which is displayed to
DaveF wrote:
> This OS map render only shows a selection of paths. Does anyone
> know what criteria OS used to decide which to render?
I suspect "only those which OS have got round to digitising". OS have
digitised all paths in National Parks and appear to be gradually digitising
others. But
> I've a contributor who says it's evidence that some PROWS don't existany
> more. They're still shown in Bing's OS Explorer map & in the localauthority's
> digital database.
... and are still on the ground in at least some cases. As I read this I've
just walked past here:
Hi
https://osmaps.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/
This OS map render only shows a selection of paths. Does anyone know
what criteria OS used to decide which to render? Initially, it appears
random.
I've a contributor who says it's evidence that some PROWS don't exist
any more. They're still shown in
8 matches
Mail list logo
