Re: [Talk-GB] traffic calming

Hi, In regards to the traffic calming edit there has only been one comment related to the merits of the actual change - that was me and I approved the edit (Chris I don't think you commented on the edit itself, instead focusing on the matter of mechanical edits?). Does this mean we can now look

[Talk-GB] traffic calming

There has been a discussion on the tagging mailing list triggered by Gerd Petermann having made a mechanical edit to some traffic calming features. I asked him to revert the undiscussed mechanical edit which he has done. He is not subscribed to talk-gb, he asked me to forward a link to his

Re: [Talk-GB] traffic calming

On 22/11/15 19:06, Rob Nickerson wrote: >There has been a discussion on the tagging mailing list triggered by >Gerd Petermann having made a mechanical edit to some traffic calming >features. Thanks Chris, To summarise for those who don't want to get stuck in the tagging mailing list, Gerd

Re: [Talk-GB] traffic calming

On 22/11/2015 19:37, Chris Hill wrote: Mechanical edits need to be discussed. He then indicated that he would discuss the tags on tagging@ - indeed he suggested leaving his edit and discussing it on tagging@. I wanted also to make it clear that tagging@ is not the best place to discuss

Re: [Talk-GB] traffic calming

>There has been a discussion on the tagging mailing list triggered by >Gerd Petermann having made a mechanical edit to some traffic calming >features. Thanks Chris, To summarise for those who don't want to get stuck in the tagging mailing list, Gerd spotted that traffic calming (speed bumps,

Re: [Talk-GB] traffic calming

On 22 November 2015 at 19:33, Chris Hill wrote: > > Gerd did the work you describe but went ahead with an almost nation-wide > mechanical edit without any prior discussion or description. That's why I > asked him to revert it. Mechanical edits need to be discussed. He then >

Re: [Talk-GB] traffic calming

On 22/11/15 20:17, Steve Doerr wrote: On 22/11/2015 19:37, Chris Hill wrote: Mechanical edits need to be discussed. He then indicated that he would discuss the tags on tagging@ - indeed he suggested leaving his edit and discussing it on tagging@. I wanted also to make it clear that tagging@ is

Re: [Talk-GB] traffic calming

On 22/11/2015 20:55, Chris Hill wrote: On a mailing list or IRC channel that relates to the area the mechanical edit is proposed to be. So in a GB-wide edit, talk-GB and #osm-gb makes sense to me. But the amendments to the *tags* aren't GB specific. It needs to be discussed with as wide an