Following on swiftly from Musical Chairs OSM Analaysis is now also
running with the new OS Locator data.
Warwickshire is the biggest gainer/looser with 33 new names; over half
of the districts have got at least one new road and there are now only
8 places still at 100%. We do have 51 at over 99%
On 3 June 2011 11:45, TimSC mapp...@sheerman-chase.org.uk wrote:
Hi all,
Some stats on OSM coverage of Kent. I tried to pair the records of KCC
OpenKent with the OSM database. Assuming the KCC list is complete (which it
is usually, but not entirely), we can estimate OSM's coverage in the
On 08/06/11 08:15, Peter Miller wrote:
My experience is that the LWG never makes definitive statements!
I find that annoying sometimes but, if we are to follow to Spinoza's
example that we should made a ceaseless effort not to [...] scorn human
actions, but to understand them, LWG have to
On 07/06/11 19:18, Steve Coast wrote:
or saturday night
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Board_Meeting_June_2011
Would be awesome to see you there
Steve
With a little bit more notice I would have been able to make it down :(
:(
Cheers
Chris
On 08/06/2011 08:15, Peter Miller wrote:
...
On a separate note. Would you be able to do a comparison between place
names in NatGaz and in OSM. I think we will be surprised how many
places we are still missing from OSM. My guess is that OSM only
contains about 65% of the 50K places in that
On 08/06/2011 07:58, Peter Miller wrote:
Following on swiftly from Musical Chairs OSM Analaysis is now also
running with the new OS Locator data.
Warwickshire is the biggest gainer/looser with 33 new names; over half
of the districts have got at least one new road and there are now only
8
On Wednesday 08 June 2011, Steve Doerr wrote:
I wonder if the good folks at ITO could devise a way to analyse the
not:name tags in the database and see whether any of them are now
redundant? In other words, are the OS correcting any of the mistakes we
appear to have identified?
I don't
Steve Doerr doerr.stephen@... writes:
I wonder if the good folks at ITO could devise a way to analyse the
not:name tags in the database and see whether any of them are now
redundant? In other words, are the OS correcting any of the mistakes we
appear to have identified?
It would be cool to
:-( sorry
Steve
stevecoast.com
On Jun 8, 2011, at 2:14, Chris Fleming m...@chrisfleming.org wrote:
On 07/06/11 19:18, Steve Coast wrote:
or saturday night
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Board_Meeting_June_2011
Would be awesome to see you there
Steve
With a
TimSC wrote:
On 07/06/11 14:37, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
You don't need to put stuff into OSM to make it mashable-uppable. Most
competent licences will have a Collective Work/Database provision to
enable this.
While this this strictly true it is sometimes hard to associate
external records
On 08/06/2011 15:58, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
TimSC wrote:
On 07/06/11 14:37, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
You don't need to put stuff into OSM to make it mashable-uppable. Most
competent licences will have a Collective Work/Database provision to
enable this.
While this this strictly true it is
TimSC wrote:
Straw man.
[...]
Sigh.
[...]
It is ridiculous
[...]
I guess I should not surprised you can't see the benefits
[...]
This seems to be a common thread of your arguments - you make wild claims
Fair enough. It's fairly evident you don't see stuff on the same wavelength
as I do.
On 8 June 2011 07:58, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
Following on swiftly from Musical Chairs OSM Analaysis is now also
running with the new OS Locator data.
Warwickshire is the biggest gainer/looser with 33 new names; over half
of the districts have got at least one new road
The Warwick additions are all names in the defunct Stoneleigh Agricultural
Show site. Must get over there and do a survey to see what's happening to
any redevelopment there - unless anyone else wants to volunteer!
I'm firmly of the opinion that this is not work for a bot unless a tag is
added
Looking at the cyclemap to see if I had made all the changes I thought I had
I noticed the very prominent Knightshayes text on the map
http://www.opencyclemap.org/?zoom=13lat=52.92356lon=-1.12127layers=B0
This is a new housing development which when I added it to the map was still
under
I have finished loading the latest OS CodePoint to create the post code
overlays for England, Scotland and Wales. More info here:
http://codepoint.raggedred.net/
--
Cheers, Chris
user: chillly
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
On 08/06/11 21:20, Brian Prangle wrote:
I'm firmly of the opinion that this is not work for a bot unless a tag
is added such as verified=no so we humans can search for what hasn't
been surveyed.
Wholly agree.
A bot will just replicate the OS errors and then we'll never find them!
Also
Kev,
What I’ve done a couple of times is to create a way encompassing the
development and adding all the relevant details to that. As extra tags along
with landuse=residential usually. I often find that if it’s a one road affair
the new name for the road which comes along late in the
Cool Chris. Are you updating tile rendering for those areas you have
previously made available?
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hill [mailto:o...@raggedred.net]
Sent: 08 June 2011 22:01
To: Talk GB
Subject: [Talk-GB] Code point updates
I have finished loading the latest OS
On 8 June 2011 14:18, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
Steve Doerr doerr.stephen@... writes:
I wonder if the good folks at ITO could devise a way to analyse the
not:name tags in the database and see whether any of them are now
redundant? In other words, are the OS correcting any of the mistakes
On 8 June 2011 09:39, TimSC mapp...@sheerman-chase.org.uk wrote:
On 08/06/11 08:15, Peter Miller wrote:
My experience is that the LWG never makes definitive statements!
I find that annoying sometimes but, if we are to follow to Spinoza's example
that we should made a ceaseless effort not to
On 8 June 2011 21:20, Brian Prangle bpran...@gmail.com wrote:
The Warwick additions are all names in the defunct Stoneleigh Agricultural
Show site. Must get over there and do a survey to see what's happening to
any redevelopment there - unless anyone else wants to volunteer!
I'm firmly of
22 matches
Mail list logo
