On 4 December 2011 18:12, Pawel Stankiewicz sta...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Chances are something very different from a ban. There are also chances that
a satellite will fall on my head but there is no chances to predict every
consequence of any action and only 1 way to verify predictions.
That's
While I agree with much of what has been written here about imports
in general, I feel I should at least comment that what Pawel is
doing is no different to what many others have done in the UK in
mapping their local admin boundaries from the best available sources
(at least I hoping they are his
Ed Loach wrote:
I have seen ... boundaries which follow
rivers merged with less accurate river ways rather than moving the
river tags to the relevant section of the boundary way).
On that specific question, I've seen plenty of places where an imported
GB boundary nearly-but-not-quite
- Original Message -
From: Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, 4 December 2011, 22:39
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Revert my changeset please
Pawel Stankiewicz wrote:
If you don't know how to revert an import, chances are you
You may remember the announcement of the University of Cambridge's
OpenStreetMap project back in July (
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2011-July/012067.html ).
I was appointed to the project from that and I have now written up a bit
about what I'm doing on my OSM diary (
5 matches
Mail list logo
