It's signposted as a bridleway (only the northern section), so it is
technically correct. On the basis of map whatbyou see on the ground, thats
a valid change. So long as it have bicycle=yes, and retains the NCN
information, I don't think it matters that much. Oliver is right though,
use by horses
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 08:09:49PM +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote:
On 13 September 2013 19:59, ael law_ence@ntlworld.com wrote:
No one has mentioned the OS gps (passive) stations: for example
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/472420260
It's rather ironic that that node carries the
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 02:24:31PM +0100, OpenStreetmap HADW wrote:
On 13 September 2013 19:59, ael law_ence@ntlworld.com wrote:
No one has mentioned the OS gps (passive) stations: for example
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/472420260
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 02:24:31PM +0100, OpenStreetmap HADW wrote:
On 13 September 2013 19:59, ael law_ence@ntlworld.com wrote:
No one has mentioned the OS gps (passive) stations: for example
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/472420260
On 15 September 2013 11:27, ael law_ence@ntlworld.com wrote:
It is a few years since I looked at any of this, but it had not occurred
to me that any copyright issue could arise. They are essentially modern
trig points. There is a mark on the ground, and their website publishes
the
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 02:24:31PM +0100, OpenStreetmap HADW wrote:
On 13 September 2013 19:59, ael law_ence@ntlworld.com wrote:
No one has mentioned the OS gps (passive) stations: for example
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/472420260
I'm pretty sure that store locators pages on chain store web sites are
not safe sources, but can someone confirm this.
I've just come across a, recently added feature, purporting to be an
Asda supermarket building, way 237818118. As its only purported
source it quotes the URL of the store
Just forwarding this to talk-gb as well as it is on their patch...
Looks like this is the guilty changeset:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/17850673 [3]
It's the first and only changeset from a user who signed up a year ago.
Can anyone revert this?
Colin
On 2013-09-15
Hi,
On 15.09.2013 23:09, Colin Smale wrote:
Just forwarding this to talk-gb as well as it is on their patch...
Appears Firefishy has already taken care of it
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/17858148
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09
On 15/09/2013 21:41, OpenStreetmap HADW wrote:
I'm pretty sure that store locators pages on chain store web sites are
not safe sources, but can someone confirm this.
What do mean by safe? Inaccurate? Unlawful?
There's nothing really wrong with the closed polygon that can't be fixed
by
On 15 September 2013 22:24, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 15/09/2013 21:41, OpenStreetmap HADW wrote:
I'm pretty sure that store locators pages on chain store web sites are
not safe sources, but can someone confirm this.
What do mean by safe? Inaccurate? Unlawful?
Likely to be
11 matches
Mail list logo
