Re: [Talk-GB] Advice needed for maxweight turning restriction

The oneway except cyclists bit is a well defined thing, whereby you can use the tag cycleway=opposite. You can be more specific by saying opposite_lane, or opposite_track as appropriate. (There are other way to tag the same thing which may be appropriate). Shaun On 12 Oct 2013, at 21:00, Phili

Re: [Talk-GB] Names on Power Lines

On 2013-10-13 13:21, SK53 wrote: This morning I came across a name tag on a power line . I believe this is now quite a common practice (> 8% of lines in an 3-month old data-set). Personally I deplore it: * I have never found a convenient

Re: [Talk-GB] Advice needed for maxweight turning restriction

On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 04:23:56PM +0100, Brian Prangle wrote: > why not just tag a node on the road where the sign is as maxweight? It's > much simpler and reflects what's on the ground > Because the signs can only be seen from one direction. A single node maxweight would suggest that overweight

Re: [Talk-GB] Names on Power Lines

Also a reference number, e.g "PKF 14". This seems to be the ref of the line (e.g "PKF") plus the sequential number of the pylon. Nick -Brad Rogers wrote: - To: TalkGB ML From: Brad Rogers Date: 13/10/2013 07:25PM Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Names on Power Lines On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 19:00:5

Re: [Talk-GB] Names on Power Lines

On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 19:00:58 +0100 Rob Nickerson wrote: Hello Rob, >seeing signs on pylons but cannot recall exactly what was on it. Usually warnings of dire consequences (i.e. death) for anyone playing on them. -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _)rad

Re: [Talk-GB] Names on Power Lines

Hi, Looking at National Grids shapefiles (published online [1] but no licence stated so assumed to be copyright), then it appears that names like the one you linked to are used but on the circuit rather than the line. For example, each line-string (or "way" in OSM terminology) can have a circuit 1

Re: [Talk-GB] Unclassified and Tertiary Roads

Many thanks for all the responses. I've changed Roach Road (it is free of pot holes at the moment!) to unclassified but will survey the others before changing them. Regards Dudley ___ Talk-GB mailing list

Re: [Talk-GB] Advice needed for maxweight turning restriction

why not just tag a node on the road where the sign is as maxweight? It's much simpler and reflects what's on the ground Regards Brian On 13 October 2013 12:28, ael wrote: > On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 09:00:38PM +0100, Philip Barnes wrote: > > I came across an odd situation where a road is on way

Re: [Talk-GB] Names on Power Lines

On Sun, 2013-10-13 at 13:21 +0100, SK53 wrote: > This morning I came across a name tag on a power line. I believe this > is now quite a common practice (> 8% of lines in an 3-month old > data-set). Personally I deplore it: > * I have never found a convenient sign on a power line giving >

[Talk-GB] Names on Power Lines

This morning I came across a name tag on a power line. I believe this is now quite a common practice (> 8% of lines in an 3-month old data-set). Personally I deplore it: - I have never found a convenient sign on a power line giving it's na

Re: [Talk-GB] Advice needed for maxweight turning restriction

On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 09:00:38PM +0100, Philip Barnes wrote: > I came across an odd situation where a road is on way, except for cycles > and vehicles over 13'3" high. Its a residential area of Shrewsbury which > would be a useful rat run, hence the oneway. But to make it complicated, > there is

Re: [Talk-GB] Advice needed for maxweight turning restriction

On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 08:11:41PM +0100, Ed Loach wrote: > ael wrote: > > > I have a road with a maxweight (7.5t) sign at one end but none at > the > > other end. So I take it that this means that vehicles over this > weight > > may not enter from that end. > > > > I have used a relation tagged