Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] trying to get a Wheelchair kurb project off the ground

2015-03-24 Thread Andy Mabbett
On 24 March 2015 at 08:44, Mark Croft mark.croft@gmail.com wrote:

[ I accidentally replied to Mark, not to the mailing list (apologies,
Mark), so am reposting my reply, and part of his response, below]

 The main goal at the moment is try to get a record of all the drop
 kerbs in a small area around kidderminster maybe other parts of
 worcestershire depending on the volunteers we got at the moment.

How are you tagging them? Can you link to some examples, please, and
is there a page on the wiki about the tag?

 Would anyone else like to get involved with this project?

I'll help where I can.

This could be one of our quarterly projects.

#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#

Mark then replied to the effect that he needs advice on the best way
to tag dropped kerbs, and with a link to:

  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/sloped_curb

but I also note:

   http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/kerb

Mark also suggests asking Worcestershire County Council for their
data; and I agree that this would be a good move.

-- 
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

___
Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list
Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands


Re: [Talk-GB] New OS open data now available

2015-03-24 Thread Rob Nickerson
Some more detail in the following article. Includes the assessment that it
offers spatial data that is generally much higher in accuracy than most
building shapes already on OpenStreetMap

http://oobrien.com/2015/03/os-open/

Rob

On 24 March 2015 at 17:58, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi all,

 So the new OS OpenData that was discussed a few weeks ago is now available:


 https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/blog/2015/03/new-os-opendata-products-now-live/

 I think there could be many good uses of this including to help validate
 some of our data.

 If anyone is using this then let us know so that we don't duplicate work.

 Rob

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


[Talk-GB] New OS open data now available

2015-03-24 Thread Rob Nickerson
Hi all,

So the new OS OpenData that was discussed a few weeks ago is now available:

https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/blog/2015/03/new-os-opendata-products-now-live/

I think there could be many good uses of this including to help validate
some of our data.

If anyone is using this then let us know so that we don't duplicate work.

Rob
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] New OS open data now available

2015-03-24 Thread tony wroblewski
Hi All

Just had a quick look at the OpenData, in summary:

- Buildings are slightly more detailed, basically vector versions of
the one on the streetview raster map
- All of the rest, forests, rivers, are no different than the current
Vector data we already have (AFAIK). Forests,rivers etc are the same
size as the older data.
- Roads seem to include a few more details, but not enough detail on
them for accurate usage in OSM.

So basically, it gives us slightly improved buildings, but they are
still highly simplified in terms of their pay for products.

Tony


On 24 March 2015 at 18:58, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi all,

 So the new OS OpenData that was discussed a few weeks ago is now available:

 https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/blog/2015/03/new-os-opendata-products-now-live/

 I think there could be many good uses of this including to help validate
 some of our data.

 If anyone is using this then let us know so that we don't duplicate work.

 Rob


 ___
 Talk-GB mailing list
 Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


[Talk-gb-london] Mapping Planning Meeting - Tomorrow 7pm - Penderel's Oak

2015-03-24 Thread Harry Wood
On Wednesday 25th March (That's tomorrow!) we will be holding a Mapping 
Planning Meeting at The Penderel's Oak pub from 7pm


As we enter spring and approach the start of British Summer Time we need to 
look at the state of London's OpenStreetMap coverage and plan some mapping. 
What are the data types of focus on? Most interesting data to map? Most 
in-demand data? Most glaring omissions? Where will we hold mapping events? 
Which pubs will we go to? All of these are to be discussed in this mapping 
planning meeting.



The Penderel's Oak pub is here: http://osm.org/go/euu4mauUg-?m=   It's between 
Holborn and Chancery Lane tube. We'll be there from 7pm

This is a big pub. We'll aim to get a table somewhere near the main entrance. 
We'll also aim to get organised with an OpenStreetMap sign and / or an orange 
OSM Surveyors Jacket /  Polo shirts.
Sign up on lanyrd: 
http://lanyrd.com/2015/mapping-planning-meeting/
By signing up there, you make the event look more popular (Note: A lot of 
people don't bother signing up. We expect between 5 and 15 people)

As always...

London events listed here: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/London#Upcoming_Events

And you should follow https://twitter.com/OSMLondon

Harry

___
Talk-gb-london mailing list
Talk-gb-london@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-london


Re: [Talk-GB] New OS open data now available

2015-03-24 Thread Rob Nickerson
My understanding was that the river dataset is now fully connected (and
wasn't before). Is this not the case?

Are there any attributes on the building vector data?

Rob
On 24 Mar 2015 18:28, tony wroblewski tony.wroblew...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi All

 Just had a quick look at the OpenData, in summary:

 - Buildings are slightly more detailed, basically vector versions of
 the one on the streetview raster map
 - All of the rest, forests, rivers, are no different than the current
 Vector data we already have (AFAIK). Forests,rivers etc are the same
 size as the older data.
 - Roads seem to include a few more details, but not enough detail on
 them for accurate usage in OSM.

 So basically, it gives us slightly improved buildings, but they are
 still highly simplified in terms of their pay for products.

 Tony


 On 24 March 2015 at 18:58, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hi all,
 
  So the new OS OpenData that was discussed a few weeks ago is now
 available:
 
 
 https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/blog/2015/03/new-os-opendata-products-now-live/
 
  I think there could be many good uses of this including to help validate
  some of our data.
 
  If anyone is using this then let us know so that we don't duplicate work.
 
  Rob
 
 
  ___
  Talk-GB mailing list
  Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
  https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
 

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] New OS open data now available

2015-03-24 Thread tony wroblewski
I've just checked the buildings shape file, and every single entry has
the same feature code unfortunately, the same with woodland.

There is however a functional site shape file which gives outlines of
where some key buildings are, along with their names, e.g. Schools,
Hospitals. So this will be useful.

In the download I did (OpenMap), the waterways weren't connected, but
there is a separate download of water features which might be better
quality. I'll give it a try shortly and see if it's any better.

Tony



On 24 March 2015 at 19:34, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
 My understanding was that the river dataset is now fully connected (and
 wasn't before). Is this not the case?

 Are there any attributes on the building vector data?

 Rob

 On 24 Mar 2015 18:28, tony wroblewski tony.wroblew...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi All

 Just had a quick look at the OpenData, in summary:

 - Buildings are slightly more detailed, basically vector versions of
 the one on the streetview raster map
 - All of the rest, forests, rivers, are no different than the current
 Vector data we already have (AFAIK). Forests,rivers etc are the same
 size as the older data.
 - Roads seem to include a few more details, but not enough detail on
 them for accurate usage in OSM.

 So basically, it gives us slightly improved buildings, but they are
 still highly simplified in terms of their pay for products.

 Tony


 On 24 March 2015 at 18:58, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hi all,
 
  So the new OS OpenData that was discussed a few weeks ago is now
  available:
 
 
  https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/blog/2015/03/new-os-opendata-products-now-live/
 
  I think there could be many good uses of this including to help validate
  some of our data.
 
  If anyone is using this then let us know so that we don't duplicate
  work.
 
  Rob
 
 
  ___
  Talk-GB mailing list
  Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
  https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
 

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] New OS open data now available

2015-03-24 Thread tony wroblewski
Hi All

The river network download is country wide, and does include
connecting node information, along with the names. The data is much
better quality and more accurate than some of the older imported stuff
in OSM. It only includes major rivers and streams and is simplified,
it does not include drains, etc..

The road download is also country wide, it includes connecting node
information and also the names of the roads. It also seems to include
residential roads.

Tony


On 24 March 2015 at 19:34, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
 My understanding was that the river dataset is now fully connected (and
 wasn't before). Is this not the case?

 Are there any attributes on the building vector data?

 Rob

 On 24 Mar 2015 18:28, tony wroblewski tony.wroblew...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi All

 Just had a quick look at the OpenData, in summary:

 - Buildings are slightly more detailed, basically vector versions of
 the one on the streetview raster map
 - All of the rest, forests, rivers, are no different than the current
 Vector data we already have (AFAIK). Forests,rivers etc are the same
 size as the older data.
 - Roads seem to include a few more details, but not enough detail on
 them for accurate usage in OSM.

 So basically, it gives us slightly improved buildings, but they are
 still highly simplified in terms of their pay for products.

 Tony


 On 24 March 2015 at 18:58, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hi all,
 
  So the new OS OpenData that was discussed a few weeks ago is now
  available:
 
 
  https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/blog/2015/03/new-os-opendata-products-now-live/
 
  I think there could be many good uses of this including to help validate
  some of our data.
 
  If anyone is using this then let us know so that we don't duplicate
  work.
 
  Rob
 
 
  ___
  Talk-GB mailing list
  Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
  https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
 

___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] New OS open data now available

2015-03-24 Thread Will Phillips
I have had an initial look at the three new open data products that 
contain road names: OS Open Map, OS Open Names and OS Open Roads. I was 
hoping they might provide new information for improving the accuracy and 
completeness of road naming, but my preliminary conclusion is that they 
offer very little for this purpose. They all contain the same 
misspellings as OS Locator. It has been noted that some OS paid-for 
products (MasterMap in particular) don't contain most of the 
misspellings, so I thought there was a small chance that one of these 
products might not as well. I was also hoping that OS Open Names might 
have included named residential paths (those where the names function as 
a 'street' in an address), but that isn't the case. I suspect OS Open 
Names includes exactly the same street names as OS Locator.


Secondly, I looked at whether OS Open Map or OS Open Roads could be used 
to check whether segments of streets in OSM have the correct name - for 
example whether names start and end in the correct position - but I have 
found the naming of the streets in these data sets has been simplified 
in a way that makes them unreliable for this purpose. For example, I 
immediately noticed the name of the street on which I live is missing. 
The street is present but is combined with an adjoining street and only 
given the name of the other street. This simplification seems to have 
been done everywhere. Therefore, please don't assume part of a street is 
wrongly named based solely on this data, because it is unsuitable for 
that purpose.


Will

On 24/03/2015 17:58, Rob Nickerson wrote:


Hi all,

So the new OS OpenData that was discussed a few weeks ago is now 
available:


https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/blog/2015/03/new-os-opendata-products-now-live/

I think there could be many good uses of this including to help 
validate some of our data.


If anyone is using this then let us know so that we don't duplicate work.

Rob



___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb


Re: [Talk-GB] New OS open data now available

2015-03-24 Thread Pmailkeey .
I'd suggest you use OSM as it'll likely be more accurate.


-- 
Mike.
@millomweb https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction -
For all your info on Millom and South Copeland
via *the area's premier website - *

*currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property
 pets*

TCs https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb