On Thu, Jul 2, 2020, at 5:38 PM, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
> I'm not completely sure if/how we can best make use of the new OS
> OpenData (UPRNs, USRNs and related links) in OpenStreetMap, but as a
> first step I've set up a quick slippy map with the UPRN locations
> shown...
>
Thanks
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020, at 2:08 AM, Warin wrote:
> On 17/3/20 8:02 am, ael wrote:
>> In cases like this I would use the source tag on the way so that others have
>> a very good chance of seeing it and respecting the previous work rather than
>> simply changing it to what they think it should be.
I might have some traces for the straight through Devon to Cornwall route so
probably the same as what you already have. It would be better if someone more
local took a look.
It's a shame that the state of aerial photography for the SW that is available
to mappers is now so poor.
Kevin
On
Added a new Range store a couple of weeks ago as shop=houseware although
shop=homeware would be fine as well. I think department store has some Grace
Brothers style connotations regarding layout that The Range doesn't have at all.
Kevin
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019, at 1:00 PM, Silent Spike wrote:
>
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019, at 3:21 PM, Andrzej wrote:
>
> Thank you for your opinion, Robert. I will suspend adding postcodes from
> Code-point Open.
>
> Do others agree with it or would you rather have more postcodes in database
> first and work on accuracy and completeness afterwards?
>
>
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019, at 12:56 PM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> In that case maybe it would be a good idea to merge existing address-only
> nodes
> with building outlines as the first step?
Some buildings (usually post office locations but also some others such as
council offices) can have more
On Sat, Jul 13, 2019, at 12:47 PM, Borbus wrote:
> ...That data is included with the OS tidal waters data. It's not much more
> effort to use it and it's very useful data for many people. People use
> maps for many different things. Rendering is not a problem. Carto
> handles it just fine
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019, at 8:05 PM, Borbus wrote:.
> Does that matter, though? The way many things in OSM are tagged is quite
> arbitrary. What if "coastline" just means "mean high water level"? A tag
> for MHWL seems much more useful than "you would probably consider this
> the coast rather than
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019, at 10:41 PM, Borbus wrote:
>
> The Dart cuts the coastline off right at the mouth, which doesn't seem
> right...
>
I think the main reason I did that back in the day is that mapping coastline
all the way up to Totnes seems extremely non-intuitive. Someone standing on
Saw this on the local news last night. A 30+ mile diversion is going to cause a
few problems over Easter if they can't get it sorted. I am not that close but
have mapped this area a bit in the past.
No real view either way on adding the restriction to OSM. Good for users who
keep their data
This stuff is hilarious. Standing outside people's homes taking photos of their
cars and house isn't going to end very well.
Is it maybe possible to get building heights from lidar data?
Kevin
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019, at 11:17 PM, Warin wrote:
> On 20/03/19 07:51, Neil Matthews wrote:
> >
> >
Yes and yes. Just tag it as a footway then with the appropriate designation.
Kevin
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019, at 4:14 PM, Martin Wynne wrote:
> On 14/03/2019 15:29, Devonshire wrote:
> > If there are parallel tracks visible (even if maybe historic) I would tag
> > it as a track, if
If there are parallel tracks visible (even if maybe historic) I would tag it as
a track, if a single track is visible then tag it as a footway.
Kevin
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019, at 3:19 PM, Martin Wynne wrote:
> > The path tag is actively being discouraged.
>
> Which makes it more necessary to have
12, 2019, at 7:37 AM, Adam Snape wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2019, 12:54 Devonshire, wrote:
>> __
>> I have personally deprecated highway=bridleway|byway etc. as the combination
>> of highway=footway|track|service and designation=public_footpath etc.
>> cont
I have personally deprecated highway=bridleway|byway etc. as the combination of
highway=footway|track|service and designation=public_footpath etc. contains
more useful information both for map rendering and for active map users.
Whether you wan't to do the same is up to you.
Kevin
On Mon, Mar
15 matches
Mail list logo
