If there are parallel tracks visible (even if maybe historic) I would tag it as a track, if a single track is visible then tag it as a footway.
Kevin On Thu, Mar 14, 2019, at 3:19 PM, Martin Wynne wrote: > > The path tag is actively being discouraged. > > Which makes it more necessary to have some direction on what constitutes > a "track". Is sufficient width for vehicles enough by itself to convert > a footpath to a track, or does there need to be some evidence of actual > vehicular use? > > It's a common question in these parts. Here is another track? or path? > -- which is it? On the right is an old track which is legally a public > footpath. It's wide enough for vehicles, but all vehicular traffic has > long since transferred itself to crossing the field on the left instead: > > http://85a.uk/track_query_960x648.jpg > > (not the same track as my previous photos) > > cheers, > > Martin. > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
