David Earl wrote:
Chris Hill wrote:
Since this is a Freedom of Information Act request, and they have
refused to supply me the requested information I'll ask the Office of
the Information Commissioner for a ruling. Not expecting much, but
you never know.
Even if they did or do supply
On 16 Jul 2009, at 11:31, Chris Hill wrote:
David Earl wrote:
Chris Hill wrote:
Since this is a Freedom of Information Act request, and they have
refused to supply me the requested information I'll ask the Office
of the Information Commissioner for a ruling. Not expecting much,
but
I don't know whether this has been explored before, but a tit-bit from Bob Barr
who gave a SOTM key note last year and enjoyed himself so he came again.
Bob is councillor in ?Warrington and once asked all the councils in the greater
Manchester area for boundary data. All supplied him
On 15 Jul 2009, at 14:13, Abigail Brady wrote:
This is certainly worth pursuing. Unfortunately, the real problem
comes in rural areas where, for example, boundaries are defined to
be the paths of things like hedges that aren't there any more,
previous courses of rivers, etc. There are
If all else fails, have we considered the option of reverse-
engineering our own text-based definitions from the OS-derived data,
following a clean room approach (i.e. one person writes the text by
reference to the OS map, and passes it on to someone else who plots it
on OSM)?
Yes,
5 matches
Mail list logo
