@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-GB] NCN numbering
Apologies for thread breakage - the otherwise excellent Nabble has fallen
over.
All white-on-red numbered routes are National Routes and should be tagged
with ncn_ref (or the relation equivalent). This includes all the new three-
figure routes.
White
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 01:49 -0700, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
I think, ultimately, Sustrans' internal semantics shouldn't really
concern
us documenting the system from outside (even those of us who also
happen to
be rangers ;) ).
Are the cycle routes representative of what is on the ground,
...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Henry Gomersall
Sent: 01 July 2010 9:59 AM
To: Richard Fairhurst
Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] NCN numbering
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 01:49 -0700, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
I think, ultimately, Sustrans' internal semantics shouldn't really
Apologies for thread breakage - the otherwise excellent Nabble has fallen over.
All white-on-red numbered routes are National Routes and should be tagged with
ncn_ref (or the relation equivalent). This includes all the new three-figure
routes.
White-on-blue are Regional Routes. These are being
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Apologies for thread breakage - the otherwise excellent Nabble has fallen
over.
All white-on-red numbered routes are National Routes and should be tagged
with ncn_ref (or the relation equivalent). This includes
On 30 Jun 2010, at 19:47, Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com
wrote:
And just to confuse matters, Oxford has it's own local numbering (1-9
on blue backgrounds).
Yep. Several places have local networks (we tag them with lcn_ref) and it is
*really* confusing when they use blue
6 matches
Mail list logo
