If I put Drimnin in the centre of my tablet's screen in an area of 780m EW and
515m NS (landscape) the land/sea boundary is marked (not always accurately) by
a number of coincident way/relation/multipolygon items all of which pass
through 49 things that look like nodes.
There are actually 71
ter) seaward of the mean low water spring
tide within that area". So its boundary it linked to the admin boundary "by
definition" as they are both linked to the low water line, but NOT linked to
the "GB multipolygon" by definition as the latter is linked to high water.
--
his polygon in
OSM is based on the coastline, but I might be wrong...
--colin
On 2017-08-23 10:22, Stuart Reynolds wrote:
On 23 Aug 2017, at 09:00, Mike Parfitt
<m_parf...@hotmail.com<mailto:m_parf...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
If the GB multipolygon should follow the high tide li
added without having zoomed in properly, with the editor choosing to
re-use an existing node instead of creating a new one. So my reaction to your
statements b and c is "it depends".
//colin
On 2017-08-11 22:07, Mike Parfitt wrote:
If I put Drimnin in the centre of my tablet's screen in
Berry' ; 'Mike Parfitt'
Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: RE: [Talk-GB] Motorway junctions where the slow lane seperates from
the through lanes
See also
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes
which has some quite good notes on how to map lanes. I suspect this is how
OsmAnd knows to give
The technical term is a drop lane. This might later intersect with a
roundabout, join with another motorway or primary road etc. Between junctions,
a single way for each direction is commonplace. At junctions, there are ways
for the through lanes and for traffic exiting and entering the
There may be some merit in tagging permanent artwork on the sides of buildings.
But tagging pavement/street art that will vanish after a couple of showers
seems pointless.
From: Peter Neale via Talk-GB
Sent: 26 April 2020 18:38:06
To: mar...@templot.com
Cc:
7 matches
Mail list logo
