The property extents might be something that can be turned into landuse
polygons. The existing ones where I live are very low quslity.
--
Andrew
From: Tim Waters
Sent: 14 June 2018 14:09:57
To: OSM - Talk GB
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Has someone just given us (the
On 14 June 2018 14:09:57 BST, Tim Waters wrote:
>I think master map buildings could be really good for use for imagery
>offsets and to effectively ground truth surrounding traced features.
I am certainly using OS 24 inch maps in that way to work out where one building
ends and another begins.
Mike Thacker wrote:
> Yes, a threshold on getting the data via an API, but true Open
> Government Licence doesn't limit the amount of data used (as
> far as I know) so it should be possible to build up a fill picture
> as open data.
The transaction-limited versions don't appear to be being
On 13/06/2018 17:08, Simon Poole wrote:
Most of the time such much applauded changes in policy work mainly for
the big guys (aka the goog, here and tomtom), by lowering the costs to
have similar level of non-automotive related detail as the national
mapping agencies and OSM. I don't quite
Most of the time such much applauded changes in policy work mainly for
the big guys (aka the goog, here and tomtom), by lowering the costs to
have similar level of non-automotive related detail as the national
mapping agencies and OSM. I don't quite see and haven't seen in other
countries, even in
There's a transaction threshold, so not fully opendata: although I'm sure
it could be gamed by a crowd!
Before getting overly excited, take a look at the (poorly attributed)
sample 1km sq in Exeter. Volume of data is very large with (just)
buildings, road & pavement edges, property boundaries
6 matches
Mail list logo
