Re: [talk-au] Explicit Permission to use NSW Land and Property Information data

>Something is wrong with my mailing program... :-[ >I have just checked on the talk_au archive on the web ... >I am missing a few messages .. one of which makes Andrews' position >clear. Apologises to those concerned! It's not just your mail program, I'm finding that not all of the list

Re: [talk-au] Explicit Permission to use NSW Land and Property Information data

Attribution/New South Wales Government Data/FullLetter - OpenStreetMap Wiki |   | |   |   |   |   |   | | Attribution/New South Wales Government Data/FullLetter - OpenStreetMap WikiReturn-Path: Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by

Re: [talk-au] Explicit Permission to use NSW Land and Property Information data in JOSM

W LPI layers in JOSM was Re: Explicit Permission to use NSW Land and Property Info...[talk-au] NSW LPI layers in JOSM was Re: Explicit Permission to use NSW Land and Property Information data in JOSM Andrew Davidson u887 at yahoo.com Sun Dec 6 09:22:17 UTC 2015 | | | | View on lists.openstreetmap.o

[talk-au] NSW LPI layers in JOSM was Re: Explicit Permission to use NSW Land and Property Information data in JOSM

Having done a bit of reading I think it may be more polite to use the TMS version of the layers. It would appear that the WMS version requires processing on the server side where as the TMS version is just pointing to pre-rendered images.  The base map address is below in Cam's email. The

[talk-au] Attributing NSW LPI data was Re: Explicit Permission to use NSW Land and Property Information data

Can we have something simplier, like map.lpi.nsw.gov.au or imagery.lpi.nsw.gov.au? If people want to import the vector data then we'd have to tag that differently (and go through the import process). The date is a bit of a problem as it's going to be any date after now. If you tag your

Re: [talk-au] Explicit Permission to use NSW Land and Property Information data in JOSM

It's easier to go with the WMS versions by choosing add WMS and pointing at: http://maps.six.nsw.gov.au/arcgis/services/public/NSW_Imagery/MapServer/WMSServer?request=GetCapabilities=WMS for the aerial imagery.

Re: [talk-au] Explicit Permission to use NSW Land and Property Information data

Rather ironically I'm about half a dozen suburbs from completing Sydney.  When I started other people had done about 25% of the suburbs and I carried on with their approach of using the existing OSM map features that corresponded to the boundaries which are mostly streets, property boundaries

Re: [talk-au] Melbourne Airport (mapped as both node and way)

You might as well clean it up as somebody is eventually going to find it here: http://keepright.ipax.at/report_map.php?schema=50=56568170 and do it anyway. On Wednesday, 30 September 2015, 19:31, Andrew Harvey wrote: Currently Melbourne Airport appears in

Re: [talk-au] NSW NP tracks closed during total fire ban days

I'd prefer going with access rather than opening_hours for a couple of reasons: 1. Opening_hours is more geared towards POIs whereas access applies to ways (which is what the wiki entry for opening_hours hints at).2. Putting in opening_hours="Closed during Total Fire Ban days" causes the JOSM

Re: [talk-au] NSW NP tracks closed during total fire ban days

I'm an eejit; JOSM only complains if you don't escape the comment in the opening_hours value with quotation marks. So your tag will quite happily survive. On Friday, 25 September 2015, 16:16, Andrew Davidson <u...@yahoo.com> wrote: I'd prefer going with access rathe

Re: [talk-au] Average speed limit cameras

> At 220 km/h average speed you would need to pull over and wait some 5 minutes > 13.04 seconds to be 'safe' (from a fine). If you are driving a car you don't even need to bother to wait. Currently in NSW point-to-point cameras are only used to check heavy vehicle speeds. 

Re: [talk-au] Question - restricted turning restrictions

After much head scratching, reading the wiki and tagging mail-list the best I could come up with is: type = restriction restriction:conditional= no_left_turn @ length 19 See: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions However I can see two problems: 1. There are only 11 

Re: [talk-au] Unauthorised bike trails in national parks

If the path exists then shouldn't it be tagged access=no + foot=yes?  From:fors...@ozonline.com.au fors...@ozonline.com.au Date:Thu, 30 Jul, 2015 at 11:53 Subject:Re: [talk-au] Unauthorised bike trails in national parks Thanks for the replies The track exists and is mappable. It is not blocked

Re: [talk-au] High country huts

The correct tagging seems to be straight forward: tourism=alpine_hut indicates that there is a Permanent human presence during the opening period from staff to provide services (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dalpine_hut). tourism=wilderness_hut means that there are sleeping

<    1   2   3   4