Salut,
Pour info l'usage de contact:xxx pour ne pas dupliquer les adresses est
aussi connu sous le nom de "Bremen Schema"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Bremen_Schema
À++
--
Victor Grousset/tuxayo
_
ée.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Manque_d%27attribution_appropri%C3%A9e
À++ :)
--
tuxayo
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
^^
Ça permettrait aussi d'avoir des chiffres sur les problèmes.
Et d'avoir les réponses des établissement/prof/élèves quand on en a des
pertinentes.
Faut voir les détails sur format de la page, mais on pourrait grouper
par établissement présumé?
À
modèle un peu plus complet et simple.
Voilà le message (en anglais malheureusement):
http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Tagging-the-presence-or-absence-of-signs-for-surveillance-cameras-td5958891.html
À++,
--
Victor/tuxayo
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr
au panneau réglementaire dans les contextes où une telle
réglementation existe.
Si ça vous semble pas trop mal, je peux ouvrir le sujet sur la liste
tagging.
== alternative ==
Si signed=* est trop général et que c'est gênant:
camera:signed=yes
camera:signed=no
À++
--
Victor/tuxayo
_
fr/topic/403/plainte-collective-cnil-obliger-paris-%C3%A0-publier-une-carte-de-ses-cam%C3%A9ras
--
Victor/tuxayo
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
.
On tombe dans le problème que les consommateurs ne doivent pas se fier
uniquement aux clefs et aux valeurs mais à la documentation.
Sans la doc, il y a un nombre énorme de clefs+valeurs qui seraient mal
interprétés.
À++
--
Victor/tuxayo
___
Talk-fr mailing
redondantes?
À++
--
tuxayo
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Bonjour,
Quelqu'un a des infos?
https://github.com/osm-fr/bano/issues/142
À++
--
Victor/tuxayo
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
nfluence it too much.
But not too big so use data from last month if possible. To have fresh
data and not stale because of a contributor having skipped too much and
not enough other contributors.
One month is also kind of arbitrary.
Cheers,
--
tuxayo
[1]
http://blog.improve-osm.org/en/20
thogonal to the 3 above
categories.
> An example with net benefit for OSM is MapRoulette. Therefore I would
> suggest to ask Martijn first for his best practices and then start to
> make rules on that.
Ask about what exactly? About how to avoid the issues with armchair mapping?
Cheers,
--
Victor Grousset/tuxayo
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
,
think about it and write this.
Feel free to comment here or in the discussion section :)
Cheers,
--
Victor Grousset/tuxayo
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Hi,
Or maybe one can do this in uMap and I haven't found it?
The need is to share locations on a map (that's why I though of uMap[1])
using their addresses.
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UMap
Cheers,
--
tuxayo
___
talk mailing list
talk
ng it, but they still fucked it up, and the damage is still there 6
> years later.
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/357366507
Damn, nice catch! At least now there is a note so hopefully it wont stay
forgotten for many years again ^^"
Cheers,
--
tuxayo
_
On 18/07/2016 15:57, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> Il giorno 18 lug 2016, alle ore 00:01, tuxayo <vic...@tuxayo.net> ha scritto:
>>
>> If the edit was discussed and approved, then if after the fact, damage
>> that was considered acceptable is discovered. Or d
On 14/07/2016 11:14, Éric Gillet wrote:
> tuxayo:
>> A fourth approach to fix that would be to have a first automated edit
>> changeset and then a manual fix changeset for the other errors.
>> A variant would be to reverse the order: fix the other errors first w
ors first when
inspecting the selected/searched objects to be automatically edited. And
then doing the automated edit.
Cheers,
--
tuxayo
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
a message when
first using the search and replace would be efficient.
*Who have the time to open a ticket?*
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/newticket
Are there any other common places where first time mass edits could be
performed without passing by the wiki?
> tuxayo:
>> The reporting o
utomated"
> edit than on each one-by-one manual updates, so I don't think the net
> gain of "automated" edits is negative.
It's not negative only if there are a minimum of rules to avoid lone
wolves doing large scale mistakes. We also want to avoid discouragin
ussion but this debate is very close to what I was
planning to post here when we would have finished.
--
tuxayo
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
)
Si alguien quiere empezar a añadir notas, puede poner los enlaces
en el pad para que sea simple de encontrar todas la cosas
relacionadas con esta importación.
Saludos,
--
Victor/tuxayo
___
Talk-es
ueréis echar un vistazo, lo tenéis aquí:
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37037887
Aquí tienen una lista de lo que creo son problemas, necesitaría
confirmación que todos son efectivamente problemas:
https://public.etherpad-mozilla.org/p/osm-bormujos-cleanning
22 matches
Mail list logo
