Re: [Talk-in] Boundary tagging scheme for India

2016-03-22 Thread Naveen Francis
This will give you an idea http://www.kslublris.com/LRIS/Kerala/district.php Just select Trissur or Ernakulum -- naveenpf On 23 March 2016 at 09:20, Jaisen Nedumpala wrote: > > > 2016-03-23 9:05 GMT+05:30 Jaisen Nedumpala : > >> >> >> 2016-03-22 22:46

Re: [Talk-in] Boundary tagging scheme for India

2016-03-22 Thread Jaisen Nedumpala
2016-03-22 22:46 GMT+05:30 Arun Ganesh : > My feedback on the current state of the proposal: > > # Admin Boundaries > > This looks good overall. The important aspect about admin boundaries is > that they are fairly static and do not change unless through legislation. > Is

Re: [Talk-in] Boundary tagging scheme for India

2016-03-22 Thread Arun Ganesh
My feedback on the current state of the proposal: # Admin Boundaries This looks good overall. The important aspect about admin boundaries is that they are fairly static and do not change unless through legislation. Is this understanding correct? I would correct the admin_level values to closely

[Talk-in] Boundary tagging scheme for India

2016-03-22 Thread Arun Ganesh
Merging recent discussions from district[1] and constituency [2] boundaries. The current tagging scheme for boundaries in India[3] has limitations since it was not effectively researched to properly separate revenue and local body boundaries. This is the reason to draw up a more well researched