Re: [talk-au] Help with overlapping features

[Graeme Fitzpatrick]

On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 at 15:21, David Wales  wrote:

> Hi Graham,
>
> What editor are you using?
>

Only ID

Thanks

Graeme

>
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Help with overlapping features

[Graeme Fitzpatrick]

On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 at 14:36, David Wales  wrote:

> Hi Graham,
>
> Are you just wanting to unglue the ways from each other, so that you can
> move things around without moving other things around?
>

Yeah, that would help, thanks David.

Thanks

Graeme
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Help with overlapping features

[David Wales]

Hi Graham, 

Are you just wanting to unglue the ways from each other, so that you can move 
things around without moving other things around? 

On 29 March 2019 12:07:39 pm AEDT, Graeme Fitzpatrick  
wrote:
>Hi
>
>Just doing some mapping around here
>https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/-28.8636/153.5756
>after a weeks holiday down there :-)
>
>If you have a look, there's a bit of a mess.
>
>The outer of the riverbank is 50 m's from the water up on dry land,
>wetlands have been marked in as also going up onto dry land, including
>over
>a road, footpath & houses!, & the boundary of the residential area has
>been
>tied to the riverbank, which is also tied to the footpath :-(
>
>Any easy way of fixing this, because I really don't want to delete
>everything & re-draw them!
>
>Thanks
>
>Graeme
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

[Talk-us] Whole-US Garmin Map update - 2019-03-26

[Dave Hansen]

These are based off of Lambertus's work here:

http://garmin.openstreetmap.nl

If you have questions or comments about these maps, please feel
free to ask.  However, please do not send me private mail.  The
odds are, someone else will have the same questions, and by
asking on the talk-us@ list, others can benefit.

Downloads:

http://daveh.dev.openstreetmap.org/garmin/Lambertus/2019-03-26

Map to visualize what each file contains:


http://daveh.dev.openstreetmap.org/garmin/Lambertus/2019-03-26/kml/kml.html


FAQ



Why did you do this?

I wrote scripts to joined them myself to lessen the impact
of doing a large join on Lambertus's server.  I've also
cut them in large longitude swaths that should fit conveniently
on removable media.  

http://daveh.dev.openstreetmap.org/garmin/Lambertus/2019-03-26

Can or should I seed the torrents?

Yes!!  If you use the .torrent files, please seed.  That web
server is in the UK, and it helps to have some peers on this
side of the Atlantic.

Why is my map missing small rectangular areas?

There have been some missing tiles from Lambertus's map (the
red rectangles),  I don't see any at the moment, so you may
want to update if you had issues with the last set.

Why can I not copy the large files to my new SD card?

If you buy a new card (especially SDHC), some are FAT16 from
the factory.  I had to reformat it to let me create a >2GB
file.

Does your map cover Mexico/Canada?

Yes!!  I have, for the purposes of this map, annexed Ontario
in to the USA.  Some areas of North America that are close
to the US also just happen to get pulled in to these maps.
This might not happen forever, and if you would like your
non-US area to get included, let me know. 

-- Dave


___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[talk-ph] UP Resilience Institute YouthMappers received the 2019 Women's Participation Award

[Eugene Alvin Villar]

The YouthMappers chapter of the UP Resilience Institute has received the
2019 Women's Participation Award from the International YouthMappers
network for engaging through leadership and membership of a majority of
female student mappers into their YouthMappers chapter.

Link:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1651211105185394/permalink/2008886366084531/
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

Re: [OSM-ja] はじめまして、マッピングパーティの準備の件で投稿します。

[Satoshi IIDA]

いいだです。
お返事遅れてしまってすみません。

部屋でマッピングをする時間ですが、
以前の経験からゆくと、だいたい、外を歩く時間と同じくらい
（1時間外を歩いたら、1時間の編集が必要）というのが目安です。

初心者の方が多いなどの場合は、レクチャーする時間を含めて+30分くらい、
部屋で作業する時間をみておくと安心できるかな、と思います。

ご参考になれば幸いです。



2019年3月25日(月) 7:46 kazsanInaba :

> はじめまして
> ナバウア（稲葉）と申します。
>
> 何人の方は知っていると思いますが、初めての投稿なので
> こう書かせていただきます。
>
> マッピングをするにおいて、Wifiがある部屋（会議室）が必要と聞きました。
> レンタルしたいと考えているので、
> だいたいすくなくとも何時間くらいそういった時間が必要でしょうか。
>
> よろしくお願いいたします。
>
> ___
> Talk-ja mailing list
> Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja
>


-- 
Satoshi IIDA
mail: nyamp...@gmail.com
twitter: @nyampire
___
Talk-ja mailing list
Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja

[talk-au] Help with overlapping features

[Graeme Fitzpatrick]

Hi

Just doing some mapping around here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/-28.8636/153.5756
after a weeks holiday down there :-)

If you have a look, there's a bit of a mess.

The outer of the riverbank is 50 m's from the water up on dry land,
wetlands have been marked in as also going up onto dry land, including over
a road, footpath & houses!, & the boundary of the residential area has been
tied to the riverbank, which is also tied to the footpath :-(

Any easy way of fixing this, because I really don't want to delete
everything & re-draw them!

Thanks

Graeme
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [Talk-it] come lo mappo?

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 28. Mar 2019, at 08:41, Andrea Musuruane  wrote:
> 
> Non credo che sia un luogo che attiri turisti quindi tourism=artwork + 
> artwork_type=statue (che comunque sarebbero in aggiunta) non vanno bene.


per me non c’è dubbio che si tratta di un’opera d’arte, senza valutare la 
qualità possiamo comunque vedere che si tratta di una scultura abbastanza 
grande in pietra, quindi tanto lavoro e costi significativi. Per fare un 
progetto del genere si vuole una certa determinazione, se ci piaccia o meno. 
Non vedo perché non inserirlo come public artwork (tourism=artwork). Non ci 
sono altri chiavi per mappare public art, e non devono essere attrazioni 
turistiche per meritarsi questo tag (sarebbe tourism=attraction).

Ciao, Martin 
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Vos conseils sur certains tags ?

[Christian Rogel]

> Le 27 mars 2019 à 16:59, marc marc  a écrit :
> 
> 
>> - je bloque également sur un cabinet de maîtrise d'oeuvre (construction, 
>> rénovation, extension...), si vous avez des conseils aussi ?
> 
> c'est quoi ? un cabinet d'architecte sans architecte qui conseille
> de manière "générale" au lieu d'entrer dans les détails concret ?
> c'est sans doute dans la catégorie office=*

Suur le wiki, la catégorie « Construction » est presque vide, car, on y trouve 
que « craf=tbuilder » qui a une courte définition : "A workplace or office of a 
tradesman who performs structural alterations and additions to buildings. »
Cela n’est guère transposable, sauf à y mettre tous les promoteurs, 
constructeurs de bâtiments en tous genre, desplus grands aux plus petits.
« Performs » est vague, car, il peut inclure aussi bien l « promotion » que la 
simple coordination des corps de métiers.

Ce n’est pas cela que visait @LaTelescop, mais un nouveau genre d’officine ( 
donc, « office=* ») qui se mutiplie depuis qu’il n’est pas obligatoire de faire 
appel à un architecte pour les superficies inférieures à 150m2.
Il y a les courtiers en travaux qui mettent en relation les donneurs d’ordre et 
les entrepreneurs qui sont alors payés séparément et les « contractants 
généraux »  qui, comme les architectes, réglent les prestations au fil de l’eau 
et centralisent les garanties.

Deux approches : assimiler le « contractant général" au promoteur et dans ce 
cas, l’anglais dit « office = general contractor », soit utiliser « 
office=builder » pour courtiers et contractants, avec peut-être un tag qui 
différencie le rôle.


Christian R.
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [Talk-de] Verkehrsberuhigter Bereich - maxspeed

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 28. Mar 2019, at 22:42, Florian Lohoff  wrote:
> 
> Das ist schon im highway=living_street. Das ist nach der bisherigen
> tagging praxis ein verkehrsberuhigt und damit Zeichen 325 und damit
> Schrittgeschwindigkeit.
> 
> Mehr ist einfach falsch weil du alles was du zusätzlich taggst falsch
> ist.



vermutlich dürfen dort keine weiteren Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzungen (explizit) 
aufgestellt werden, oder? Weil das Argument für das explizite taggen eines 
impliziten Limits ist normalerweise, dass man so angibt, dass kein explizites 
Limit besteht (im Gegensatz zu: man weiß es nicht, im Fall von keinen weiteren 
tags).

Gruß, Martin 
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [Talk-de] Verkehrsberuhigter Bereich - maxspeed

[Florian Lohoff]

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:30:11PM +0100, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Wenn man sagen will dass kein Schild explizit die Höchstgeschwindigkeit 
> vorgibt kann man z.B.
> source:maxspeed=DE:livingstreet verwenden.

Das ist schon im highway=living_street. Das ist nach der bisherigen
tagging praxis ein verkehrsberuhigt und damit Zeichen 325 und damit
Schrittgeschwindigkeit.

Mehr ist einfach falsch weil du alles was du zusätzlich taggst falsch
ist.

Flo
-- 
Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de
UTF-8 Test: The  ran after a , but the  ran away


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [Talk-de] Verkehrsberuhigter Bereich - maxspeed

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 27. Mar 2019, at 11:06, Florian Lohoff  wrote:
> 
> Wir haben eh ein massives problem mit "gefühlten access restrictions"
> da müssen wir das mit den maxspeeds nicht auch noch anfangen


wobei es eben auch Toleranzen gibt. Wenn jemand taggt, die Straße sei 8m breit, 
sie ist aber 9,20 breit, oder 7,50, dann ist das im Großen und Ganzen immer 
noch richtig. Oder ein Gebäude sei 18m hoch. Oder ein Berg 1749m. Oder ein 
Fluss 10m breit. Nur bei Geschwindigkeiten im Bereich unter 10km/h (nach 
deutscher Lesart, woanders sind 20km/h ggf. auch noch von 
Schrittgeschwindigkeit gedeckt) kommt es auf 1-2km/h an?

Wenn man sagen will dass kein Schild explizit die Höchstgeschwindigkeit vorgibt 
kann man z.B.
source:maxspeed=DE:livingstreet verwenden.

Gruß, Martin 
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [Talk-us] Announcing our Interim Executive Director & Upcoming Election

[Martijn van Exel]

This is great to hear and I am excited for the future!
Maggie told me she was going to do her best to make the Mappy Hour tonight, so 
that would be a great opportunity to meet (virtually).
Martijn

> On Mar 27, 2019, at 7:39 AM, Jonah Adkins  wrote:
> 
> In 2018 the board was unable to spend much time working with and supporting 
> the US mapping community because the majority of the board’s volunteer time 
> was spent on a hiring process that unfortunately did not work out as planned. 
> It became clear that the absence of an Executive Director was a step 
> backwards for the organization, and that it would be best for someone to step 
> into the role as soon as possible. We’re excited to announce that we have 
> hired Maggie Cawley to serve as interim Executive Director. Please give her a 
> warm welcome! [@MaggieMaps].
> 
> Maggie brings fifteen years of professional geospatial experience, 
> specializing in open source geospatial tools and education. Her passion for 
> maps has taken her all over the world - leading field data collection 
> efforts, training others in open source geospatial tools, or just spreading 
> the word about OpenStreetMap. She has been a board member for the last two 
> years and has also been a long time volunteer for TeachOSM, where she has 
> worked to promote the integration of geography into classrooms through 
> OpenStreetMap and supported teachers wanting to learn about OSM.
> 
> Now, Maggie will be based in Baltimore working full time to support and grow 
> OpenStreetMap US. For the remainder of the year, Maggie will be working with 
> the community and the board to develop a strategic plan for the organization, 
> including new programs and ideas for OpenStreetMap US. She will be connecting 
> with the community as much as possible, developing ways to expand programming 
> and membership, leading fundraising efforts, and supporting the board with 
> day-to-day administrative responsibilities. We believe her passion for maps, 
> professional experience, and dedication to the OpenStreetMap community will 
> benefit OpenStreetMap US over the coming months and we hope you will reach 
> out and help us welcome her into this new role.
> 
> Election to Fill Vacant Seat
> 
> As a result of taking on the interim ED role, Maggie is stepping down from 
> her seat on the board and we will need to fill her shoes through an election. 
> We urge you to nominate yourself or someone else to join the Board for the 
> remainder of the year. As a board member, you will help plan for State of the 
> Map US, be a part of the strategic planning process for the organization, and 
> support the US mapping community.
> 
> Questions? Join the #elections channel on OSM US Slack, tweet us, or email us 
> anytime.
> 
> Nomination Instructions
> 
> Nominations will be open from today, March 25 until Sunday March 31. To 
> nominate yourself, please go to the election wiki page, and add yourself to 
> the list. You can also see more information about the schedule and updated 
> timeline there.
> 
> Election Details
> 
> Monday April 1 and end Sunday April 7. This year based on popular request 
> we’re excited to announce that we’ll be using Ranked Choice Voting. To be 
> permitted to vote please make sure your OpenStreetMap US membership is in 
> good standing by March 31. We should be able to announce the new board member 
> on April 8.
> 
> 
> ___
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us


___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Soucis avec l'imagerie de JOSM ?

[pepilepi...@ovh.fr]

Le 28/03/2019 à 19:02, Jérôme Amagat a écrit :
> J'ai eu des soucis aussi avec la BDOrtho IGN mais maintenant tout a
> l'air de bien fonctionner!

En effet, maintenant ça baigne !

Bonne soirée,

JP

>
> ___
> Talk-fr mailing list
> Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr


-- 


Si ma réponse n'a pas résolu ton problème, c'est que tu n'as pas posé la
bonne question


___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

[Talk-us] Reminder: Virtual Mappy Hour tonight!

[Martijn van Exel]

Hi all, don't forget that the Virtual Mappy Hour is tonight!

The details (phone, video) are in this email --> 
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2019-March/019380.html 

The time is 6pm Pacific / 9pm Eastern.

Some topics we will talk about:
* OSM US news: Executive Director, Elections
* Emerging details about State of the Map US
* Discussion: who is attending local mapping groups, or organizing one even? 
What are your experiences?
* Mapping and Tagging: bring your favorite topic to discuss!
* What do YOU want out of the Mappy Hour? Presentations? Guests? Other Topics? 
Discussion.

Please join us!

Martijn___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-it] Mappa ciclabile - visualizzazione parcheggi bici

[Giulio Barba]

Grazie Volker e grazie Andrea.
Noni avevo mai notati bene. Forse perché non zoomavo abbastanza o forse
perché quelli mappati erano effettivamente pochi.
Grazie e perdonate la domanda.
Ero convinto di aver consultato anche la legenda in passato. Poi
effettivamente non usando molto il sito non ci ho più fatto caso.

Buona serata a tutti
Giulio

Il gio 28 mar 2019, 18:53 Andrea Albani  ha scritto:

>
>
> Il giorno gio 28 mar 2019 alle ore 16:44 Giulio Barba <
> giulioba...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
>> Ciao a tutti, ho una domanda relativa alla visualizzazione della mappa
>> ciclabile su www.openstreetmap.org. Selezionando la modalità ciclabile
>> vengono mostrati in maniera evidente i punti utili per i ciclisti ( piste
>> ciclabili, fontanelle, attraversamenti, negozi di bici, stazione bike
>> sharing, etc.); usando molto questa mappa per visualizzazioni "al volo"
>> anche per spostarmi in bici, credo sarebbe molto utile fosse visualizzata
>> anche la categoria "parcheggi biciclette".
>> Solitamente utilizzo questo sito:
>> https://www.flosm.de/en/poimap.html?lat=45.4375036=11.0001705=3482.5615=0=bicycleparking
>>
>>
>>
> In realtà questi elementi nella Opencyclemap ci sono.
> Un esempio in [1] relativo alla zona che hai linkato... si tratta del
> quadratino blu. In [2] la legenda
>
> Ciao
>
> [1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=20/45.44726/10.99385=C
> [2] http://www.opencyclemap.org/docs/
>
> Il giorno gio 28 mar 2019 alle ore 16:44 Giulio Barba <
> giulioba...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
>> Ciao a tutti, ho una domanda relativa alla visualizzazione della mappa
>> ciclabile su www.openstreetmap.org. Selezionando la modalità ciclabile
>> vengono mostrati in maniera evidente i punti utili per i ciclisti ( piste
>> ciclabili, fontanelle, attraversamenti, negozi di bici, stazione bike
>> sharing, etc.); usando molto questa mappa per visualizzazioni "al volo"
>> anche per spostarmi in bici, credo sarebbe molto utile fosse visualizzata
>> anche la categoria "parcheggi biciclette".
>> Solitamente utilizzo questo sito:
>> https://www.flosm.de/en/poimap.html?lat=45.4375036=11.0001705=3482.5615=0=bicycleparking
>>
>>
>> Mi chiedevo se altri ciclisti condividono questa miglioria, ed
>> eventualmente se qualcuno sa come contattare chi si occupa di gestire le
>> visualizzazioni sul sito www.openstreetmap.org
>>
>> Attendo i vostri pareri.
>> Grazie
>>
>> Giulio Barba
>>
>> ___
>> Talk-it mailing list
>> Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
>>
> ___
> Talk-it mailing list
> Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
>
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] come lo mappo?

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 27. Mar 2019, at 22:21, demon_box  wrote:
> 
> ci sono 2 statue va bene comunque 
> 
> tourism=art_work
> artwork_type=statue  ?
> 
> o cos'altro? non sò bene cosa fare...


se conosci il nome dell’artista...
ci metterei comunque anche memorial


Ciao, Martin 
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Soucis avec l'imagerie de JOSM ?

[Jérôme Amagat]

J'ai eu des soucis aussi avec la BDOrtho IGN mais maintenant tout a l'air
de bien fonctionner!
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [Talk-it] Mappa ciclabile - visualizzazione parcheggi bici

[Andrea Albani]

Il giorno gio 28 mar 2019 alle ore 16:44 Giulio Barba 
ha scritto:

> Ciao a tutti, ho una domanda relativa alla visualizzazione della mappa
> ciclabile su www.openstreetmap.org. Selezionando la modalità ciclabile
> vengono mostrati in maniera evidente i punti utili per i ciclisti ( piste
> ciclabili, fontanelle, attraversamenti, negozi di bici, stazione bike
> sharing, etc.); usando molto questa mappa per visualizzazioni "al volo"
> anche per spostarmi in bici, credo sarebbe molto utile fosse visualizzata
> anche la categoria "parcheggi biciclette".
> Solitamente utilizzo questo sito:
> https://www.flosm.de/en/poimap.html?lat=45.4375036=11.0001705=3482.5615=0=bicycleparking
>
>
>
In realtà questi elementi nella Opencyclemap ci sono.
Un esempio in [1] relativo alla zona che hai linkato... si tratta del
quadratino blu. In [2] la legenda

Ciao

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=20/45.44726/10.99385=C
[2] http://www.opencyclemap.org/docs/

Il giorno gio 28 mar 2019 alle ore 16:44 Giulio Barba 
ha scritto:

> Ciao a tutti, ho una domanda relativa alla visualizzazione della mappa
> ciclabile su www.openstreetmap.org. Selezionando la modalità ciclabile
> vengono mostrati in maniera evidente i punti utili per i ciclisti ( piste
> ciclabili, fontanelle, attraversamenti, negozi di bici, stazione bike
> sharing, etc.); usando molto questa mappa per visualizzazioni "al volo"
> anche per spostarmi in bici, credo sarebbe molto utile fosse visualizzata
> anche la categoria "parcheggi biciclette".
> Solitamente utilizzo questo sito:
> https://www.flosm.de/en/poimap.html?lat=45.4375036=11.0001705=3482.5615=0=bicycleparking
>
>
> Mi chiedevo se altri ciclisti condividono questa miglioria, ed
> eventualmente se qualcuno sa come contattare chi si occupa di gestire le
> visualizzazioni sul sito www.openstreetmap.org
>
> Attendo i vostri pareri.
> Grazie
>
> Giulio Barba
>
> ___
> Talk-it mailing list
> Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
>
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] Mappa ciclabile - visualizzazione parcheggi bici

[Volker Schmidt]

Sulla  visualizzazione OpenCycleMap di OSM i parcheggi bici
(amenity=bicycle_parking) sono visibili.
Vedi https://www.opencyclemap.org/docs/ per dettagli.
Quelli con >= 20 posti sono visibili da zoom >=15
Quelli con <20 sono solo visibli con zoom >=16

Volker

On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 16:44, Giulio Barba  wrote:

> Ciao a tutti, ho una domanda relativa alla visualizzazione della mappa
> ciclabile su www.openstreetmap.org. Selezionando la modalità ciclabile
> vengono mostrati in maniera evidente i punti utili per i ciclisti ( piste
> ciclabili, fontanelle, attraversamenti, negozi di bici, stazione bike
> sharing, etc.); usando molto questa mappa per visualizzazioni "al volo"
> anche per spostarmi in bici, credo sarebbe molto utile fosse visualizzata
> anche la categoria "parcheggi biciclette".
> Solitamente utilizzo questo sito:
> https://www.flosm.de/en/poimap.html?lat=45.4375036=11.0001705=3482.5615=0=bicycleparking
>
>
> Mi chiedevo se altri ciclisti condividono questa miglioria, ed
> eventualmente se qualcuno sa come contattare chi si occupa di gestire le
> visualizzazioni sul sito www.openstreetmap.org
>
> Attendo i vostri pareri.
> Grazie
>
> Giulio Barba
>
> ___
> Talk-it mailing list
> Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
>
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Soucis avec l'imagerie de JOSM ?

[marc marc]

Christian s'était farcit la collecte des données opendata pour 
reconstruire une couche qui contient +- les mêmes images
mais servie en locale par osm-fr, elle devrait être dispo dans josm

Le 28.03.19 à 17:23, Laurent Magréault a écrit :
> Bonjour,
> 
> Peut-être un lien avec l'incident en cours sur le Géoportail ?
> https://geoservices.ign.fr/blog/2019/03/28/incident-generalise-geoportail.html
>  
> 
> 
> ___)```)___
> 
> Laurent Magréault
> 
> 
> Le jeu. 28 mars 2019 à 17:17, pepilepioux a écrit :
> 
> Bonjour,
> 
> D'habitude la couche BDOrtho IGN permet de zoomer très fort pour
> avoir une vue bien détaillée, mais aujourd'hui :
> 
>   * elle est très lente à se charger
>   * il manque des tuiles
>   * et apparemment on n'a rien en dessous de 100 m dans la petite
> échelle en haut à gauche.
> 
> À qui signaler ce problème ?
> 
> Merci, bonne soirée
> 
> Jean-Pierre
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Soucis avec l'imagerie de JOSM ?

[Laurent Magréault]

Bonjour,

Peut-être un lien avec l'incident en cours sur le Géoportail ?
https://geoservices.ign.fr/blog/2019/03/28/incident-generalise-geoportail.html


___)```)___

Laurent Magréault


Le jeu. 28 mars 2019 à 17:17, pepilepi...@ovh.fr  a
écrit :

> Bonjour,
>
> D'habitude la couche BDOrtho IGN permet de zoomer très fort pour avoir une
> vue bien détaillée, mais aujourd'hui :
>
>- elle est très lente à se charger
>- il manque des tuiles
>- et apparemment on n'a rien en dessous de 100 m dans la petite
>échelle en haut à gauche.
>
> À qui signaler ce problème ?
>
> Merci, bonne soirée
>
> Jean-Pierre
> --
> --
>
> Si ma réponse n'a pas résolu ton problème, c'est que tu n'as pas posé la
> bonne question
>
> ___
> Talk-fr mailing list
> Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
>
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

[OSM-talk-fr] Soucis avec l'imagerie de JOSM ?

[pepilepi...@ovh.fr]

Bonjour,

D'habitude la couche BDOrtho IGN permet de zoomer très fort pour avoir
une vue bien détaillée, mais aujourd'hui :

  * elle est très lente à se charger
  * il manque des tuiles
  * et apparemment on n'a rien en dessous de 100 m dans la petite
échelle en haut à gauche.

À qui signaler ce problème ?

Merci, bonne soirée

Jean-Pierre

-- 


Si ma réponse n'a pas résolu ton problème, c'est que tu n'as pas posé la
bonne question


___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

[Talk-cl] Evento sobre datos geoespaciales producidos por la sociedad civil en CEPAL

[Javier Carranza]

Hola comunidad mapera de Chile,

Copio al dueño de la lista por si acaso yo hubiera hecho incorrectamente el
registro.

Queremos este año una vez más mandarles invitación para incluir integrantes
de nuestra comunidad  a un foro sobre datos geoespaciales y ODS que estamos
organizando en CEPAL

.
El evento no tiene costo pero hay que registrarse por cuestiones de
seguridad a un recinto diplomático.

Creemos que es valioso que se sumen todos los que puedan , ya que además de
la exposición que dá este tipo de eventos, la comunidad de Chile y otros
países podría generar contacto con directores de gobierno de estadísiticas
oficiales de la región y con organizaciones internacionales como el BID o
la CAF, el Banco Andino de Fomento. También será una oportunidad única para
convencer a gente que toma decisiones en uso datos no tradicionales a tomar
en serio a nuestra plataforma y a nuestra gente en sus planes.

Desde ya también los invitamos a presentar un poster  (o incluso recomendar
iniciativas de OSM ) de cosas hechas por maperos de Chile. El formato para
quienes estén interesados es este: https://bit.ly/2UVZJiM

Animo a todos a hacer un esfuerzo y registrarse.Si se deciden les dejo el
vinculo del formulario https://eventos.cepal.org/event/5/registrations/8/
Queda muy poquito tiempo. Les garantizo que ganaremos mucho si  nos unimos
para mostrarle las cosas que hacemos a las redes como estas de gobierno y
organizaciones internacionales.

Avisen cómo les va.

Saludos
[image: geocensos]
*Javier Carranza** Tresoldi** CEO*




*, GeoCensosLic. en EconomíaMSc. in Geoinformation Twente UniversityM.A. in
Economics Georgetown University@geocensos*Skype: javiercarranza

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7TKVurhKoU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cfdYdQHZVY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJQzhM52Zp0 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrGIA5Zzpc0 
Colombia  (57) 1 4595159
Mexico:(52) 1 55 35436613
Panama Mobile: (507) 688 - 04892
www.geocensos.com
*Let's map out together a better world*
 [image: Twitter]
 [image: LinkedIn]


"La información aquí contenida es para uso exclusivo de la persona o
entidad de destino. Está estrictamente prohibida su utilización, copia,
descarga, distribución, modificación y/o reproducción total o parcial, sin
el permiso expreso del representante legal de Fundación Geocensos, pues su
contenido puede ser de carácter confidencial y/o contener material
privilegiado. Si usted recibió esta información por error, por favor
contacte en forma inmediata a quien la envió y borre este material de su
computador. La Fundación GeoCensos no es responsable por la información
contenida en esta comunicación, el directo responsable es quien la firma o
el autor de la misma."
___
Talk-cl mailing list
Talk-cl@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cl

Re: [Talk-es] Presentación y primera duda

[boina]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512


El 28/3/19 a las 13:49, Alejandro Moreno escribió:
> Hola Jordi.
> 
> En la comunidad de Madrid puedes ver el ámbito de cada calle en la
> dirección
> http://www.madrid.org/nomecalles/Inicio.icm?=4464523=446443
5.5=426254=426369.75=1=092A0063
pas=%279%27,%271%27,%272%27,%27142%27=Catastro
> 
> Luego sería cuestión de cortar la vía por el punto donde cambio de nom
bre.

Ah, pues muchas gracias, aquí se ve bastante claro que la curva es de la
calle Carcavilla.

> 
> 
> 
> El jue., 28 mar. 2019 a las 13:39,  > escribió:
> 
> 
> El 27/3/19 a las 22:52, Jordi Miró Ferrer escribió:
>> Hola y bienvenido a la comunidad de OSM.
> 
> Hola, muchas gracias.
> 
> 
>> ¿Podrías indicarnos de qué calle se trata y en qué ciudad? En el edit
o
> r
>> por defecto que puedes encontrar en www.openstreetmap.org
> 
>>  (se llama iD) hay una opción para divi
d
> ir
>> una vía a partir de un nodo situado en dicha vía. En tu caso, puedes
>> consultar la capa de Catastro (en lugar de las ortofotos de PNOA) par
a
>> ver dónde termina el nombre de una calle y empieza la siguiente. Si n
o
>> está claro, puedes guiarte por la numeración de las casas (fíjate a
>> partir de qué casa empieza la numeración).
> 
> La calle existente es Carcavilla en Móstoles, la que no está es Pintor
> Zurbarán, el punto de encuentro es donde termina Pintor Zurbarán, en l
a
> capa de catastro si están las dos calles, pero no termino de ver claro
> donde está la separación, por ejemplo el número 11 de Pintor Zurbarán
> estaría en la prolongación de Caracavilla, tal vez se puede entender q
ue
> la curva pertenece a Pintor Zurbarán.
> 
> 
>> Saludos,
> 
> Saludos
> 
>> Jordi MF
> 
>> -
- -
> 
> ___
> Talk-es mailing list
> Talk-es@openstreetmap.org 
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es
> 
> 
> ___
> Talk-es mailing list
> Talk-es@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es
> 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=p4ZY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Talk-es mailing list
Talk-es@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es

[Talk-it] Mappa ciclabile - visualizzazione parcheggi bici

[Giulio Barba]

Ciao a tutti, ho una domanda relativa alla visualizzazione della mappa
ciclabile su www.openstreetmap.org. Selezionando la modalità ciclabile
vengono mostrati in maniera evidente i punti utili per i ciclisti ( piste
ciclabili, fontanelle, attraversamenti, negozi di bici, stazione bike
sharing, etc.); usando molto questa mappa per visualizzazioni "al volo"
anche per spostarmi in bici, credo sarebbe molto utile fosse visualizzata
anche la categoria "parcheggi biciclette".
Solitamente utilizzo questo sito:
https://www.flosm.de/en/poimap.html?lat=45.4375036=11.0001705=3482.5615=0=bicycleparking


Mi chiedevo se altri ciclisti condividono questa miglioria, ed
eventualmente se qualcuno sa come contattare chi si occupa di gestire le
visualizzazioni sul sito www.openstreetmap.org

Attendo i vostri pareri.
Grazie

Giulio Barba
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

[talk-latam] Invitación a mostrar nuestro trabajo en NNUU en Chile

[Comunidad GeoCensos]

Hola amigos,

Queremos  invitarlos para incluir a la mayor cantidad de integrantes de
nuestra comunidad  mapera a un foro que estamos organizando en NNUU en su
sede para América Latina y el Caribe de Chile

.

Todos quienes quieran difundir su trabajo en la plataforma están invitados
a presentar un poster con su mapa acá   Los que lo
verán son funcionarios de gobiernos y organismos internacionales de nuestra
región.

Les agradecermos si quieren  también recomendar iniciativas de OSM
interesantes en temas de desarrollo y nosotros los podemos hacer invitar.
Este año vamos a priorizar los aportes que podamos hacer como comunidad a
los Objetivos del Desarrollo Sustentable, que es un tema que viene
difundiendo varios compañeros, entre ellos Mikel Maron. Por eso va en copia.

Si desean registrarse y de frente ir (especialmente quienes vayan a estar
en Abril en Chile) les dejamos el vinculo
https://eventos.cepal.org/event/5/registrations/8/ para hacerlo. Cierra muy
pronto.

Besos y abrazos

Martín Coronado
Community Manager de GeoCensos
[image: geocensos]
___
talk-latam mailing list
talk-latam@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-latam

Re: [Talk-it] Ultimo post sulla direttiva ue

[Luigi Toscano]

Andrea Enzo ha scritto:
Prima bisognerebbe leggere la direttiva approvata, poi potremo trarre le 
conclusioni.

Sbaglio?



I commenti scritti finora (come quel blog, ma anche da wikimedia e wikimedia 
Italia, e tanti altri che hanno opposto i due articoli controversi) riguardano 
la direttiva per come è stata approvata (l'ultima versione discussa non è 
cambiata).


Si può poi fare un ragionamento su come sarà implementata nei vari stati, ma 
non cambia il fatto che i problemi si moltiplicheranno con possibilità di 
diverse interpretazioni, perché quei due articoli contengono ambiguità.


--
Luigi


___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] R: Tag place

[Max1234Ita]

Andy Townsend wrote
> On 19/03/2019 15:43, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>>
>>
>> I'm happy with the editing done but I cannot comment on the following 
>> places which are still not reverted:
>>
> (...)
>> Sondrio
>> 
*
> Varzi
*
>> Verbania
>> Vipiteno
>>
>>
> 
> Does anything need to be done with those?
> 
> Qualcosa deve essere fatto con quelli?
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Andy


In my opinion, Varzi should be classified as Town: it only has 3300
inhabitants but is the reference center for the whole "Alta valle Staffora".
Infrastructures present:
 - marketplace
 - various shops (not only for essential goods)
 - 2 pharmacies
 - schools (elementary, lower secondary)
 - hospital


[same in Italian]

Secondo me Varzi dovrebbe essere Town: ha solo 3300 abitanti ma è il centro
di riferimento per tutta l'"Alta valle Staffora".

Infrastrutture presenti:
 - mercato
 - vari negozi (non solo di beni di prima necessità)
 - 2 farmacie
 - Scuole elementari e medie inferiori
 - ospedale


"My cent".
Max.




--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] Ultimo post sulla direttiva ue

[Cascafico Giovanni]

Non so se con questo titolo lapidario intendi chiudere la questione con un
semplice: "OSM ne è fuori".

IMHO non è così: ci sono per fortuna) un mucchio di servizio commerciali
che si appoggiano sulla nostra piattaforma.

Il nostro vantaggio su google maps ERA che non abbiamo un controllo
centralizzato.
Ricordate il fallimento del loro editor di mappe? Nonostante le
immensamente superiori risorse, non potevano garantire uno standard di
qualità perché dovevano controllare ogni edit.

Ora quello che ci aspetta è lo stesso fardello. Reagire velocemente e
globalmente a qualsiasi upload protetto da copyright. Per non citare poi i
casini che nasceranno quando i revert di un ipotetico gruppo di controllori
andranno in conflitto con eventuali correzioni individuali.
Insomma, la forza del mapping condiviso potrebbe trasformarsi in un punto
di debolezza estrema, varco persino troppo facile per sabotaggi esterni.

Per il resto, la direttiva ed i suoi numerosi, indeterminati avverbi apre
la strada non ad ottimistici scenari di libertà, ma a congrue parcelle di
legali specializzati.

Il gio 28 mar 2019, 09:51 Alessandro  ha scritto:

> Dai quotidiani on line di stamattina:
>
> "La direttiva prevede eccezioni per le piccole e medie imprese e per le
> start up – con meno di 5 milioni di utenti unici al mese e meno di 10
> milioni di fatturato l’anno – che saranno soggette a vincoli meno
> stringenti rispetto alle grandi piattaforme. Le restrizioni sul diritto
> d’autore non saranno inoltre applicate ai contenuti utilizzati per
> l’insegnamento e la ricerca scientifica. Infondati i timori che a pagare
> possano essere gli utenti della rete, per i quali non è previsto alcun
> pagamento del diritto d’autore, né da parte di singoli privati né da parte
> di piattaforme, che non hanno fini di lucro, come anche enciclopedie on
> line, ad esempio Wikipedia, che potranno attingere gratuitamente ai
> contenuti dal web"
>
> Se è giusto OpenStreetMap può serenamente dimenticarsi che esiste la
> direttiva.
>
> Ciao
>
> Alessandro
> --
>
>
> ___
> Talk-it mailing list
> Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
>
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] Ultimo post sulla direttiva ue

[Andrea Enzo]

Prima bisognerebbe leggere la direttiva approvata, poi potremo trarre le 
conclusioni. 
Sbaglio? 

Il 28 marzo 2019 15:07:44 CET, totera  ha scritto:
>Alessandro-2 wrote
>> Io non ne ho nessuna, ma possiamo essere tutti d'accordo che ciò che 
>> interessa questa lista, OpenStreetMap, non verrà disturbata dalla
>> direttiva.
>
>Sul blog ufficiale [1] la posizione è un po' più articolata.
>
>Ciao,
>Gianluca
>
>[1] =
>https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2019/03/21/the-eu-copyright-directive-threatens-openstreetmap/
>
>
>
>--
>Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html
>
>___
>Talk-it mailing list
>Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

-- 
Inviato dal mio dispositivo Android con K-9 Mail. Perdonate la brevità.___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import

[Roman Auriti]

Thanks for sharing those, Nate. I like using PostGIS and I would be happy
to help the community clean geometries. Is there anyone in Calgary on the
mailing list?

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 8:20 AM john whelan  wrote:

> The trade off is if it can be used elsewhere then there is a benefit for
> using open source software however if it's only going to be used once here
> and we have someone who knows the proprietary software very well the data
> that ends up in OSM doesn't really care how it was produced.
>
> This is more a religious argument.
>
> Lots of people run OSM applications on Windows and Android both if which
> are proprietary ran than on an open source version of Unix.
>
> Cheerio John
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019, 10:04 AM Roman Auriti, 
> wrote:
>
>> Why is it that FME seems to be a tool that's OK to use for OSM when
>> someone replied that they could use PostGIS and was shut down by someone
>> else replying  'I'm not installing postgesql for you to accept
>> simplification'? Does anyone else find it a little ironic that the
>> community would move forward with proprietary software over open software?
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 7:46 AM Begin Daniel  wrote:
>>
>>> Buildings where there is no available municipal data
>>>
>>> Sent from Galaxy S7
>>>
>>> --
>>> *From:* John Whelan 
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 28, 2019 9:32:32 AM
>>> *To:* Begin Daniel
>>> *Cc:* Talk-ca; keith hartley
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import
>>>
>>> Are you talking about the older CANVEC data or the data that Stats has
>>> released which is really municipal data?
>>>
>>> Thanks John
>>>
>>> Begin Daniel wrote on 2019-03-28 8:31 AM:
>>>
>>> Someone has compared Bing and Canvec data in rural areas?
>>>
>>> Sent from Galaxy S7
>>>
>>> --
>>> *From:* OSM Volunteer stevea 
>>> 
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 27, 2019 11:52:02 PM
>>> *To:* Talk-ca
>>> *Cc:* keith hartley
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import
>>>
>>> Ah, good dialog ensues.  Municipality by municipality, in conjunction
>>> with BOTH the StatsCan and Bing data, the right things are getting noticed,
>>> the right things are getting human-realized at what the next steps are to
>>> do.  It gets better.
>>>
>>> Yay.  Stitch it together.  One municipality at a time.  One province at
>>> a time.  Pretty soon, after a few revisions of data and back-and-forths
>>> between municipalities and province-wide data checking, you've got
>>> something.  There, you go.
>>>
>>> SteveA
>>>
>>> > On Mar 27, 2019, at 8:23 PM, keith hartley 
>>>  wrote:
>>> >
>>> > The patchwork of municipalities is at least useful, before we didn't
>>> have a framework for adding this data, but at least we do now thanks to the
>>> umbrella license @ Stats Canada. We're a big country with very few, but
>>> very skilled OSM mappers (IE gecho111 mapped all of regina's building
>>> footprints! ).
>>> >
>>> > I like the concept of the Bing data, but they may have to do another
>>> few tries, or maybe retain their Neural network. - Is there anywhere where
>>> the Bing data looks nice? I found burbs in Winnipeg not bad, but there's
>>> some really weird elements when the source data is too simple (buildings in
>>> the middle of fields) or too complex (urban cores)
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 6:29 AM John Whelan 
>>>  wrote:
>>> > The Stats Canada data comes from the municipalities.  Unfortunately
>>> there are over 3,000 in Canada so yes ideally each would be treated
>>> separately in reality each municipality doesn't have a group of skilled OSM
>>> mappers who are capable of setting up an import plan and doing the work
>>> although there is nothing to stop them doing so.
>>> >
>>> > Cheerio John
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Talk-ca mailing list
>>> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Talk-ca mailing 
>>> listTalk-ca@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from Postbox
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> Talk-ca mailing list
>>> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>>
>>
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Re: [Talk-it] come lo mappo?

[demon_box]

Andrea Musuruane wrote
> Ciao,
>direi historic=memorial + memorial=statue.

si grazie, direi che non fa una piega ;-)

--enrico





--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

[Talk-es] Consulta para modificar portales

[francisco jose rosano lopez]

Buenas, estoy empezando y me gustaría saber si hay forma de cambiar
portales de las calles varios a la vez o varios en un tramo.

Gracias.

--
___
Talk-es mailing list
Talk-es@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import

[john whelan]

The trade off is if it can be used elsewhere then there is a benefit for
using open source software however if it's only going to be used once here
and we have someone who knows the proprietary software very well the data
that ends up in OSM doesn't really care how it was produced.

This is more a religious argument.

Lots of people run OSM applications on Windows and Android both if which
are proprietary ran than on an open source version of Unix.

Cheerio John

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019, 10:04 AM Roman Auriti,  wrote:

> Why is it that FME seems to be a tool that's OK to use for OSM when
> someone replied that they could use PostGIS and was shut down by someone
> else replying  'I'm not installing postgesql for you to accept
> simplification'? Does anyone else find it a little ironic that the
> community would move forward with proprietary software over open software?
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 7:46 AM Begin Daniel  wrote:
>
>> Buildings where there is no available municipal data
>>
>> Sent from Galaxy S7
>>
>> --
>> *From:* John Whelan 
>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 28, 2019 9:32:32 AM
>> *To:* Begin Daniel
>> *Cc:* Talk-ca; keith hartley
>> *Subject:* Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import
>>
>> Are you talking about the older CANVEC data or the data that Stats has
>> released which is really municipal data?
>>
>> Thanks John
>>
>> Begin Daniel wrote on 2019-03-28 8:31 AM:
>>
>> Someone has compared Bing and Canvec data in rural areas?
>>
>> Sent from Galaxy S7
>>
>> --
>> *From:* OSM Volunteer stevea 
>> 
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 27, 2019 11:52:02 PM
>> *To:* Talk-ca
>> *Cc:* keith hartley
>> *Subject:* Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import
>>
>> Ah, good dialog ensues.  Municipality by municipality, in conjunction
>> with BOTH the StatsCan and Bing data, the right things are getting noticed,
>> the right things are getting human-realized at what the next steps are to
>> do.  It gets better.
>>
>> Yay.  Stitch it together.  One municipality at a time.  One province at a
>> time.  Pretty soon, after a few revisions of data and back-and-forths
>> between municipalities and province-wide data checking, you've got
>> something.  There, you go.
>>
>> SteveA
>>
>> > On Mar 27, 2019, at 8:23 PM, keith hartley 
>>  wrote:
>> >
>> > The patchwork of municipalities is at least useful, before we didn't
>> have a framework for adding this data, but at least we do now thanks to the
>> umbrella license @ Stats Canada. We're a big country with very few, but
>> very skilled OSM mappers (IE gecho111 mapped all of regina's building
>> footprints! ).
>> >
>> > I like the concept of the Bing data, but they may have to do another
>> few tries, or maybe retain their Neural network. - Is there anywhere where
>> the Bing data looks nice? I found burbs in Winnipeg not bad, but there's
>> some really weird elements when the source data is too simple (buildings in
>> the middle of fields) or too complex (urban cores)
>> >
>> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 6:29 AM John Whelan 
>>  wrote:
>> > The Stats Canada data comes from the municipalities.  Unfortunately
>> there are over 3,000 in Canada so yes ideally each would be treated
>> separately in reality each municipality doesn't have a group of skilled OSM
>> mappers who are capable of setting up an import plan and doing the work
>> although there is nothing to stop them doing so.
>> >
>> > Cheerio John
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Talk-ca mailing list
>> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Talk-ca mailing 
>> listTalk-ca@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from Postbox
>> 
>> ___
>> Talk-ca mailing list
>> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>
>
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import

[Nate Wessel]

I agree that the use of closed software for this is not ideal, though I 
think it's far from the most worrying thing about this whole process. 
Perhaps that says more about the rest of the process though... I'm glad 
we're at least talking about cleaning up the data now!


If anyone is interested, I've documented some open-source code for 
cleaning up building geometries for another import: 
https://github.com/Nate-Wessel/hamilton-import


Some of the same PostGIS scripts could easily be reused here, especially 
the simplification step, which takes account of any shared walls.


Best,

Nate Wessel
Jack of all trades, Master of Geography, PhD candidate in Urban Planning
NateWessel.com 

On 3/28/19 10:03 AM, Roman Auriti wrote:
Why is it that FME seems to be a tool that's OK to use for OSM when 
someone replied that they could use PostGIS and was shut down by 
someone else replying  'I'm not installing postgesql for you to accept 
simplification'? Does anyone else find it a little ironic that the 
community would move forward with proprietary software over open 
software?


On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 7:46 AM Begin Daniel > wrote:


Buildings where there is no available municipal data

Sent from Galaxy S7


*From:* John Whelan mailto:jwhelan0...@gmail.com>>
*Sent:* Thursday, March 28, 2019 9:32:32 AM
*To:* Begin Daniel
*Cc:* Talk-ca; keith hartley
*Subject:* Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import
Are you talking about the older CANVEC data or the data that Stats
has released which is really municipal data?

Thanks John

Begin Daniel wrote on 2019-03-28 8:31 AM:

Someone has compared Bing and Canvec data in rural areas?

Sent from Galaxy S7


*From:* OSM Volunteer stevea 

*Sent:* Wednesday, March 27, 2019 11:52:02 PM
*To:* Talk-ca
*Cc:* keith hartley
*Subject:* Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import
Ah, good dialog ensues.  Municipality by municipality, in
conjunction with BOTH the StatsCan and Bing data, the right
things are getting noticed, the right things are getting
human-realized at what the next steps are to do.  It gets better.

Yay.  Stitch it together.  One municipality at a time.  One
province at a time.  Pretty soon, after a few revisions of data
and back-and-forths between municipalities and province-wide data
checking, you've got something.  There, you go.

SteveA

> On Mar 27, 2019, at 8:23 PM, keith hartley
  wrote:
>
> The patchwork of municipalities is at least useful, before we
didn't have a framework for adding this data, but at least we do
now thanks to the umbrella license @ Stats Canada. We're a big
country with very few, but very skilled OSM mappers (IE gecho111
mapped all of regina's building footprints! ).
>
> I like the concept of the Bing data, but they may have to do
another few tries, or maybe retain their Neural network. - Is
there anywhere where the Bing data looks nice? I found burbs in
Winnipeg not bad, but there's some really weird elements when the
source data is too simple (buildings in the middle of fields) or
too complex (urban cores)
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 6:29 AM John Whelan
  wrote:
> The Stats Canada data comes from the municipalities. 
Unfortunately there are over 3,000 in Canada so yes ideally each
would be treated separately in reality each municipality doesn't
have a group of skilled OSM mappers who are capable of setting up
an import plan and doing the work although there is nothing to
stop them doing so.
>
> Cheerio John


___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org 
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org  
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


-- 
Sent from Postbox



___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org 
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Re: [Talk-it] Ultimo post sulla direttiva ue

[totera]

Alessandro-2 wrote
> Io non ne ho nessuna, ma possiamo essere tutti d'accordo che ciò che 
> interessa questa lista, OpenStreetMap, non verrà disturbata dalla
> direttiva.

Sul blog ufficiale [1] la posizione è un po' più articolata.

Ciao,
Gianluca

[1] =
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2019/03/21/the-eu-copyright-directive-threatens-openstreetmap/



--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html

___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [OSM-ja] 北海道拓殖バスインポートの進捗について/

[石野貴之]

石野@yumean1119です。

＞ 北光社さん
返信ありがとうございます。

ご意見いただいた中で結論に至っていないのが、
>
> ・インポート用のアカウントはプロジェクト毎に作るべきか、本アカウントに対して1個作って複数のプロジェクトで使用するべきか
> 私は1個あればいいと考えていました。
>
> ・name:ja-Latnのローマ字長音の扱いについて
>  私の案は訓令式（長音にōなどのマクロン付母音を使用）で作成していますが、ヘボン式（長音を区別しない）によるべきではないかとの意見がありました。
>

これについては私にはちょっとわからないです。申し訳ないです。

これらを保留したままでもwiki英語ページの作成などインポート本番の直前までは進められるのですが、実際に作業に着手できるのは4月中旬以降になると思います。
>

どうぞご無理はなさらないでください。それでは。

石野 貴之
yumean1...@gmail.com

>
___
Talk-ja mailing list
Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import

[Roman Auriti]

Why is it that FME seems to be a tool that's OK to use for OSM when someone
replied that they could use PostGIS and was shut down by someone else
replying  'I'm not installing postgesql for you to accept simplification'?
Does anyone else find it a little ironic that the community would move
forward with proprietary software over open software?

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 7:46 AM Begin Daniel  wrote:

> Buildings where there is no available municipal data
>
> Sent from Galaxy S7
>
> --
> *From:* John Whelan 
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 28, 2019 9:32:32 AM
> *To:* Begin Daniel
> *Cc:* Talk-ca; keith hartley
> *Subject:* Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import
>
> Are you talking about the older CANVEC data or the data that Stats has
> released which is really municipal data?
>
> Thanks John
>
> Begin Daniel wrote on 2019-03-28 8:31 AM:
>
> Someone has compared Bing and Canvec data in rural areas?
>
> Sent from Galaxy S7
>
> --
> *From:* OSM Volunteer stevea 
> 
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 27, 2019 11:52:02 PM
> *To:* Talk-ca
> *Cc:* keith hartley
> *Subject:* Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import
>
> Ah, good dialog ensues.  Municipality by municipality, in conjunction with
> BOTH the StatsCan and Bing data, the right things are getting noticed, the
> right things are getting human-realized at what the next steps are to do.
> It gets better.
>
> Yay.  Stitch it together.  One municipality at a time.  One province at a
> time.  Pretty soon, after a few revisions of data and back-and-forths
> between municipalities and province-wide data checking, you've got
> something.  There, you go.
>
> SteveA
>
> > On Mar 27, 2019, at 8:23 PM, keith hartley 
>  wrote:
> >
> > The patchwork of municipalities is at least useful, before we didn't
> have a framework for adding this data, but at least we do now thanks to the
> umbrella license @ Stats Canada. We're a big country with very few, but
> very skilled OSM mappers (IE gecho111 mapped all of regina's building
> footprints! ).
> >
> > I like the concept of the Bing data, but they may have to do another few
> tries, or maybe retain their Neural network. - Is there anywhere where the
> Bing data looks nice? I found burbs in Winnipeg not bad, but there's some
> really weird elements when the source data is too simple (buildings in the
> middle of fields) or too complex (urban cores)
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 6:29 AM John Whelan 
>  wrote:
> > The Stats Canada data comes from the municipalities.  Unfortunately
> there are over 3,000 in Canada so yes ideally each would be treated
> separately in reality each municipality doesn't have a group of skilled OSM
> mappers who are capable of setting up an import plan and doing the work
> although there is nothing to stop them doing so.
> >
> > Cheerio John
>
>
> ___
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
>
> ___
> Talk-ca mailing 
> listTalk-ca@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
>
> --
> Sent from Postbox
> 
> ___
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import

[Begin Daniel]

Buildings where there is no available municipal data

Sent from Galaxy S7


From: John Whelan 
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 9:32:32 AM
To: Begin Daniel
Cc: Talk-ca; keith hartley
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import

Are you talking about the older CANVEC data or the data that Stats has released 
which is really municipal data?

Thanks John

Begin Daniel wrote on 2019-03-28 8:31 AM:
Someone has compared Bing and Canvec data in rural areas?

Sent from Galaxy S7


From: OSM Volunteer stevea 

Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 11:52:02 PM
To: Talk-ca
Cc: keith hartley
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import

Ah, good dialog ensues.  Municipality by municipality, in conjunction with BOTH 
the StatsCan and Bing data, the right things are getting noticed, the right 
things are getting human-realized at what the next steps are to do.  It gets 
better.

Yay.  Stitch it together.  One municipality at a time.  One province at a time. 
 Pretty soon, after a few revisions of data and back-and-forths between 
municipalities and province-wide data checking, you've got something.  There, 
you go.

SteveA

> On Mar 27, 2019, at 8:23 PM, keith hartley 
>  wrote:
>
> The patchwork of municipalities is at least useful, before we didn't have a 
> framework for adding this data, but at least we do now thanks to the umbrella 
> license @ Stats Canada. We're a big country with very few, but very skilled 
> OSM mappers (IE gecho111 mapped all of regina's building footprints! ).
>
> I like the concept of the Bing data, but they may have to do another few 
> tries, or maybe retain their Neural network. - Is there anywhere where the 
> Bing data looks nice? I found burbs in Winnipeg not bad, but there's some 
> really weird elements when the source data is too simple (buildings in the 
> middle of fields) or too complex (urban cores)
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 6:29 AM John Whelan 
>  wrote:
> The Stats Canada data comes from the municipalities.  Unfortunately there are 
> over 3,000 in Canada so yes ideally each would be treated separately in 
> reality each municipality doesn't have a group of skilled OSM mappers who are 
> capable of setting up an import plan and doing the work although there is 
> nothing to stop them doing so.
>
> Cheerio John


___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca



___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


--
Sent from 
Postbox
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import

[John Whelan]

Are you talking about the older CANVEC data or the data that Stats has 
released which is really municipal data?


Thanks John

Begin Daniel wrote on 2019-03-28 8:31 AM:

Someone has compared Bing and Canvec data in rural areas?

Sent from Galaxy S7


*From:* OSM Volunteer stevea 
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 27, 2019 11:52:02 PM
*To:* Talk-ca
*Cc:* keith hartley
*Subject:* Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import
Ah, good dialog ensues.  Municipality by municipality, in conjunction 
with BOTH the StatsCan and Bing data, the right things are getting 
noticed, the right things are getting human-realized at what the next 
steps are to do.  It gets better.


Yay.  Stitch it together.  One municipality at a time.  One province 
at a time.  Pretty soon, after a few revisions of data and 
back-and-forths between municipalities and province-wide data 
checking, you've got something.  There, you go.


SteveA

> On Mar 27, 2019, at 8:23 PM, keith hartley  wrote:
> 
> The patchwork of municipalities is at least useful, before we didn't have a framework for adding this data, but at least we do now 
thanks to the umbrella license @ Stats Canada. We're a big country 
with very few, but very skilled OSM mappers (IE gecho111 mapped all of 
regina's building footprints! ).
> 
> I like the concept of the Bing data, but they may have to do another few tries, or maybe retain their Neural network. - Is there 
anywhere where the Bing data looks nice? I found burbs in Winnipeg not 
bad, but there's some really weird elements when the source data is 
too simple (buildings in the middle of fields) or too complex (urban 
cores)
> 
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 6:29 AM John Whelan  wrote:
> The Stats Canada data comes from the municipalities.  Unfortunately there are over 3,000 in Canada so yes ideally each would be treated 
separately in reality each municipality doesn't have a group of 
skilled OSM mappers who are capable of setting up an import plan and 
doing the work although there is nothing to stop them doing so.
> 
> Cheerio John



___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca


--
Sent from Postbox 

___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Re: [Talk-es] Presentación y primera duda

[boina]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512


El 27/3/19 a las 22:52, Jordi Miró Ferrer escribió:
> Hola y bienvenido a la comunidad de OSM.

Hola, muchas gracias.

> 
> ¿Podrías indicarnos de qué calle se trata y en qué ciudad? En el edito
r
> por defecto que puedes encontrar en www.openstreetmap.org
>  (se llama iD) hay una opción para divid
ir
> una vía a partir de un nodo situado en dicha vía. En tu caso, puedes
> consultar la capa de Catastro (en lugar de las ortofotos de PNOA) para
> ver dónde termina el nombre de una calle y empieza la siguiente. Si no
> está claro, puedes guiarte por la numeración de las casas (fíjate a
> partir de qué casa empieza la numeración).

La calle existente es Carcavilla en Móstoles, la que no está es Pintor
Zurbarán, el punto de encuentro es donde termina Pintor Zurbarán, en la
capa de catastro si están las dos calles, pero no termino de ver claro
donde está la separación, por ejemplo el número 11 de Pintor Zurbarán
estaría en la prolongación de Caracavilla, tal vez se puede entender que
la curva pertenece a Pintor Zurbarán.

> 
> Saludos,

Saludos

> Jordi MF
> 
> --
- --
> *De:* bo...@disroot.org 
> *Enviat el:* dimecres, 27 de març de 2019 18:10
> *Per a:* talk-es@openstreetmap.org
> *Tema:* [Talk-es] Presentación y primera duda
>  
> 
> Hola a todos.
> 
> Sirva este correo para presentarme y explicar un poco como he llegado
> hasta aquí.
> 
> No soy ningún experto en esto de la cartografía, me resulta atractivo
> esto de OSM por lo que tiene de útil y de trabajo comunitario.
> 
> Como tengo algo de tiempo libre, me gustaría completar algunos datos d
e
> mi barrio, no hay mucho que hacer: los números de los portales, algún
> comercio que ha cambiado de local comercial, poco más.
> 
> Sin embargo me he encontrado con que una calle que al pasar una curva
> cambia de nombre, pero en el mapeo está completa con el nombre inicial
,
> es precisamente la calle donde vivo. No sé que parte de la curva
> pertenece a cada calle y tampoco sé como podría editar para reflejar l
a
> calle después de la curva.
> 
> Saludos y gracias de antemano
> 
> ___
> Talk-es mailing list
> Talk-es@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es
> 
> ___
> Talk-es mailing list
> Talk-es@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es
> 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=oKE4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Talk-es mailing list
Talk-es@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import

[Begin Daniel]

Someone has compared Bing and Canvec data in rural areas?

Sent from Galaxy S7


From: OSM Volunteer stevea 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 11:52:02 PM
To: Talk-ca
Cc: keith hartley
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import

Ah, good dialog ensues.  Municipality by municipality, in conjunction with BOTH 
the StatsCan and Bing data, the right things are getting noticed, the right 
things are getting human-realized at what the next steps are to do.  It gets 
better.

Yay.  Stitch it together.  One municipality at a time.  One province at a time. 
 Pretty soon, after a few revisions of data and back-and-forths between 
municipalities and province-wide data checking, you've got something.  There, 
you go.

SteveA

> On Mar 27, 2019, at 8:23 PM, keith hartley  wrote:
>
> The patchwork of municipalities is at least useful, before we didn't have a 
> framework for adding this data, but at least we do now thanks to the umbrella 
> license @ Stats Canada. We're a big country with very few, but very skilled 
> OSM mappers (IE gecho111 mapped all of regina's building footprints! ).
>
> I like the concept of the Bing data, but they may have to do another few 
> tries, or maybe retain their Neural network. - Is there anywhere where the 
> Bing data looks nice? I found burbs in Winnipeg not bad, but there's some 
> really weird elements when the source data is too simple (buildings in the 
> middle of fields) or too complex (urban cores)
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 6:29 AM John Whelan  wrote:
> The Stats Canada data comes from the municipalities.  Unfortunately there are 
> over 3,000 in Canada so yes ideally each would be treated separately in 
> reality each municipality doesn't have a group of skilled OSM mappers who are 
> capable of setting up an import plan and doing the work although there is 
> nothing to stop them doing so.
>
> Cheerio John


___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Re: [talk-au] Bushwalking site using OSM

[Sebastian Spiess]

Hi Andrew,
looking nice. I'll try to follow your suggestion for a pull request to
add the walk around Narrabeen Lake.

Cheers,
Seb

On 27/3/19 11:17 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> I just launched a new map based on OSM
> data https://www.beyondtracks.com/map/
>
> It aims to show much more detail at low zoom levels compared to most
> OSM map styles out there.
>
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 at 18:03, Andrew Harvey  > wrote:
>
> I just wanted to share a project I've been working on recently, which
> provides bush walking information, mainly in NSW.
>
> http://beyondtracks.com/
>
> Most of the route geometries have come from OpenStreetMap, the
> basemaps are using OpenStreetMap, I've pulled in points of interest
> along the walk from OpenStreetMap and the search uses names of
> features near the walk from OpenStreetMap.
>
>
> ___
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Bushwalking site using OSM

[Ian Bennett]

Fabulous. Expect a few next week :-)

On 28/3/19 10:06 pm, Andrew Harvey wrote:

Hi Ian, Absolutely, most importantly if anything is missing in OSM, then add it 
in.

The walks database I use is open source at https://gitlab.com/beyondtracks/beyondtracks-walks you 
can open a new issue there for any missing walks or problems, or if you're keen you can send a merge 
request, but an issue is sufficient.


On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 18:59, Ian Bennett mailto:ibenn...@tpg.com.au>> wrote:

Andrew,
         Can anyone contribute?? If so, can you advise the hows and whats 
please.
         We are heading up to Weddin NP (near Grenfell, NSW) to do a few 
"stomps" and I always
take my
GPSMap60CSX when we go.

Ian

On 28/3/19 7:56 am, Dion Moult wrote:
 > This site looks fantastic Andrew! You should do a little blog post or 
something about the
 > under-the-hood on how it all works. That can help others create the same 
:)
 >
 >
 > Sent from ProtonMail mobile
 >
 >
 >
 >  Original Message 
 > On 27 Mar. 2019, 11:17 pm, Andrew Harvey < andrew.harv...@gmail.com
> wrote:
 >
 >
 >     I just launched a new map based on OSM data 
https://www.beyondtracks.com/map/
 >
 >     It aims to show much more detail at low zoom levels compared to most 
OSM map styles out
there.
 >
 >     On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 at 18:03, Andrew Harvey mailto:andrew.harv...@gmail.com>
 >     >> 
wrote:
 >
 >         I just wanted to share a project I've been working on recently, 
which
 >         provides bush walking information, mainly in NSW.
 >
 > http://beyondtracks.com/
 >
 >         Most of the route geometries have come from OpenStreetMap, the
 >         basemaps are using OpenStreetMap, I've pulled in points of 
interest
 >         along the walk from OpenStreetMap and the search uses names of
 >         features near the walk from OpenStreetMap.
 >
 >
 > ___
 > Talk-au mailing list
 > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org 
 > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
 >



___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Bushwalking site using OSM

[Andrew Harvey]

Hi Ian, Absolutely, most importantly if anything is missing in OSM, then
add it in.

The walks database I use is open source at
https://gitlab.com/beyondtracks/beyondtracks-walks you can open a new issue
there for any missing walks or problems, or if you're keen you can send a
merge request, but an issue is sufficient.

On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 18:59, Ian Bennett  wrote:

> Andrew,
> Can anyone contribute?? If so, can you advise the hows and whats
> please.
> We are heading up to Weddin NP (near Grenfell, NSW) to do a few
> "stomps" and I always take my
> GPSMap60CSX when we go.
>
> Ian
>
> On 28/3/19 7:56 am, Dion Moult wrote:
> > This site looks fantastic Andrew! You should do a little blog post or
> something about the
> > under-the-hood on how it all works. That can help others create the same
> :)
> >
> >
> > Sent from ProtonMail mobile
> >
> >
> >
> >  Original Message 
> > On 27 Mar. 2019, 11:17 pm, Andrew Harvey < andrew.harv...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I just launched a new map based on OSM data
> https://www.beyondtracks.com/map/
> >
> > It aims to show much more detail at low zoom levels compared to most
> OSM map styles out there.
> >
> > On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 at 18:03, Andrew Harvey  > > wrote:
> >
> > I just wanted to share a project I've been working on recently,
> which
> > provides bush walking information, mainly in NSW.
> >
> > http://beyondtracks.com/
> >
> > Most of the route geometries have come from OpenStreetMap, the
> > basemaps are using OpenStreetMap, I've pulled in points of
> interest
> > along the walk from OpenStreetMap and the search uses names of
> > features near the walk from OpenStreetMap.
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Talk-au mailing list
> > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
> >
>
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [Talk-is] Heimild til að nota ljósmyndir Já 360 / Permission to use Já 360 photographs

[Svavar Kjarrval]

Hæ.

Takk kærlega fyrir heimildina.

Er einhver möguleiki til að komast að aldri hverrar myndar þannig að
fólk geti sýnt aðgát þegar kemur að upplýsingum sem eru sérstaklega
líklegri til þess að vera úreldar eftir því sem tíminn líður?

Annað sem ég var að spá: Hefur Já verið að hugsa um að láta Já-bílinn
keyra aftur um allt landið eða einhver tiltekin svæði?

Með kveðju,
Svavar Kjarrval

On 21.2.2019 14:24, Matt Riggott wrote:
> Sæl öll,
>
> Ég skrifa á ensku svo allir sem nota OpenStreetMap geti lesið hann.
>
> I'm happy to announce that Já hf has given permission for OpenStreetMap 
> contributors to reference Já 360 street-level photographs when editing the 
> map.
>
> Just as an example, you could use the photo at the link below to survey which 
> companies are located in the building, the number of floors in the building, 
> and the street names shown on street signs. That sort of thing.
>
> 
>
> This permission covers our street-level photographs but not the satellite 
> images nor the tiled web map. We would ask that if you do use the images when 
> editing OpenStreetMap, please add a "source=Já 360" tag to the changeset.
>
> Happy mapping!
> M.
>


___
Talk-is mailing list
Talk-is@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-is

Re: [Talk-it] Ultimo post sulla direttiva ue

[Alessandro]

Il 28/03/2019 10:10, Andrea Albani ha scritto:


Questo estratto proviene originariamente da [1] con titolo "L’Europa 
mette fine al far west digitale: svolta epocale sul diritto d’autore" 
un titolo altisonante che fa da solo presagire i contenuti che infatti 
mi sembrano totalmente spostati a favore di questa direttiva che 
*personalmente ritengo scellerata e anacronistica.*



*Una posizione perfettamente rispettabile.*

Io non ne ho nessuna, ma possiamo essere tutti d'accordo che ciò che 
interessa questa lista, OpenStreetMap, non verrà disturbata dalla direttiva.


Altri che potrebbero dover mettere mani al portafoglio metteranno in 
campo le loro risorse per evitarlo, ovvio. Sono anche sicuro che ce la 
faranno.


Ciao

Alessandro


___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Des projets de construction pas sorti de terre !

[Vincent Bergeot]

Pour information,

il y a blocage des 3 utilisateurs évoqués dans ces courriels :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2622
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2621
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2620

à suivre donc


Le 23/03/2019 à 10:32, Vincent Bergeot a écrit :

Bonjour,


Le 22/03/2019 à 20:36, osm.sanspourr...@spamgourmet.com a écrit :

Le 22/03/2019 à 16:35, marc marc - marc_marc_...@hotmail.com a écrit :

PS: proposed: dans le wiki parle de projet qui ont bcp de chance
d'aboutir, une demande de permis c'est encore loin de cela non ?


Tu parles bien de demande de PC pas de PC ? Tu es en train de nous 
dire qu'ils mettent en ligne avant même d'avoir le PC. Là pour moi 
c'est revert d'abord, ensuite on réfléchit.


en fait nous n'en savons pas grand chose. Dans certains cas il est dit 
que par ces contributeurs qu'ils ont accès à des permis de construire 
et donc les rentrent dans osm, parfois la source est "projet 
machin-chose". Je constate surtout que :


  * il n'y a pas de réponses publiques sur les changesets,
  * qu'il y a des tentatives de changer le landuse pour que cela
reflète la réalité en laissant les "building=construction" sans
répondre aux commentaires,
  * qu'il y a superposition de building=contruction avec des building
existant
  * qu'il y a des arbres et autres décorations de projets
architecturales, avec les couleurs du bati pour des zones qui sont
encore totalement en friche,
  * que cela concerne des dizaines de changesets, si l'on considère
les 3 contributeurs évoqués, que l'on retrouve souvent dans les
mêmes zones, ce qui laisse imaginer de la contribution organisée
et structurée,
  * et beaucoup de temps consacrés par beaucoup de monde depuis
plusieurs mois, années maintenant.

Donc oui je suis pour :

  * le blocage



Le 22/03/2019 à 16:35, marc marc - marc_marc_...@hotmail.com a écrit :

PS2: reste aussi à voir qui se propose de faire la modif en proposed:
sur un millier de changeset... parce qu'un revert ce serra déjà long,
une modif c'est encore pire.


On ne peut extraire le .osm du change set et modifier les tag 
building en proposed:building ? C'est bourrin et s'ils modifient 
d'autres bâtiments on l'a dans le baba. Donc non trivial ?


Alors dire sur le changeset faute de réponse sous 8 jours (on a déjà 
dit avant), révert sera fait.



cela veut dire qu'il faut faire cela sur le millier de changeset ?

Pour le revert, assez favorable car souvent :

  * rien de visible en imagerie
  * rien sur le cadastre
  * et absent de mapillary ou autres quand images existantes
  * et régulièrement des building=construction par dessus du bati existant

Plus d'infos sur ces 3 contributeurs :

  * http://hdyc.neis-one.org/?L3mp1ck4, qui n'a quasiment pas
contribué l'année dernière, avec un profil pro (jours, heures de
boulot et josm à 99%), si on considère les 180 jours de
cartographie annuelle, les jours et heures de travail, c'est
quasiment du temps plein en 2017
  * http://hdyc.neis-one.org/?Dupuiche avec un profil pro (jours,
heures de boulot et josm à 99%), 110 jours de carto en 2018 !!!
aucune discussion et participation à aucune discussion, certaines
sont vieilles (avec du google map :

http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=146893),
plus les dernières citées dans ce fil de discussions
  * http://hdyc.neis-one.org/?Y43l avec un profil pro (jours, heures
de boulot et josm à 99%), 110 jours de carto en 2018 !!! aucune
discussion et participation à aucune discussion,

Je n'ai rien contre les pros dans osm, mais là clairement aucunes 
interactions, des sources discutables et des choses non-visibles !!!


Petite question : peut-on récupérer facilement tous les changesets 
"commentés"  d'un contributeur ?


à plus

--
Vincent Bergeot

___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr



--
Vincent Bergeot

___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [Talk-it] Ultimo post sulla direttiva ue

[Andrea Albani]

Il giorno gio 28 mar 2019 alle ore 09:51 Alessandro 
ha scritto:

> Dai quotidiani on line di stamattina:
>
> "La direttiva prevede eccezioni per le piccole e medie imprese e per le
> start up – con meno di 5 milioni di utenti unici al mese e meno di 10
> milioni di fatturato l’anno – che saranno soggette a vincoli meno
> stringenti rispetto alle grandi piattaforme. Le restrizioni sul diritto
> d’autore non saranno inoltre applicate ai contenuti utilizzati per
> l’insegnamento e la ricerca scientifica. Infondati i timori che a pagare
> possano essere gli utenti della rete, per i quali non è previsto alcun
> pagamento del diritto d’autore, né da parte di singoli privati né da parte
> di piattaforme, che non hanno fini di lucro, come anche enciclopedie on
> line, ad esempio Wikipedia, che potranno attingere gratuitamente ai
> contenuti dal web"
>
> Se è giusto OpenStreetMap può serenamente dimenticarsi che esiste la
> direttiva.
>
> Ciao
>
> Alessandro
>
>
Questo estratto proviene originariamente da [1] con titolo "L’Europa mette
fine al far west digitale: svolta epocale sul diritto d’autore" un titolo
altisonante che fa da solo presagire i contenuti che infatti mi sembrano
totalmente spostati a favore di questa direttiva che personalmente ritengo
scellerata e anacronistica.

E' chiaro che nella fase che si è chiusa col voto e in questa pre-attuativa
c'è stata è c'è la corsa da parte dei sostenitori per far passare messaggi
distensivi, ma i veri effetti li valuteremo dopo a legge scritta.
Secondo me sarà in quel momento che sapremo veramente se ci sarà qualcuno
che la sfrutterà per far valere i propri presunti diritti.

Ciao


[1]
https://www.vaticannews.va/it/mondo/news/2019-03/europa-mette-fine-far-west-digitale-svolta-epocale.html
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

[Talk-it] Ultimo post sulla direttiva ue

[Alessandro]

Dai quotidiani on line di stamattina:

"La direttiva prevede eccezioni per le piccole e medie imprese e per le 
start up – con meno di 5 milioni di utenti unici al mese e meno di 10 
milioni di fatturato l’anno – che saranno soggette a vincoli meno 
stringenti rispetto alle grandi piattaforme. Le restrizioni sul diritto 
d’autore non saranno inoltre applicate ai contenuti utilizzati per 
l’insegnamento e la ricerca scientifica. Infondati i timori che a pagare 
possano essere gli utenti della rete, per i quali non è previsto alcun 
pagamento del diritto d’autore, né da parte di singoli privati né da 
parte di piattaforme, che non hanno fini di lucro, come anche 
enciclopedie on line, ad esempio Wikipedia, che potranno attingere 
gratuitamente ai contenuti dal web"


Se è giusto OpenStreetMap può serenamente dimenticarsi che esiste la 
direttiva.


Ciao

Alessandro

--


___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

[talk-cz] WeeklyOSM CZ 452

[Tom Ka]

Ahoj, je dostupné vydání 452 týdeníku WeeklyOSM:

https://weeklyosm.eu/cz/archives/11729

* Relace s jedním členem.
* Testování 3D budov.
* Dokončen přesun serveru WeeklyOSM.
* Super relace route ano či ne?
* Lokální jazyky a písma v OSM.
* DoS útok na server OSM.
* Záplavy v Mozambiku a Zimbabwe.
* OSMTracker přišel o mapy.
* Novinky OpenRouteService.
* GIS a mapovací příběhy.
* Ulice beze jména.

Pěkné počtení ...

___
talk-cz mailing list
talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz

Re: [Talk-it] R: Tag place

[Andy Townsend]

On 19/03/2019 15:43, Andrea Musuruane wrote:



I'm happy with the editing done but I cannot comment on the following 
places which are still not reverted:


Cannobio
Canosa di Puglia
Carbonia
Casarano
Chiusa
Figline Valdarno
Incisa in Val d'Arno
Lana
Nuoro
Oristano
Ortisei
Ponte nelle Alpi
Ranica
Sedico
Silandro
Sondrio
Varzi
Verbania
Vipiteno




Does anything need to be done with those?

Qualcosa deve essere fatto con quelli?

Best Regards,

Andy


___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [talk-au] Bushwalking site using OSM

[Ian Bennett]

Andrew,
Can anyone contribute?? If so, can you advise the hows and whats please.
	We are heading up to Weddin NP (near Grenfell, NSW) to do a few "stomps" and I always take my 
GPSMap60CSX when we go.


Ian

On 28/3/19 7:56 am, Dion Moult wrote:
This site looks fantastic Andrew! You should do a little blog post or something about the 
under-the-hood on how it all works. That can help others create the same :)



Sent from ProtonMail mobile



 Original Message 
On 27 Mar. 2019, 11:17 pm, Andrew Harvey < andrew.harv...@gmail.com> wrote:


I just launched a new map based on OSM data 
https://www.beyondtracks.com/map/

It aims to show much more detail at low zoom levels compared to most OSM 
map styles out there.

On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 at 18:03, Andrew Harvey mailto:andrew.harv...@gmail.com>> wrote:

I just wanted to share a project I've been working on recently, which
provides bush walking information, mainly in NSW.

http://beyondtracks.com/

Most of the route geometries have come from OpenStreetMap, the
basemaps are using OpenStreetMap, I've pulled in points of interest
along the walk from OpenStreetMap and the search uses names of
features near the walk from OpenStreetMap.


___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au



___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Ile d'oléron - Rue en double et nom incluant les lieudit dans la BAN

[Jérôme Seigneuret]

PS on peut avoir en plus dans le listing "N'est pas une voie > lieudit ou
zonage"

Exemple les cités HLM, Lotissement, Zxxx Y, centre commercial X

C'est dans les 3/4 des temps des voies sans adresses.

Le jeu. 28 mars 2019 à 08:47, Jérôme Seigneuret 
a écrit :

> Arf je viens de voir que les lieudit sont aussi listés comme "voies sans
> adresses" et comme "lieudit"
>
> exemple
> OkErreur d'orthographeDivergence d'orthographeNom différentType de voie
> différentVoie doublon et type de voie différentVoie doublon avec
> orthographe différenteVoie doublon (même type et même nom)Répétition du
> type de voieNom introuvable sur le terrainAncien nom supprimé sur le
> terrainVoie détruiteNom tronquéVoie incorporée à une autreVoie 
> inexistanteAdresses
> hors périmètreErreur de communeErreurs combinées
> 17093B003A
>
> Le mer. 27 mars 2019 à 22:11, Vincent de Château-Thierry 
> a écrit :
>
>> Re-
>>
>> Le 27/03/2019 à 11:24, Vincent de Château-Thierry a écrit :
>> >
>> > Sur l'objet https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/270260638 pour moi tu as
>> fait ce qu'on a l'habitude de conseiller, donc là dessus rien à dire.
>> Après, il y a un souci entre ces données et leur bonne reprise dans BANO,
>> avec comme conséquence le rendu toujours rouge et
>> http://cadastre.openstreetmap.fr/fantoir/#insee=17093=0 qui indique
>> toujours pas de rapprochement pour cette rue. Je regarde pourquoi ce soir
>> et te dirai.
>>
>> En fait tes corrections sont bien prises en compte, mais du côté des
>> voies sans adresses :
>> http://cadastre.openstreetmap.fr/fantoir/#insee=17093=3
>>
>> C'est anormal (car on trouve des n° dans cette rue au Cadastre) mais ça
>> n'a rien à voir avec tes modifs, qui sont ok. Ce qui est ici en cause
>> c'est le cache du Cadastre dans la version actuelle de BANO, cache
>> incomplet et qu'il est devenu impossible de regénérer. Vivement la v2
>> pour assainir tout ça.
>>
>> vincent
>>
>> ___
>> Talk-fr mailing list
>> Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
>>
>
>
> --
> Cordialement,
> Jérôme Seigneuret
>


-- 
Cordialement,
Jérôme Seigneuret
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Ile d'oléron - Rue en double et nom incluant les lieudit dans la BAN

[Jérôme Seigneuret]

Arf je viens de voir que les lieudit sont aussi listés comme "voies sans
adresses" et comme "lieudit"

exemple
OkErreur d'orthographeDivergence d'orthographeNom différentType de voie
différentVoie doublon et type de voie différentVoie doublon avec
orthographe différenteVoie doublon (même type et même nom)Répétition du
type de voieNom introuvable sur le terrainAncien nom supprimé sur le
terrainVoie
détruiteNom tronquéVoie incorporée à une autreVoie inexistanteAdresses hors
périmètreErreur de communeErreurs combinées
17093B003A

Le mer. 27 mars 2019 à 22:11, Vincent de Château-Thierry 
a écrit :

> Re-
>
> Le 27/03/2019 à 11:24, Vincent de Château-Thierry a écrit :
> >
> > Sur l'objet https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/270260638 pour moi tu as
> fait ce qu'on a l'habitude de conseiller, donc là dessus rien à dire.
> Après, il y a un souci entre ces données et leur bonne reprise dans BANO,
> avec comme conséquence le rendu toujours rouge et
> http://cadastre.openstreetmap.fr/fantoir/#insee=17093=0 qui indique
> toujours pas de rapprochement pour cette rue. Je regarde pourquoi ce soir
> et te dirai.
>
> En fait tes corrections sont bien prises en compte, mais du côté des
> voies sans adresses :
> http://cadastre.openstreetmap.fr/fantoir/#insee=17093=3
>
> C'est anormal (car on trouve des n° dans cette rue au Cadastre) mais ça
> n'a rien à voir avec tes modifs, qui sont ok. Ce qui est ici en cause
> c'est le cache du Cadastre dans la version actuelle de BANO, cache
> incomplet et qu'il est devenu impossible de regénérer. Vivement la v2
> pour assainir tout ça.
>
> vincent
>
> ___
> Talk-fr mailing list
> Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
>


-- 
Cordialement,
Jérôme Seigneuret
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [Talk-it] come lo mappo?

[Andrea Musuruane]

Ciao,
   direi historic=memorial + memorial=statue. Non credo che sia un luogo
che attiri turisti quindi tourism=artwork + artwork_type=statue (che
comunque sarebbero in aggiunta) non vanno bene.

Ciao,

Andrea


On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:21 PM demon_box  wrote:

> ciao, come mappo questa installazione?
>
> <
> http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/file/t343727/IMG_5744_%281280_x_1024%29.jpg>
>
>
> è una specie di memoriale?
>
> ci sono 2 statue va bene comunque
>
> tourism=art_work
> artwork_type=statue  ?
>
> o cos'altro? non sò bene cosa fare...
>
> grazie
>
> --enrico
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html
>
> ___
> Talk-it mailing list
> Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
>
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

[talk-cz] Questionnaire

[Daniela Šedlárová]

Good day,

My name ist Daniela and I am a student of Geography at the University of
Presov (Slovakia), Faculty of Humanities and Natural Sciences.
In this way, I would like to ask you for participation in a short survey of
my thesis, which is designed for you, for contributors in the OpenStreetMap
project.

The collected data will be used solely for the purpose of processing my
work.
The It takes you about 10 minutes.
Thank you for your time and your willingness!

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdSZIjLltmnYjQ40hkX6lto5-rydEOxPGVBf8rBlcgA4S2kXg/viewform?usp=sf_link


Kind regards,
Daniela
___
talk-cz mailing list
talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz

[Talk-et] Questionnaire

[Daniela Šedlárová]

Good day,

My name ist Daniela and I am a student of Geography at the University of
Presov (Slovakia), Faculty of Humanities and Natural Sciences.
In this way, I would like to ask you for participation in a short survey of
my thesis, which is designed for you, for contributors in the OpenStreetMap
project.

The collected data will be used solely for the purpose of processing my
work.
The It takes you about 10 minutes.
Thank you for your time and your willingness!

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdSZIjLltmnYjQ40hkX6lto5-rydEOxPGVBf8rBlcgA4S2kXg/viewform?usp=sf_link


Kind regards,
Daniela
___
Talk-ET mailing list
Talk-ET@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-et