On 08/07/2010 03:35 PM, Anthony wrote:
I don't really see how there's an argument. If photoshop offers a
plugin that lets you draw a line with a certain thickness, a certain
color, and a label on it, and you use that photoshop plugin to make a
map, you've got a copyrighted work, and that
Am Freitag, den 06.08.2010, 22:48 +0200 schrieb Celso González:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 04:29:22PM -0400, Paul Houle wrote:
I just recently pointed my nooscope at places outside the U.S. and
was quite amused to see arabic letters in the tile maps around Tunis...
Looking around a
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 22:45 -0700, Sam Vekemans wrote:
it seems that fb cant use googlemaps as they are arch-rivals .
google tries to be its own facebook..
This is news to me, and obviously news to some fb developers who Ive
seen using googlemaps in their apps. 'Cities Ive visited' comes
oops,
i answered my own question.
i did a search and found out who the fb photo developer is, so i can
ask them directly.
cheers,
sam
On 8/7/10, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 22:45 -0700, Sam Vekemans wrote:
it seems that fb cant use googlemaps as they are
I took a quick look at some of the maps available at
http://parishmaps.lands.nsw.gov.au/ and there is some information
there that is not mapped (like school names, park names... etc.). I
was going to use them as a mapping source. Has anyone else used them
for this?
Legality wise, I would only use
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010, Andrew Harvey wrote:
I've collated a list of URLs of all the mrsid files (and an
index) they offer if anyone wanted to mass download them.
that would be handy as the site opens into a popup so if you have popup
windows blocked (like me) you get a blank page
...and some of the ones of the form PMapMN* in the parish list are also useful,
Parish Index: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=DukQYBmV
SID files: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=CAQiN7bt
(but I don't thing these two are complete lists)
___
Talk-au mailing
Am 5. August 2010 19:35 schrieb Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com:
Hi,
Da sich die Diskussion um das Tagging von Fahrradstraßen schon recht
lange hinzieht, habe ich mir mal die Freiheit genommen, den (aus meiner
Sicht) aktuellen Stand in einer neuen Wiki Seite zu dokumentieren:
Hallo,
für die Vereinskarte benötige ich einen Node um einen historischen
Waschkeller anzeigen zu können.
Es handelt sich dabei um einen öffentlich zugänglichen Keller in dem
Quellwasser durchfließt (laut Anschrift im Keller aber kein
Trinkwasser). Früher haben die Leute dort ihre Wäsche
Hallo,
im Wald sieht man bei uns regelmäßig Schilder, die die Waldgebiete
benennen. Echte Grenzen gibt es wohl nicht oder sind mir wenigstens
nicht bekannt, aber als Node könnte man das Gebiet schon grob mit Namen
versehen. Wie wird so ein Node eingetragen. Im Idealfall so, dass es
auch
Am Samstag 07 August 2010, 13:11:00 schrieb Manuel Reimer:
Hallo,
im Wald sieht man bei uns regelmäßig Schilder, die die Waldgebiete
benennen. Echte Grenzen gibt es wohl nicht oder sind mir wenigstens
nicht bekannt, aber als Node könnte man das Gebiet schon grob mit Namen
versehen. Wie wird
Hallo.
Am Samstag 07 August 2010, 13:11:00 schrieb Manuel Reimer:
im Wald sieht man bei uns regelmäßig Schilder, die die Waldgebiete
benennen. Echte Grenzen gibt es wohl nicht oder sind mir wenigstens
nicht bekannt, aber als Node könnte man das Gebiet schon grob mit Namen
versehen. Wie wird
Am 06.08.2010, 21:35 Uhr, schrieb Dimitri Junker o...@dimitri-junker.de:
Hallo
Pdf ist für den Ausdruck am besten. Bis auf die POI Icons sind alle
Elemente Vektorgrafiken.
...
Bist Du Dir da ganz sicher?
...
Jep! Ich habe es durch ganz einfaches ausprobieren herausgefunden.
Gruß
Hallo,
warum wird diese PLZ-Relation
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1112144
nicht im OSM Inspector angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/debug.html?view=plzlon=6.67436lat=51.20625zoom=13
Laut Relation-Check ist die Relation nicht unterbrochen und beim Tagging
habe ich auch
Am 07.08.2010 02:07, Tobias Knerr:
Hallo Liste,
(...) Außer einigen Gedankenspielen, Spezialthemen usw. habe ich
insbesondere zwei ausführliche Proposals gefunden, die sich auch mit
Haltestellen beschäftigen:
- Unified Stoparea[1]
- Oxomoa-ÖPNV-Schema[2]
In ihrer Zielsetzung scheinen sie sehr
ein Versuch, wöchentlich aus dem OSM-Universum Projekte, Neuigkeiten und
Diskussionen zusammenzutragen.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/osm%20dortmund/diary/11439___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Ja, ist jetzt in den Geohack eingebaut. Dazu hab ich heute noch eine Funktion
geschrieben, welche den Buffer
beim ersten verschieben der Karte auf 2 anhebt. Damit dürfte es kaum noch
Nachteile für den Nutzer geben.
Wäre vielleicht auch was fürs offizielle embed-Skript.
Grüße Kolossos
Kolossos
Hallo Alex,
am 07.08.2010 21:37 schrieb Alexander Matheisen:
warum wird diese PLZ-Relation
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1112144
nicht im OSM Inspector angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/debug.html?view=plzlon=6.67436lat=51.20625zoom=13
Laut Relation-Check ist die
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:15:18AM +0200, Elena of Valhalla wrote:
On 8/3/10, Daniele Forsi dfo...@gmail.com wrote:
scrollabile no di sicuro :-) lo Zingarelli dice che scrollare vuol
dire scuotere con forza e siccome non è solo scorrevole perché si
può cambiare l'ingrandimento, userei
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 11:04:09PM +0200, Luca Delucchi wrote:
Il 02 agosto 2010 22:57, Francesco de Virgilio fradev...@gmail.com ha
scritto:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 08:47:29PM +0200, Luca Delucchi wrote:
Voglio fare i miei complimenti a tutti i volenterosi che stanno
cimentandosi nelle
Ho tradotto un po' di tag nuovi nelle map features, ma ce ne sono tre che non
saprei cosa scrivere.
Sono access:lhv, access:bdouble e access:roadtrain.
Da quel che ho capito bdouble dovrebbe essere il classico autotreno (autocarro
davanti e rimorchio dietro), mentre roadtrain comprendere tutta
Hallo,
Wie sollte mit so einem Fehler umgegangen werden:
http://keepright.ipax.at/report_map.php?schema=10error=12557967
(uncassified und ein kleiner bach kreuzen sich)
Richte Brücke gibts da eigentlich keine.
Niko
___
Talk-at mailing list
Am 07.08.10 schrieb Niko Sams niko.s...@gmail.com:
Hallo,
Wie sollte mit so einem Fehler umgegangen werden:
http://keepright.ipax.at/report_map.php?schema=10error=12557967
(uncassified und ein kleiner bach kreuzen sich)
Richte Brücke gibts da eigentlich keine.
Niko
Der Grund für die
When I look at the cyclemap, I see red lines (NCN) and light blue lines
(RCN) for the Route Verte. I also see red lines tagged as RCN (I suspect
that the cyclemap rendering has not been updated for a while - my changes
made almost 3 weeks ago are not still there).
There was a discussion 2 years
I have found this: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Route_verte
It doesn't specify the type of network to apply (NCN vs RCN). Maybe it
should be added (once decided).
This page also suggest that the following tags applied:
*Type de voies* *Clef* *Valeur* Bande cyclable cycleway lane
sorry,
i get all excited when talking about the tct and ncn.
yes, the route de verte network in quebec should be ncn, and the
regional network exists where a route in continious passing through
towns, usually in a 'regional municapility'.
my fight continues, but as far as i know, im the
re: tagging
feel free to take a lead on it, the system looks good to me.
and ya, the cyclemap usually takes a week for something to render and
much longer for the ncn as its viewable from space.
cheers,
sam
On 8/7/10, Daniel Tremblay tremb...@gmail.com wrote:
I have found this:
Mám stejný problém, občas jim ty WMS servery holt vynechávají. Já jsem si
docela vystačil s UHULem, který funguoval až nad očekávání svižně :)
2010/8/6 Zdeněk Pražák zpra...@seznam.cz
při kreslení budov z katastrální mapy pomocí traceru a kontrole správnosti
zakreslení vodních ploch používám
Tak to vypadá, když dokážeme opak tvrzení, že? :-)
Mohli bychom briddleway označovat opravdu stezky pro koně? Tedy tuto značku
C11a http://www.koniny.ic.cz/uzitecnosti/index_Page315.htm Nevím jestli se
v reálu tyto někde vyskytují, ale podobné značky existují i pro cyklisty a
to implikuje
Bonjour,
Ayant réussi à réinstaller postgis en local, j'ai testé une requête pour
trouver les communes sans rue.
J'en trouve près de 9300, mais il y a des faux positifs.
Je mets la requête pour amélioration avant que ça devienne un module
genre osmose.
SELECT c.osm_id,
Le 7 août 2010 09:25, Vincent Pottier vpott...@gmail.com a écrit :
Bonjour,
Ayant réussi à réinstaller postgis en local, j'ai testé une requête pour
trouver les communes sans rue.
J'en trouve près de 9300, mais il y a des faux positifs.
Je mets la requête pour amélioration avant que ça
On 07/08/2010 12:52, Christian Quest wrote:
La table roads est moins complète que la line. D'ailleurs, j'avoue
ne pas avoir encore bien saisit la différence entre les 2.
D'après ce que j'ai lu quelque part, la table roads est une table
'rapide' pour mapnik pour le dessin des rues. Elle
Suite à des discussions ici même sur le rendu des caméras de
surveillance nous nous sommes rendu compte que le site donné en
référence sur la wiki n'est pas mis à jour du tout.
Un peu frusté, j'ai donc développé ma propre version pour le rendu des
caméras de surveillance, visible ici :
Le 07/08/2010 21:57, Pierre-Alain Dorange a écrit :
Suite à des discussions ici même sur le rendu des caméras de
surveillance nous nous sommes rendu compte que le site donné en
référence sur la wiki n'est pas mis à jour du tout.
Un peu frusté, j'ai donc développé ma propre version pour le rendu
Le samedi 07 août 2010, à 21:57:26 +0200, Pierre-Alain a écrit :
Suite à des discussions ici même sur le rendu des caméras de
surveillance nous nous sommes rendu compte que le site donné en
référence sur la wiki n'est pas mis à jour du tout.
Un peu frusté, j'ai donc développé ma propre
Bonjour
Il y a un gros problème de performance web avec ce site. Si les
performances dépendent beaucoup du nombre de caméras connues dans la base
(car elles sont affichées), alors vu le peu de caméras actuellement qu'il
doit j'imagine dans la base c'est catastrophique.
Attend toi à un nombre
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 10:05:55PM +0200, Frédéric Rodrigo wrote:
Le 07/08/2010 21:57, Pierre-Alain Dorange a écrit :
Suite à des discussions ici même sur le rendu des caméras de
surveillance nous nous sommes rendu compte que le site donné en
référence sur la wiki n'est pas mis à jour du tout.
manu1...@lavabit.com wrote:
Il y a un gros problème de performance web avec ce site. Si les
performances dépendent beaucoup du nombre de caméras connues dans la base
(car elles sont affichées), alors vu le peu de caméras actuellement qu'il
doit j'imagine dans la base c'est catastrophique.
En
Frédéric Rodrigo fred.rodr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Vos commentaires sont les bienvenues.
Tu fais charger bien trop de points à la fois par le client. J'ai
firefox qui me propose d'arreter le script tellement c'est long à charger.
En effet avec Firefox c'est très lent... Alors que Safari (mac)
arno a...@renevier.net wrote:
bah comme commentaire, je dirais que ça marche pas :)
j'ai une page blanche, et les messages d'erreur suivants:
Erreur : missing ] after element list
Fichier source : http://www.leretourdelautruche.com/map/cctv.js
Ligne : 37, Colonne : 6
Code source :
Le message suivant :
##
Bonjour,
Je suis nouveau dans OSM et je suis en train de cartografier mon village : Le
Poujol sur Orb dans lHérault à l'aide de JOSM.
- Certains éléments apparaisent dans l'onglet Modifier de OSM mais pas dans
l'onglet Voir :
le nom Place de
2010/8/7 fo...@letuffe.org
Une ruelle étroite peut se tagguer en highway=service à condition d'y
ajouter service=alley (j'aurais préféré un highway=alley mais ça s'est
fait comme ça). Sans ce détail important, on peut considérer que la voie
n'est qu'une voie de service qui pourrait effectivement
On 07/08/2010 22:34, Pierre-Alain Dorange wrote:
manu1...@lavabit.com wrote:
Il y a un gros problème de performance web avec ce site. Si les
performances dépendent beaucoup du nombre de caméras connues dans la base
(car elles sont affichées), alors vu le peu de caméras actuellement qu'il
On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 23:32:54 -0600, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
Rather than United Stated Highway 29 Frontage Road just U.S. 29
Frontage Road or maybe US 29 Frontage Road. Why. Because no will say
the formal out load.
Rather than Interstate 95 Frontage Road, just I-95 Frontage Road.
Why? Even
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 23:32:54 -0600, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
Rather than United Stated Highway 29 Frontage Road just U.S. 29
Frontage Road or maybe US 29 Frontage Road. Why. Because no will say
the formal out load.
Rather than Interstate 95 Frontage
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:52:31 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
Please keep them. They're not hurting anything.
Mapper fatigue. I don't really see how anything beyond tiger:reviewed=no
and tiger:tlid= tags are useful at this point, save to make tags more
difficult to sift through by human editors.
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:56:51 -0700, Alan Mintz wrote:
Yes. Last time, a couple of us (or maybe just me - I forget) argued that
it was OK to use common abbreviations for some well-known street types -
at least St, Ave, Blvd, Pl, etc. - but the opposition was significant,
and no change could be
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 21:05:10 -0600, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
To avoid this either:
1) A clear exception needs to be made 2) The official rule need to be
toned down.
I vote for
3) It's there for good reason. If you want abbreviations, tell your map
renderer to garble the data for you.
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 19:54:48 -0600, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
I would like to formally propose two things
1) An exception to the abbreviation rule for directional indicators
with the fully expanded name going into alt_name
2) New tags to record the presence of directional indicators
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 19:54:48 -0600, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
I would like to formally propose two things
1) An exception to the abbreviation rule for directional indicators
with the fully expanded name going into alt_name
2) New tags to record
At the risk of being accused of letting a good argument die...
At 2010-08-07 13:28, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:52:31 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
Please keep them. They're not hurting anything.
Mapper fatigue. I don't really see how anything beyond tiger:reviewed=no
and
On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 00:04:31 -0600, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
Since when does a frontage road get a Highway shield?
There's some special cases in Oregon where I 84 and US 30 are
multiplexed. US 30 takes the frontage in every city except Portland,
Gresham, Wood Village and Troutdale. Granted,
On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:09:10 -0400, Richard Welty wrote:
On 8/4/10 7:45 AM, Richard Weait wrote:
North Service Road and South Service Road. Romantic names, I know. Are
these similar to what you are calling frontage roads?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:42:52 -0700, Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
I think typically this isn't part of a name at all. Are people using it
in an address for mailing? how is it written in official records? how
would anyone do a search for a street? there are many corner cases so
there is no simple
At 2010-08-07 12:59, Paul Johnson wrote:
Meanwhile,
it has been observed on more than one occasion that the quality of the
data imported by TIGER is nearly or entirely worse than a blank map.
People can observe all they want - it doesn't make them right, and this
particular observation would
On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:17:43 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Presently numbered county roads in Florida (and New Jersey) are tagged
using parentheses, for example ref=(535) for County Road 535. The
reasons for this are essentially a historical accident. I'm proposing a
semi-automated change
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:37:33 -0600, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
Or do people here really think everything should be expand to the
fullest.
Abbreviations are bad because they can't be easily automatically
expanded. However, it's easy to abbreviate in a renderer when you know
what the full word is.
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 13:15 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
I vote for
3) It's there for good reason. If you want abbreviations, tell your map
renderer to garble the data for you. Pre-garbling the data complicates
other usage scenarios. Don't do it.
+1
Call me an abbreviation police if you
On 8/8/10 12:22 AM, Alan Millar wrote:
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 13:15 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
I vote for
3) It's there for good reason. If you want abbreviations, tell your map
renderer to garble the data for you. Pre-garbling the data complicates
other usage scenarios. Don't do it.
+1
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010, Richard Welty wrote:
On 8/8/10 12:22 AM, Alan Millar wrote:
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 13:15 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
I vote for
3) It's there for good reason. If you want abbreviations, tell your map
renderer to garble the data for you. Pre-garbling the data complicates
How about this proposal for US streets:
(1) Leave name unabbreviated
(2) Put whatever form you want of abbreviated name in name:en
Thoughts?
- Alan
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 22:35 -0600, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
For those voting +1 have you even read my original proposal on the reason I
want to abbreviate?
Yes. You gave a list of reasons it would be OK, and rules people would
have to follow to make it work. Some of the reasons I consider
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 13:00:48 -0400, Stefan Brandle wrote:
I teach computer science at a university about half way between
Indianapolis and Ft. Wayne. I would love to have someone show us how to
get involved mapping precise data locally and submitting it to various
online data sets, or working
On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 18:28:26 -0700, Alan Mintz wrote:
Lastly, it matches the
overwhelming majority of print usage and signage.
If print usage and signage were consistent even between cities in the
same state, I'd tend to agree. Given that what areas abbreviate which
words and what
I'm giving this another shot, this time I am completely staying out of the
abbreviation debate.
A full street address included more than just a Number and a Street, it
also includes a directional prefix and suffix. Vid the kid, gave an
excellent overview at
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 20:06:52 -0400, Phil! Gold wrote:
* Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org
[2010-07-21 00:19 -0700]:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:15:18 -0400, Phil! Gold wrote:
I what way does OpenCycleMap get this right? As far as I can tell,
it doesn't render road shields at all.
No, but it
On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 18:43:33 -0600, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
I am unlikely to try too push this though any time soon, so the
abbreviation police have won again, for now.
Why so condescending? I can't say this attitude is likely to change
consensus in your favor, especially considering that
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 18:43:33 -0600, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
I am unlikely to try too push this though any time soon, so the
abbreviation police have won again, for now.
Why so condescending? I can't say this attitude is likely to change
consensus in
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, Alan Millar wrote:
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 22:35 -0600, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
You certainly CAN have all the abbreviations you want. I'm just saying
not to put them in the name tag; put them in another tag. I
personally don't care if it is loc_name, alt_name, name_2,
69 matches
Mail list logo
