Re: [Talk-it] OsmAnd 2.0 disponibile
Si, oltre a ciò, quel pulsante è anche troppo grande. Ciao, Mirco Il 06/05/2015 11:18, beppebo...@libero.it [via GIS] ha scritto: alla fine installato e lo trovo ottimo, unica pecca per ora pulsante localizzazione troppo vicino ai pulsanti di ingrandimento, per il resto lo trovo molto migliorato anche nella velocità Messaggio originale Da: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=5843483i=0 Data: 05/05/2015 18.53 A: [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=5843483i=1 Ogg: Re: [Talk-it] OsmAnd 2.0 disponibile Una bella app, mio unico navigatore. Mirco -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/OsmAnd-2-0- disponibile-tp5842996p5843399.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-it mailing list [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=5843483i=2 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list [hidden email] /user/SendEmail.jtp?type=nodenode=5843483i=3 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/OsmAnd-2-0-disponibile-tp5842996p5843483.html To unsubscribe from OsmAnd 2.0 disponibile, click here http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=5842996code=bWlyY296b3J6b0BpbndpbmQuaXR8NTg0Mjk5NnwtODczMDE0MjQw. NAML http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewerid=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.namlbase=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespacebreadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml -- Mi piacciono Osmand.net e Openstreetmap.org mircozo...@pec.it -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/OsmAnd-2-0-disponibile-tp5842996p5843484.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] What extra permissions are needed to include CC-BY data in OSM
Am 05.05.2015 um 11:27 schrieb Andrew Harvey: ... My question was does CC-BY 4.0 have the same issue? Could CC-BY 4.0 data be included in OSM. ... My, very conservative, reading of CC-BY 4.0 would indicate that it has additional issues over just the attribution problem for databases. CC-BY 4.0 contains the following (4.b): if You include all or a substantial portion of the database contents in a database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights, then the database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights (but not its individual contents) is Adapted Material; and Adapted Material is essentially a derivative Work, or using ODbL terms a derivative database. The CC-BY terms would however seem to make it impossible to create an ODbL collective database from an OSM dataset including CC-BY material. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] What extra permissions are needed to include CC-BY data in OSM
Just as a clarification, versions of CC-by prior to 4.0 do not have this issue, however do not address the issue of database rights at all. All of the CC-BY licences -do- have the further issue, just as the ODbL, that they do not allow sub-licensing (which I consider a defect), however that aspect does not seem to be very high on the priority list of anybody. Simon Am 06.05.2015 um 11:25 schrieb Simon Poole: Am 05.05.2015 um 11:27 schrieb Andrew Harvey: ... My question was does CC-BY 4.0 have the same issue? Could CC-BY 4.0 data be included in OSM. ... My, very conservative, reading of CC-BY 4.0 would indicate that it has additional issues over just the attribution problem for databases. CC-BY 4.0 contains the following (4.b): if You include all or a substantial portion of the database contents in a database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights, then the database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights (but not its individual contents) is Adapted Material; and Adapted Material is essentially a derivative Work, or using ODbL terms a derivative database. The CC-BY terms would however seem to make it impossible to create an ODbL collective database from an OSM dataset including CC-BY material. Simon ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] May Meeting (Disabilty Kurb Project)
Is anyone planning to map the shops in the high street? I think it would be useful if they were added, but personally I'd prefer to come by bike and do some of the suburbs and the industrial estate. I'll also do some tracing in advance. -- Matthijs On 5 May 2015 at 11:19, Andy Robinson ajrli...@gmail.com wrote: I was planning to do a bit in the Blackwell / Burcot areas, assuming I get around to doing some tracing before Thursday. Cheers Andy From: Rob Nickerson [mailto:rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com] Sent: 02 May 2015 19:15 To: Mark Croft Cc: talk-gb-westmidlands Subject: Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] May Meeting (Disabilty Kurb Project) Sounds like an interesting project. Hopefully we'll see you in Bromsgrove on Thursday to discuss this in more detail. Speaking of which does anyone know what the plan is for Bromsgrove. Is there any priority areas that we should focus on or shall I just pick something and meet you in the pub afterwards? Rob On 1 May 2015 at 18:01, Mark Croft mark.croft@gmail.com wrote: Hi The group has been out to bewdley and did a test run of finding curbs. I was not able to join in cos of health problems felling worn out with weather n hayfever. I should really have a go on my own here around my town in redditch. got a stack of photos and a spreadsheet of gps points where there good curbs and so reasonable ones that either steep and hard work to push a manual wheelchair up and others with a reasonable size drop down to the path/road etc etc I need to get some clarification on all the different issues with curbs and come up with some form of coding and label system. first beta version of the map attached (not sure its openstreetmap) i want to know to make a seperate layer of points on top of openstreetmap? does this need to done on custom webpage and having a host etc? I not done any internet programming yet would like the challange but also very time limited too get some sort of beat/demo copy of at least a paper copy of the map of bewdley. Maybe we have a go around bromsgrove on thursday? Is taking photos with embedded gps position enough? I have a friend that can offer me some free website space? ( i am involved in another project called Disability Action Redditch and need to redo there website and i am hoping to put this Curb/Kurb project on there for now - so that should be up soon or at least a frontpage saying that DAR website going live in june/july 2015) mark croft redditch On 15 April 2015 at 19:42, Brian Prangle bpran...@gmail.com wrote: A quick reminder that we're due to meet on Thurs 7 May (Election Night!). Thise of us who were at the April meeting decided from our list on Bromsgrove ( mainly to support mark a new mapper). Pub is the Golden Cross ( A Wetherspoons ) which might be a challenge as it wasn't on the map when we decided Regards Brian ___ Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands ___ Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands ___ Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands ___ Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands
Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly Project All things delivery-related - an update
Are you aware of the the PostBox Finder https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.elbatrop.postboxeshl=enapp from Elbatrop? I had a quick play with it ages ago, adding some collection times to existing post boxes. Jerry On 5 May 2015 at 23:40, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote: Robert Whittaker has an excellent site http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postboxes/ monitoring OSM data on postboxes in the UK. Here you can see progress (even a league table of who's contributing). From the history graph you can see there's been an increase in activity since the project got going. Perhaps Robert might provide some data analysis about the effect of the project. Enter a postcode and you can find all the missing and incorrect postboxes nearby. Wow there are loads of postboxes still missing. Wouldn't it be great if there was a smartphone app that you could load missing points in to and it would tell you about them as you travel around. It would be like a guide to where to go mapping! Geocaching for postboxes anyone? Rob ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
[Talk-it] JOSM, Bing ed errore 403
ciao Lista! è un po' di tempo che JOSM non mi carica alcuni tasselli di Bing, mentre nessun problema per Mapbox ed altri TMS. Vengono scaricati solo lungo diagonali alternate dx-basso/alto-sx e l'errore ripostato è un http 403, pare quindi rifiutato dal server. Sono dietro ad un proxy e lavoro con la vesione 6502 (non mi dite di cambiarla perchè non posso). Qualcuno ha mai avuto un problema del genere? ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] mtb:scale
Da: scratera piz...@alice.it ..personalmente da ciclista mtb preferisco che venga mappato con la difficolta minore della totalità del sentiero...per 10m impraticabili su un paio di km di sentiero me la carico in spalla..ma per lo meno il resto me lo son fatto e mi son divertito... +1 Io di solito mappo così. Pietro ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it-trentino] Mappiamo per il Nepal?
On 06/05/15 10:08, Mattia Martinello wrote: C'è per caso del materiale sull'evento? Grazie, ciao Mattia. Ciao, puoi trovare i link a del materiale che hanno fornito Maurizio e Luca sul mio profilo OSM [1]. Non so se qualcuno abbia registrato un video e dubito possa essere utile, visto che purtroppo il proiettore proiettava un'immagine molto piccola. Resto disponibile per chi avesse dei dubbi a incontri ufficiosi per approfondimenti. [1]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/matteo-quatrida -- Matteo Quatrida /“If a cluttered desk is a sign of a cluttered mind, of what, then, is an empty desk a sign?” Albert Einstein/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Talk-it-trentino mailing list Talk-it-trentino@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it-trentino
Re: [Talk-it] JOSM, Bing ed errore 403
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il 06/05/2015 10:38, Giovanni Cascafico ha scritto: ciao Lista! è un po' di tempo che JOSM non mi carica alcuni tasselli di Bing, mentre nessun problema per Mapbox ed altri TMS. Vengono scaricati solo lungo diagonali alternate dx-basso/alto-sx e l'errore ripostato è un http 403, pare quindi rifiutato dal server. Sono dietro ad un proxy e lavoro con la vesione 6502 (non mi dite di cambiarla perchè non posso). Qualcuno ha mai avuto un problema del genere? ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it Io ho questa path, controlla se corrisponde, altrimenti probabile, è il proxy che limita. bing[22]:http://www.bing.com/maps/ - -- Simone Girardelli _|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_ |_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_| -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVSdiaAAoJEMTPIIVov0ZtC4sIANBizNbZRNF6iZc6cakMqN7C enNWrstO52pgvf0yrfsF+rKMkJuxYXyip8OrIjV5lt4zcqags6LOXV07qb8qO4CF kowp4bO4emf/zzc3ViE94JcskawjhcTUqzLQLbIJrslUltpZ6ZN/LAxlQEIGFD5g YXvJITjXGWYGgbQeUbqWm4oNeHPQqY+QcZ65ABchjQ0dZDRh1mTgMSVz5kSDQUIU qKfrr+nay6Gmm2YtbjaB0tbj50y/FbrNd/XEE64le7T+1m74FxcirZtsDkY/FJda f/pLPb+eUSoVYyzeWCHprukuw/gkE2SoBH9JGtz/kKMCHuM5bhz0xmQ2/zFDATY= =b5vU -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap newbie - help/guidance to convert OSM XML data to .gpx
There is an alternative to Google StreetView. It's called Mapillary http://www.mapillary.com/map and OSM has the permission to use it. The development for a JOSM integration is starting in June. Cheers, Christian aka Hedaja 2015-05-06 10:31 GMT+02:00 Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org: On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Ángel de Vicente angel.vicente.garr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, a complete newbie to Openstreetmap here, so bear with me... Briefly, what I'm, trying to achieve is the following: I have a .gpx file from a bike ride, and I want to use the gps data to get images from those locations from Google Street View. But, GPS not being that accurate, I first want to massage the .gpx file and obtain a .gpx file where the coordinates have been matched to the closest road. JOSM can convert back and forth between the two formats. Please be aware that Google Street View is widely regarded to be an unsuitable data source, so please do not edit based on Street View. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Question Overpass Turbo
Merci pour l'explication et vos retours ! Les 3 relations ont été créées entre 13h00 et 13h20 alors que les noeuds ont été édités avant 12h30, c'est ça. Ca y est, la L10 est retournée par Overpass maintenant c'est réglé : http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/9cn Le 04/05/2015, sly (sylvain letuffe)lis...@letuffe.org a écrit : Le lundi 4 mai 2015 20:55:22, Augustin Doury a écrit : A voir d'ici quelques jours, si quelqu'un a une explication, top. Bonne soirée Pour information, l'explication en rapide ici (en anglais): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_API/status et en détail là : (en anglais): https://github.com/drolbr/Overpass-API/issues/210 En rapide, aucune des modifications survenues entre 2015-04-30 12:43 et 2015-04-30 13:36 UTC ne sont présentes dans la base Overpass de http://overpass-api.de Un nouveau serveur est prévu et donc l'admin attend le remplacement de l'actuel par le nouveau, ce qui corrigera le problème. L'instance sur http://api.openstreetmap.fr/oapi/ a été corrigée par mes soins la nuit dernière et devrait contenir ce que l'autre n'a pas. -- sly (sylvain letuffe) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Sletuffe ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [Talk-it-trentino] Mappiamo per il Nepal?
On 06/05/15 10:46, Matteo Quatrida wrote: puoi trovare i link a del materiale che hanno fornito Maurizio e Luca sul mio profilo OSM [1]. Non so se qualcuno abbia registrato un video e dubito possa essere utile, visto che purtroppo il proiettore proiettava un'immagine molto piccola. Resto disponibile per chi avesse dei dubbi a incontri ufficiosi per approfondimenti. Grazie mille! Ciao, Mattia. ___ Talk-it-trentino mailing list Talk-it-trentino@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it-trentino
Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap newbie - help/guidance to convert OSM XML data to .gpx
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Ángel de Vicente angel.vicente.garr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, a complete newbie to Openstreetmap here, so bear with me... Briefly, what I'm, trying to achieve is the following: I have a .gpx file from a bike ride, and I want to use the gps data to get images from those locations from Google Street View. But, GPS not being that accurate, I first want to massage the .gpx file and obtain a .gpx file where the coordinates have been matched to the closest road. JOSM can convert back and forth between the two formats. Please be aware that Google Street View is widely regarded to be an unsuitable data source, so please do not edit based on Street View. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap newbie - help/guidance to convert OSM XML data to .gpx
Hi all, a complete newbie to Openstreetmap here, so bear with me... Briefly, what I'm, trying to achieve is the following: I have a .gpx file from a bike ride, and I want to use the gps data to get images from those locations from Google Street View. But, GPS not being that accurate, I first want to massage the .gpx file and obtain a .gpx file where the coordinates have been matched to the closest road. By using https://mapmatching.3scale.net/ I manage to get a good match to the closest road, but the format for the output file I get is not .gpx anymore. To give some details, the .gpx file I get comes from the Endomondo application, and it looks like: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? [...] trkseg trkpt lat=28.466029 lon=-16.269666 time2014-10-03T07:08:14Z/time /trkpt After using the mapmatching website I get a xml file, which looks like: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 standalone=yes?resultdiaryentriesentryroutelink src=278449946 id=101549311 dst=1172664894/link src=\ 1172664894 id=158914755 dst=278449944/ [...] I already have a script that, when given a .gpx file with the format above will collect the images from Google Street View, with the correct compass bearings, etc., so I would like to be able to convert the .xml file with the OpenStreetMap references back to a .gpx format. Is this possible somehow? Any help/guidance appreciated. Thanks, Ángel de Vicente ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-it] Comune di milano usa mappa osm per il routing
Ciao Maxx, il routing mi sembra abbastanza veloce. Se incappi in errori non dovuti ai dati o a problemi specifici nella navigazione ti prego di segnalarlo in modo dettagliato. Io riscontro problemi di lentezza / blocco con chrome su linux, ma non sono limitati al portale della mobilità di Milano. I dati per il routing sono OSM (con aggiunta dei numeri civici del SIT comunale), i tile sono prodotti ad hoc, il motore di routing è basato su un OTP modificato. I dati non sono utilizzati online ma scaricati periodicamente (da noi di AMAT), quindi le modifiche fatte su OSM non sono immediatamente visibili. Il fatto che il comune di Milano abbia deciso di utilizzare OSM per il portale e pur con tutti i limiti del caso si occupi dell'aggiornamento di OSM mi sembra parecchio positivo. Se possiamo fare qualcosa per migliorare fatecelo sapere! Sig Il giorno 5 maggio 2015 22:20, emmexx emm...@tiscalinet.it ha scritto: Vista la lentezza del sito non so se sia positivo... :-( http://www.muoversi.milano.it/ ciao maxx ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-cz] Restrukturalizace Wiki
Ahoj, spatne vidim to, ze nektere stranky mohou byt uz historicky nalinkovane treba z mailing listu a ted se jen tak presunou a zmizi. Napr. WikiProject Czech Republic/freemap http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Czech_Republic/freemap Take pochybuji, ze az to nekdo zacne prejmenovat, tak, ze se bude predelavat i s internima linkama mezi strankama na wiki. Ale uvidime. Dalibor From: Jan Breuer [mailto:jan.bre...@jaybee.cz] Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2015 2:51 PM To: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Subject: Re: [Talk-cz] Restrukturalizace Wiki Ahoj, co je špatně na prefixu Cs: pro stránky, které jsou v češtině a ještě ho nemají? Honza Dne 5. května 2015 12:29 Dalibor Jelínek dali...@dalibor.cz mailto:dali...@dalibor.cz napsal(a): Ahoj, nechcete nekdo prispet do debaty tady? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category_talk:Czech_Documentation A zastat se kategorie, ktera sdruzuje vsechny stranky v ceskem jazyce? Prilis aktivni uzvatel se rozhodl, ze je tahle kategorie pro nas zbytecna a navic ma podle vsehov planu prejmenovavat ceske stranky, ktere se nejmenuji podle tvaru Cs:*. Predem dekuji, Dalibor ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org mailto:Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
Re: [Talk-de] Offline-Software - Anzeige eines Ortes mit Längen- Breitengrad
Hallo Maria, ich bin mir nicht sicher ob MapSource (älter, einfacher) (bzw. BaseCamp - neuer, größer) von Garmin (freie Software) dein Problem löst. Man kann auf jeden Fall bei beiden OSM Karten installieren und dann offline benutzen. Beim Bewegen des Mauszeigers auf der Karte werden einem immer die Koordinaten angezeigt, so dass man schnell auf jedem gewünschten Punkt ist. Gruß Bernhard Hallo, ich suche eine Software für Windows (möglichst einfach und simple), die ohne Internetzugang in Offline-OSM-Karten eine manuell eingegebene GPS-Position anzeigt. Irgendwie habe ich noch nicht das richtige dazu gefunden. -- Gruß Mario ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-it] R: OsmAnd 2.0 disponibile
Io ho Osmand+ con i dati su SD, e si rifiuta di fare l'aggiornamento (mi dice proprio impossibile scrivere su SD). Eppure l'aggiornamento dei dati cartografici funziona bene (sono sotto /storage/extsdcard/Android/data/net.osmand.plus/). Sig 2015-05-05 16:34 GMT+02:00 Marco Ciampa ciam...@libero.it: On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 04:28:05PM +0200, Leonardo wrote: Sembra ci sia un piccolo problema per i possessori della Osmand Plus: OsmAnd+ upgrade issue: due to lots of issues while upgrading OsmAnd+ (paid version) to 2.0, we organized poll (see below) in order to find and fix the issue, your feedback is important to us, in order to find the problem quicker. Right now we suspect paid apps which were moved to sdcard ( http://www.pocketables.com/2014/06/fix-couldnt-install-usb-storage-sd-card.html ). Avevi spostato l'applicazione sulla scheda SD? Impossibile: ho un Samsung Galaxy Nexus (Goggle phone): non ha alcuna SD... -- Marco Ciampa I know a joke about UDP, but you might not get it. ++ | GNU/Linux User #78271 | | FSFE fellow #364 | ++ ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] OsmAnd 2.0 disponibile
alla fine installato e lo trovo ottimo, unica pecca per ora pulsante localizzazione troppo vicino ai pulsanti di ingrandimento, per il resto lo trovo molto migliorato anche nella velocità Messaggio originale Da: mircozo...@inwind.it Data: 05/05/2015 18.53 A: talk-it@openstreetmap.org Ogg: Re: [Talk-it] OsmAnd 2.0 disponibile Una bella app, mio unico navigatore. Mirco -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/OsmAnd-2-0- disponibile-tp5842996p5843399.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [OSM-talk-be] route = foot
Ik heb het desbetreffende stukje toen gemaakt. En had dit voorbeeld van een andere route afgekeken. Het is trouwens zo dat als je die wandelroute bewandeld dat je zoiezo die weg opgestuurd wordt, het is namelijk deel van een bewegwijzerde GR route en gans het plein meenemen geeft een foutief beeld van de wandelweg na het renderen. mvg, Bart Op 5 mei 2015 18:20 schreef Ruben Maes ru...@janmaes.com: Sorry to bring up this old thread, I was bored so I skimmed a bit through old unopened mails from the mailing list and I thought I should mention this: There's also this proposal for 'virtual highways': https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/virtual_highway The original proposal uses highway=virtual, I suggested using highway:virtual=pedestrian/... instead so you don't have to add all access restrictions by hand. I am not sure whether it is a good idea or not, but the proposal is there on the wiki. Groeten Ruben On 20 Jan 2015 23:29, Gilbert Hersschens gherssch...@gmail.com wrote: Bedankt. Weer iets bijgeleerd. 2015-01-20 22:14 GMT+01:00 Jo winfi...@gmail.com: route=foot lijkt mij ook een redelijk elegante oplossing om zowel een continue reeks ways te hebben in de relatie, zonder de rendering te beïnvloeden. Op 20 januari 2015 22:12 schreef Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com: Dit zijn stukjes over pleinen waar enkele routes over gaan, je kan moeilijk het hele plein toevoegen omdat je dan de exacte route verliest, en aangezien er niets verschillend in realiteit is kan je er ook niet echt een highway=footway of pedestrian aan geven. Vandaar dus route=foot/bicycle, en die kun je nog wel op enkele andere plekken vinden in het land. Of dat dit nu correct is of niet, het is toch duidelijk wat de bedoeling is, dus niets mis mee wat mij betreft. Ben On Tuesday 20 January 2015 21:13:47 Gilbert Hersschens wrote: Er loopt een wandel route dwars over de markt van Geel. Die markt is een voetgangerszone getagd als highway = pedestrian + area = yes. Omdat die highway dus geen way maar een area is heeft de mapper er gewoon een lijn door getrokken om de 2 stukken weg dwars over de markt te verbinden (om de route niet te breken) en dat stukje weg getagd met route = foot. Nu is route normalerwijze een relatie type en geen highway tag. Ik vraag me dus af of dit de correcte tag is voor een virtuele weg over een plein. Het is in elk geval een creatieve oplossing, maar misschien is er een andere, meer correcte manier ? zie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148011489 Gilbert ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Rocade de Rennes. La vitesse maximale abaissée de 20 km/h pendant un an
Bonjour, J'ai relayé sur la liste bretonne. Romain Le 6 mai 2015 08:50, Francescu GAROBY f.gar...@gmail.com a écrit : Bonjour aux cartographieurs rennais (et aux autres aussi, bien sûr), Pour info, Ouest-France annonce que les limitations de vitesse sur le périphérique de Rennes vont changer, en septembre : http://www.ouest-france.fr/rocade-de-rennes-la-vitesse-maximale-abaissee-de-20-km/h-pendant-un-3378090 Francescu ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
[OSM-talk-be] Mapper of the month : eMerzh
Hello OSM Belgium, Proud to present you our new mapper of the month: eMerzh! NL: http://osm.be/nl/content/mappers-van-de-maand-mei-brice-emerzh FR: http://osm.be/fr/content/contributeur-du-mois-de-mai-brice-emerzh Thanks a lot to the translation team. If you have some time, feel free to join us! Best greetings, Marc ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
[Talk-it] [Off topic] Messaggi marcati come spam
Ciao a tutti, Da qualche tempo i messaggi della lista che provengono da mittenti @ libero.it vengono classificati come spam da Gmail. Premesso che il problema è di Gmail e non di talk-it, volevo sapere se succede anche a voi ed eventualmente come avete risolto. Ciao /niubii/ ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
[Talk-de] Wochennotiz Nr. 250 28.4.–4.5.2015
Hallo, die Wochennotiz Nr. 250 mit allen wichtigen Neuigkeiten aus der OpenStreetMap Welt ist da: http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2015/05/wochennotiz-nr-250/ Viel Spaß beim Lesen! ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-it] [Off topic] Messaggi marcati come spam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il 06/05/2015 12:42, Francesco Pelullo ha scritto: Ciao a tutti, Da qualche tempo i messaggi della lista che provengono da mittenti @ libero.it vengono classificati come spam da Gmail. Premesso che il problema è di Gmail e non di talk-it, volevo sapere se succede anche a voi ed eventualmente come avete risolto. Ciao /niubii/ ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it Confermo! - -- Simone Girardelli _|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_ |_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_| -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVSfGAAAoJEMTPIIVov0Zt6xUIAIuZHPSx2W4rcOqBmjyXy1E7 4lxFb0reOOEZigMG5lAX3dIZIpeHfdbW988tVe8QRBXBUiap6IJg9HZ/9oH+SZ2L 9QkgMwDXkRzT316TK9YIU9q7Zx51YOZk9YkRgnkaNpDDkwCnnK5kec7Y0qptpyoe 7UXUZnmy/mscZadquKQ1K5uIEDZ8qWcpOaZK+iK04UrtbdR0XK0Oa3//i8rTyBMg lT6JNevExnQNQG2G1v4H3P14asgvTL+ztYiGS0qQWUZiGPHlIlvaT6aPFlLiClaJ nCZxKtDgahMkDF0CjCTPnDzDpby5jpfEno3lsi4zRBBgyIbtcYEDXV6e0HBGZ0U= =dC99 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] R: OsmAnd 2.0 disponibile
Il 06/05/2015 10:28, Luca Sigfrido Percich ha scritto: Io ho Osmand+ con i dati su SD, e si rifiuta di fare l'aggiornamento (mi dice proprio impossibile scrivere su SD). Eppure l'aggiornamento dei dati cartografici funziona bene (sono sotto /storage/extsdcard/Android/data/net.osmand.plus/). Sig 2015-05-05 16:34 GMT+02:00 Marco Ciampa ciam...@libero.it mailto:ciam...@libero.it: On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 04:28:05PM +0200, Leonardo wrote: Sembra ci sia un piccolo problema per i possessori della Osmand Plus: OsmAnd+ upgrade issue: due to lots of issues while upgrading OsmAnd+ (paid version) to 2.0, we organized poll (see below) in order to find and fix the issue, your feedback is important to us, in order to find the problem quicker. Right now we suspect paid apps which were moved to sdcard (http://www.pocketables.com/2014/06/fix-couldnt-install-usb-storage-sd-card.html). Avevi spostato l'applicazione sulla scheda SD? Impossibile: ho un Samsung Galaxy Nexus (Goggle phone): non ha alcuna SD... -- Marco Ciampa I know a joke about UDP, but you might not get it. ++ | GNU/Linux User #78271 | | FSFE fellow #364 | ++ ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org mailto:Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it Io uso cyanogenmod 7 (android gingerbred), su galaxy mini. Non si installa nemmeno la 2.x!! Infatti uso ancora la 1.8.3, perchè anche la 1.9 mi dava problemi (si installava ma crashava di continuo). Il problema non è osmand, ma il telefono ormai poco performante per tale applicazione. Emanuele ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] What extra permissions are needed to include CC-BY data in OSM
Simon Poole simon@... writes: CC-BY 4.0 contains the following (4.b): if You include all or a substantial portion of the database contents in a database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights, then the database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights (but not its individual contents) is Adapted Material; and Adapted Material is essentially a derivative Work, or using ODbL terms a derivative database. The CC-BY terms would however seem to make it impossible to create an ODbL collective database from an OSM dataset including CC-BY material. Hi, I do not quite understand what I'd have if I import OSM data into one table and CC-BY 4.0 data into another table in the database. If the whole database is then Adapted Material and under CC-BY but not its individual contents, does it mean that I can truncate OSM tables and deliver the database as such? Or if I import CC-BY and OSM data into the same table can I do delete from table where source='OSM' before delivering that as a CC-BY 4.0 database? -Jukka Rahkonen- ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [Talk-it] [Off topic] Messaggi marcati come spam
Pure io confermo. Ciao! Carlo ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Comune di milano usa mappa osm per il routing
Ciao Sig, solo una info ... con aggiunta dei numeri civici del SIT comunale è da intendere che integrate al vostro interno i dati di civici di OSM + quelli della città? Oppure questi ultimi sono open data e se si mi potresti indicare dove scaricarli? Grazie e complimenti per il lavoro fatto Cesare Cesare Gerbino http://cesaregerbino.wordpress.com/ http://www.facebook.com/cesare.gerbino http://www.facebook.com/pages/Cesare-Gerbino-GIS-Blog/246234455498174?ref=hl https://twitter.com/CesareGerbino http://www.linkedin.com/pub/cesare-gerbino/56/494/77b Questo è un account di posta personale di Cesare Gerbino: tutte le opinioni espresse sono personali e non riflettono necessariamente quelle del mio datore di lavoro This is Cesare Gerbino mail account. Text is written by Cesare Gerbino: the views expressed are mine and not necessarily those of my employer. . Il giorno 6 maggio 2015 12:05, Luca Sigfrido Percich luca.perc...@gmail.com ha scritto: Ciao Maxx, il routing mi sembra abbastanza veloce. Se incappi in errori non dovuti ai dati o a problemi specifici nella navigazione ti prego di segnalarlo in modo dettagliato. Io riscontro problemi di lentezza / blocco con chrome su linux, ma non sono limitati al portale della mobilità di Milano. I dati per il routing sono OSM (con aggiunta dei numeri civici del SIT comunale), i tile sono prodotti ad hoc, il motore di routing è basato su un OTP modificato. I dati non sono utilizzati online ma scaricati periodicamente (da noi di AMAT), quindi le modifiche fatte su OSM non sono immediatamente visibili. Il fatto che il comune di Milano abbia deciso di utilizzare OSM per il portale e pur con tutti i limiti del caso si occupi dell'aggiornamento di OSM mi sembra parecchio positivo. Se possiamo fare qualcosa per migliorare fatecelo sapere! Sig Il giorno 5 maggio 2015 22:20, emmexx emm...@tiscalinet.it ha scritto: Vista la lentezza del sito non so se sia positivo... :-( http://www.muoversi.milano.it/ ciao maxx ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-br] Uso Correto da Place
Os desenvolvedores do Mkgmap identificaram o problema e o estão corrigindo na versão 3564 dele conforme mensagem naquela lista a seguir: I've now looked at the code in POIGeneratorHook. Attached is a first attempt to solve the problem, the compiled binary based on trunk version r3564 is here: http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/264/mkgmap.jar It implements the following: When POIGeneratorHook creates a POI for a type=boundary relation with boundary=administrative it searches for a role=admin_centre member in that relation. If one is found, the generated POI will use the coordinates of this member. Gerd Conforme citei anteriormente, na minha opinião não se justifica termos dois POIs de cidade com o mesmo nome. Um criado pela relação devido a tag place nela e outro pelo admin_centre existente nessa relação e que tem o place no ponto zero da cidade. De qualquer forma esse problema foi solucionado a nivel renderizador. []s Marcio -Mensagem Original- From: Nelson A. de Oliveira Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 8:45 AM To: OpenStreetMap no Brasil Subject: Re: [Talk-br] Uso Correto da Place O Marcio e o Anor estão na lista do mkgmap e já devem ter visto, mas para os outros: = I am not sure if the OSM data is okay, but I think we probably have more sure cases. Did anybody try to solve that already? The OSM data is okay, it is defined this way in the wiki. = Essa forma atual de representar os dados com place no nó e relação não está errada, portanto (então não precisa mexer nelas). O que pode ser feito no OSM é verificar se existe mais relações duplicadas, como a que o Blademir achou. ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Re: [Talk-it] [Off topic] Messaggi marcati come spam
2015-05-06 15:39 GMT+02:00 Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com: Confermo. E non è la prima volta che il dominio libero.it finisce su una blacklist. E' un problema di libero. Rimedio: cambiare provider. :-) Anche io confermo il problema spam (anche se non avevo collegato a libero). Federico ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap newbie - help/guidance to convert OSM XML data to .gpx
On 06/05/2015 14:27, Ángel de Vicente wrote: sorry, let's see if I can explain myself better. The attachment in my previous mail is what I got from the page https://mapmatching.3scale.net/ They seem to have their own forum (https://mapmatching.3scale.net/forum). You might do better to ask on there. -- Steve --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-it] [Off topic] Messaggi marcati come spam
confermo anch'io. Anche il server di posta dove lavoro rifiuta spesso i messaggi di libero.it Stefano Il giorno 6 maggio 2015 15:43, Federico Cortese cortese...@gmail.com ha scritto: 2015-05-06 15:39 GMT+02:00 Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com: Confermo. E non è la prima volta che il dominio libero.it finisce su una blacklist. E' un problema di libero. Rimedio: cambiare provider. :-) Anche io confermo il problema spam (anche se non avevo collegato a libero). Federico ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Aiutino per Wiki Loves Monuments Italia
Con estremo piacere vedo che è stato sostituito il link a Google Maps con la mappa OSM perfettamente funzionante. Grazie. Federico ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Aiutino per Wiki Loves Monuments Italia
Ciao. L'utente Bultro ha da poco modificato il template e adesso è stato tolto GoogleMaps (che non funzionava più, nemmeno su en.wikipedia) e inserito OSM. Per quanto riguarda la compilazione automatica delle tabelle (almeno per quanto riguarda le coordinate) ho chiesto dei pareri sulla possibilità di usare Wikidata. Al momento non sembra ancora possibile, ma se qui c'è qualcuno che sa orientarsi con Wikidata è il benvenuto se vuole provare a modificare il template usato per compilare le tabelle. Intanto grazie per il contributo :-) Dario Il giorno 6 maggio 2015 14:48, Federico Cortese cortese...@gmail.com ha scritto: 2015-05-06 0:42 GMT+02:00 Dario Crespi dario.cre...@gmail.com: Scrivo per chiedere se c'è qualcuno che ha voglia di dare una mano con la redazione delle liste di monumenti fotografabili per l'edizione 2015 di Wiki Loves Monuments Italia. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it Ciao Dario e grazie per la segnalazione. Darò volentieri una mano per quel che riguarda Lecce e zone limitrofe, visto che mancano le coordinate per tutti i siti. Anche se in realtà tutti i siti di Lecce hanno già le coordinate nelle relative pagine di Wikipedia, anche perchè sono collegate alle geometrie di OSM. Le coordinate non possono essere inserite automaticamente in quella tabella? Inoltre il link nel riquadro in alto a destra per visualizzare tutti i luoghi della tabella sulla mappa non funziona per Google Maps mentre è ok per Bing (anche se dalla pagina della Puglia mi mandava in Calabria, ma ho già corretto il link). Ciao Federico ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Aiutino per Wiki Loves Monuments Italia
2015-05-06 0:42 GMT+02:00 Dario Crespi dario.cre...@gmail.com: Scrivo per chiedere se c'è qualcuno che ha voglia di dare una mano con la redazione delle liste di monumenti fotografabili per l'edizione 2015 di Wiki Loves Monuments Italia. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it Ciao Dario e grazie per la segnalazione. Darò volentieri una mano per quel che riguarda Lecce e zone limitrofe, visto che mancano le coordinate per tutti i siti. Anche se in realtà tutti i siti di Lecce hanno già le coordinate nelle relative pagine di Wikipedia, anche perchè sono collegate alle geometrie di OSM. Le coordinate non possono essere inserite automaticamente in quella tabella? Inoltre il link nel riquadro in alto a destra per visualizzare tutti i luoghi della tabella sulla mappa non funziona per Google Maps mentre è ok per Bing (anche se dalla pagina della Puglia mi mandava in Calabria, ma ho già corretto il link). Ciao Federico ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap newbie - help/guidance to convert OSM XML data to .gpx
OK, I seem to have misunderstood the situation, then. You're trying to convert OSM data to GPX, and vice versa, no? If that's the case, right click on the layer and select Convert to... On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Ángel de Vicente angel.vicente.garr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Paul, thanks. I tried JOSM, but probably because I have no idea what I'm doing, I cannot open the .xml generated file. The message that I get is No data found in file 'output.xml'. I attach the file that I'm trying to load, in case I'm doing something obviouosly wrong. Thanks, On 6 May 2015 at 09:31, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Ángel de Vicente angel.vicente.garr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, a complete newbie to Openstreetmap here, so bear with me... Briefly, what I'm, trying to achieve is the following: I have a .gpx file from a bike ride, and I want to use the gps data to get images from those locations from Google Street View. But, GPS not being that accurate, I first want to massage the .gpx file and obtain a .gpx file where the coordinates have been matched to the closest road. JOSM can convert back and forth between the two formats. Please be aware that Google Street View is widely regarded to be an unsuitable data source, so please do not edit based on Street View. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] contact: tags
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 06:20:42PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2015-05-05 17:21 GMT+02:00 Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com: the verbosity may be unneeded for very simple things like phone but is that true for everything covered by contact* ? key:fax? key:twitter? key:vhf? have you seen taginfo? 906 vhf 182 vhf_channel 73 waterway:vhf_channel 36 lock:VHF_channel 32 VHF 16 contact:vhf imho key:vhf is pretty poor choice of a tag name and the usage count is overall not so large. http://taginfo.osm.org/search?q=vhf twitter and fax are less clear, but the contact:-form is always less in use. still sceptical. If someone wants to write an app displaying contact info he could blindly output contact:.* or put together a list of many dozens of tags like phone,fax,email,facebook,vk,xing and still won't be able to retrieve contact of a site that has more exotic means of communication like smoke signals or drums. Even collecting all the existing tags looks like a huge pain in the b..t if they are not documented or prefixed by contact:. The usage of the four most popular contact: entries reaches almost 200,000 which is not too bad. Also I am not quite sure how many of those entries are actually valid, taginfo is not a great help here: http://taginfo.osm.org/keys/phone#values http://taginfo.osm.org/keys/contact:phone#values Btw anyone knows what phone=3631 is ? Richard ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-it] [Off topic] Messaggi marcati come spam
Confermo. E non è la prima volta che il dominio libero.it finisce su una blacklist. E' un problema di libero. Rimedio: cambiare provider. :-) 2015-05-06 13:49 GMT+02:00 Elena ``of Valhalla'' elena.valha...@gmail.com: On 2015-05-06 at 12:42:54 +0200, Francesco Pelullo wrote: Da qualche tempo i messaggi della lista che provengono da mittenti @ libero.it vengono classificati come spam da Gmail. mi viene da sospettare che sia dovuto ai recenti invii di spam a nome di account libero.it Premesso che il problema è di Gmail e non di talk-it, volevo sapere se succede anche a voi ed eventualmente come avete risolto. segnare manualmente come non spam i messaggi delle liste un po' aiuta, anche se l'effetto non è di lunga durata. Quando capita che l'interfaccia chieda se inviare i messaggi segnati come non-spam al loro team di solito lo faccio (ovviamente se sono solo messaggi di liste pubbliche), sperando che anche questo aiuti. -- Elena ``of Valhalla'' ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
[OSM-talk] Fwd: OpenStreetMap newbie - help/guidance to convert OSM XML data to .gpx
-- Forwarded message -- From: Ángel de Vicente angel.vicente.garr...@gmail.com Date: 6 May 2015 at 14:49 Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap newbie - help/guidance to convert OSM XML data to .gpx To: Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com Hi, I did ask at the forum, but the reply was that converting the output to .gpx format is something that they do not support yet... Thanks Ángel On 6 May 2015 at 14:45, Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/05/2015 14:27, Ángel de Vicente wrote: sorry, let's see if I can explain myself better. The attachment in my previous mail is what I got from the page https://mapmatching.3scale.net/ They seem to have their own forum (https://mapmatching.3scale.net/forum). You might do better to ask on there. -- Steve --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap newbie - help/guidance to convert OSM XML data to .gpx
They don't seem to have any DOCTYPE at all. On 6 May 2015 at 14:36, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote: I'm curious what the DOCTYPE is on the XML being put out, that might provide some clues. On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Ángel de Vicente angel.vicente.garr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Paul, sorry, let's see if I can explain myself better. The attachment in my previous mail is what I got from the page https://mapmatching.3scale.net/ That file contains good data but in a format that I don't know how to deal with. I would like only to convert that .xml file to a .gpx file with latitude and longitude coordinates. But when I try to open with JOSM that file (output.xml), it complains that no data was found (and thus I don't see any Convert option when I right click the output.xml layer. I hope now it is a bitt more clear. Thanks a lot Angel de Vicente https://mapmatching.3scale.net/ On 6 May 2015 at 14:21, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote: OK, I seem to have misunderstood the situation, then. You're trying to convert OSM data to GPX, and vice versa, no? If that's the case, right click on the layer and select Convert to... On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Ángel de Vicente angel.vicente.garr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Paul, thanks. I tried JOSM, but probably because I have no idea what I'm doing, I cannot open the .xml generated file. The message that I get is No data found in file 'output.xml'. I attach the file that I'm trying to load, in case I'm doing something obviouosly wrong. Thanks, On 6 May 2015 at 09:31, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Ángel de Vicente angel.vicente.garr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, a complete newbie to Openstreetmap here, so bear with me... Briefly, what I'm, trying to achieve is the following: I have a .gpx file from a bike ride, and I want to use the gps data to get images from those locations from Google Street View. But, GPS not being that accurate, I first want to massage the .gpx file and obtain a .gpx file where the coordinates have been matched to the closest road. JOSM can convert back and forth between the two formats. Please be aware that Google Street View is widely regarded to be an unsuitable data source, so please do not edit based on Street View. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-it] [Off topic] Messaggi marcati come spam
Libero ha cambiato il sistemista con una società esterna e a quanto pare i risultati non sono esaltanti. Confermo il problema di ricezione e a quanto pare anche di invio. From: Stefano Salvador Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 4:01 PM To: openstreetmap list - italiano Subject: Re: [Talk-it] [Off topic] Messaggi marcati come spam confermo anch'io. Anche il server di posta dove lavoro rifiuta spesso i messaggi di libero.it Stefano Il giorno 6 maggio 2015 15:43, Federico Cortese cortese...@gmail.com ha scritto: 2015-05-06 15:39 GMT+02:00 Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com: Confermo. E non è la prima volta che il dominio libero.it finisce su una blacklist. E' un problema di libero. Rimedio: cambiare provider. :-) Anche io confermo il problema spam (anche se non avevo collegato a libero). Federico ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap newbie - help/guidance to convert OSM XML data to .gpx
You might try using a conversion tool like GDAL or OGR2OGR? QGIS has them too. Andrew El miércoles, 6 de mayo de 2015, Ángel de Vicente angel.vicente.garr...@gmail.com escribió: They don't seem to have any DOCTYPE at all. On 6 May 2015 at 14:36, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ba...@ursamundi.org'); wrote: I'm curious what the DOCTYPE is on the XML being put out, that might provide some clues. On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Ángel de Vicente angel.vicente.garr...@gmail.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','angel.vicente.garr...@gmail.com'); wrote: Hi Paul, sorry, let's see if I can explain myself better. The attachment in my previous mail is what I got from the page https://mapmatching.3scale.net/ That file contains good data but in a format that I don't know how to deal with. I would like only to convert that .xml file to a .gpx file with latitude and longitude coordinates. But when I try to open with JOSM that file (output.xml), it complains that no data was found (and thus I don't see any Convert option when I right click the output.xml layer. I hope now it is a bitt more clear. Thanks a lot Angel de Vicente https://mapmatching.3scale.net/ On 6 May 2015 at 14:21, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ba...@ursamundi.org'); wrote: OK, I seem to have misunderstood the situation, then. You're trying to convert OSM data to GPX, and vice versa, no? If that's the case, right click on the layer and select Convert to... On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Ángel de Vicente angel.vicente.garr...@gmail.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','angel.vicente.garr...@gmail.com'); wrote: Hi Paul, thanks. I tried JOSM, but probably because I have no idea what I'm doing, I cannot open the .xml generated file. The message that I get is No data found in file 'output.xml'. I attach the file that I'm trying to load, in case I'm doing something obviouosly wrong. Thanks, On 6 May 2015 at 09:31, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ba...@ursamundi.org'); wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Ángel de Vicente angel.vicente.garr...@gmail.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','angel.vicente.garr...@gmail.com'); wrote: Hi all, a complete newbie to Openstreetmap here, so bear with me... Briefly, what I'm, trying to achieve is the following: I have a .gpx file from a bike ride, and I want to use the gps data to get images from those locations from Google Street View. But, GPS not being that accurate, I first want to massage the .gpx file and obtain a .gpx file where the coordinates have been matched to the closest road. JOSM can convert back and forth between the two formats. Please be aware that Google Street View is widely regarded to be an unsuitable data source, so please do not edit based on Street View. -- 600,000 DC residents don't have a vote in Congress -- http://www.dcvote.org/ http://www.dcvote.org/about/index.cfm ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[Talk-at] Fahrradstraße
Über Begegnungszonen haben wir schon diskutiert, über Fahrradstraßen - die genauso neu in der StVO sind - glaube ich noch nicht. Für eine Fahrradstraße gilt im wesentlichen: bicycle=designated vehicle=destination maxspeed=30 Im Wiki findet sich ein Tag bicycle_road=yes, zu dem es nie ein Proposal gab. Die Wiki-Seite beschreibt nur die Fahrradstraßen nach bundesdeutschem Recht, so dass selbst wenn Anwendungen dieses Tag auswerten würden, für österreichische Fahrradstraßen was Falsches herauskommen würde. Bisher dachte ich, Fahrradstraßen gibt es in AT sowieso nur am Papier. Aber nun bin ich in der Kuchelauer Hafenstraße einer leibhaftigen begegnet. Nun fragt sich, wie wir solche Straßen taggen wollen. Wenn wir bicycle_road=yes verwenden, sollten wir im Wiki die österreichische Rechtslage ergänzen. Wenn wir mit bicycle_road=yes die Tags bicycle=designated + vehicle=destination + maxspeed=30 implizieren wollen, müssen wir das auch auf http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Austria bzw. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Maxspeed#Austria irgendwie vermerken. -- Friedrich K. Volkmann http://www.volki.at/ Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at
Re: [Talk-cz] Restrukturalizace Wiki
Ahoj, Freemap - docela dost blbý název = nikdy se mi nelíbil ;-) Když už přejmenovat, tak na něco smysluplného. A na starou stránku, bych dal přesměrování - alespoň v tomto případe. Marián Dne 6.5.2015 v 09:08 Dalibor Jelínek napsal(a): Ahoj, spatne vidim to, ze nektere stranky mohou byt uz historicky nalinkovane treba z mailing listu a ted se jen tak presunou a zmizi. Napr. WikiProject Czech Republic/freemap http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Czech_Republic/freemap Take pochybuji, ze az to nekdo zacne prejmenovat, tak, ze se bude predelavat i s internima linkama mezi strankama na wiki. Ale uvidime. Dalibor *From:*Jan Breuer [mailto:jan.bre...@jaybee.cz] *Sent:* Tuesday, May 5, 2015 2:51 PM *To:* OpenStreetMap Czech Republic *Subject:* Re: [Talk-cz] Restrukturalizace Wiki Ahoj, co je špatně na prefixu Cs: pro stránky, které jsou v češtině a ještě ho nemají? Honza Dne 5. května 2015 12:29 Dalibor Jelínek dali...@dalibor.cz mailto:dali...@dalibor.cz napsal(a): Ahoj, nechcete nekdo prispet do debaty tady? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category_talk:Czech_Documentation A zastat se kategorie, ktera sdruzuje vsechny stranky v ceskem jazyce? Prilis aktivni uzvatel se rozhodl, ze je tahle kategorie pro nas zbytecna a navic ma podle vsehov planu prejmenovavat ceske stranky, ktere se nejmenuji podle tvaru Cs:*. Predem dekuji, Dalibor ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org mailto:Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
[OSRM-talk] Map Matching Plugin Questions
Hi all, I'm currently playing with the new map matching plugin in OSRM 4.6.0. Great work! It's been really useful for me so far. I also read the corresponding paper by Newson and Krumm and have some questions about the implementation: - Did you implement all of the described HMM break conditions (route localization, low probability routes, GPS outliers)? After reading the code in OSRM, I was only able to find the low probability routes condition. Did I overlook something? - As far as I understand, MAX_DISTANCE_DELTA corresponds to the delta when comparing the route length and great circle distance for the low probability routes condition. The paper states a delta of 2000m, the implementation uses a delta of 200m. Feature or bug? - What exactly does the confidence return value mean? Thanks! Best, Matthias -- Matthias Schwamborn University of Osnabrück Tel.: +49-541-969-7167 Institute of Computer Science Fax:+49-541-969-2799 Albrechtstr. 28 E-mail: schwamb...@informatik.uos.de D-49076 Osnabrück, Germany http://cs.uos.de/schwamborn/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ OSRM-talk mailing list OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] What extra permissions are needed to include CC-BY data in OSM
My, very conservative, reading of CC-BY 4.0 would indicate that it has additional issues over just the attribution problem for databases. CC-BY 4.0 contains the following (4.b): if You include all or a substantial portion of the database contents in a database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights, then the database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights (but not its individual contents) is Adapted Material; and Adapted Material is essentially a derivative Work, or using ODbL terms a derivative database. The CC-BY terms would however seem to make it impossible to create an ODbL collective database from an OSM dataset including CC-BY material. I think things are getting a little mixed up. The ODbL refers to Derivative Databases and Produced Works but not Derivative Works (well, except one, but I think that line exists because of poor drafting, not a deliberate choice). I *think* you are gesturing toward Produced Works and how the full ODbL does not attach to them, and conflating this idea with CC-BY's Adapted Material. ODbL Produced Works lose license restrictions; CC-BY Adapted Material may gain them. Perhaps this contrast is confusing the situation? Deeming something to be CC-BY Adapted Material gives the creator *more* control over its license status, not less, because CC-BY is not designed with virality in mind. This is implicitly affirmed in 3(a)(4), which mentions the application of other licenses to Adapted Material. The portion of the license following the and in your excerpt simply points to CC-BY's attribution requirements, which must follow the contributed content through into the Adapted Material. These attribution requirements are extremely generous: You may satisfy the conditions in Section 3(a)(1) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode#s3a1 in any reasonable manner based on the medium, means, and context in which You Share the Licensed Material. I think the vast quantity of CC-BY licenses data is too important a resource to ignore given the slightness of this limitation, but I understand the need for conservatism. One of Creative Commons' US affiliates is located at a law school here in Washington, DC -- I've reached out to see if they might be able to help. Tom ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Recherche avec orthographe approximative
Salut Jour de fête est une sur-couche (proxy, intermédiaire, ...) de Nominatim qui apporte de la souplesse dans les expressions recherchées. Par contre il me semble être dédié à la langue française. Le 23 mars 2015 20:16, Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr a écrit : L'outil est intéressant. Il y aurait sûrement intérêt à perfectionner un tel outil. Nominatim est peu performant pour les recherches. 1 couverture Est-il possible que cet outil ne couvre que la France? Recherche Montreal, par exemple, ne retourne pas Montréal, Québec. C'est plus grand que Montréal-en-Gers quand même! 2. recherche autre qu'a partir du début de l'expression La recherche est intéressante si je donne les infos à partir du début. Y ajouter la recherche n'importe où dans le texte rendrait cet outil encore beaucoup plus performant. Exemple st-symforien me renvoi comme réponse Saint-Symphorien symforien ne me renvoi pas Saint-Symphorien Pierre De : Simon msr...@gmail.com À : Discussions sur OSM en français talk-fr@openstreetmap.org Envoyé le : Lundi 23 mars 2015 14h37 Objet : [OSM-talk-fr] Recherche avec orthographe approximative Enfin une recherche d'adresse pour ceux qui on de gros souci d'orthographe comme moi http://jdf.geovelo.fr/ Si je recherche la rue sun onore, pari il me trouve bien la Rue Saint-Honoré, Paris en plus c'est libre et c'est basé sur OSM Simon ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr -- Cyrille. ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap newbie - help/guidance to convert OSM XML data to .gpx
Hi Paul, thanks. I tried JOSM, but probably because I have no idea what I'm doing, I cannot open the .xml generated file. The message that I get is No data found in file 'output.xml'. I attach the file that I'm trying to load, in case I'm doing something obviouosly wrong. Thanks, On 6 May 2015 at 09:31, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Ángel de Vicente angel.vicente.garr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, a complete newbie to Openstreetmap here, so bear with me... Briefly, what I'm, trying to achieve is the following: I have a .gpx file from a bike ride, and I want to use the gps data to get images from those locations from Google Street View. But, GPS not being that accurate, I first want to massage the .gpx file and obtain a .gpx file where the coordinates have been matched to the closest road. JOSM can convert back and forth between the two formats. Please be aware that Google Street View is widely regarded to be an unsuitable data source, so please do not edit based on Street View. ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 standalone=yes?resultdiaryentriesentryroutelink src=278449946 id=101549311 dst=1172664894wpt y=28.465961 x=-16.269638/wpt y=28.465961 x=-16.269638/wpt y=28.465895 x=-16.269842/wpt y=28.46583 x=-16.270044//linklink src=1172664894 id=158914755 dst=278449944/link src=278449944 id=158914755 dst=1175681417wpt y=28.465715 x=-16.270061/wpt y=28.46556 x=-16.269997/wpt y=28.465427 x=-16.26994/wpt y=28.465242 x=-16.269863//linklink src=1175681417 id=158922685 dst=1175681346wpt y=28.465086 x=-16.270037/wpt y=28.464958 x=-16.270391/wpt y=28.4649 x=-16.270557//linklink src=1175681346 id=158922685 dst=1175681437wpt y=28.464842 x=-16.270725/wpt y=28.464739 x=-16.271027/wpt y=28.464655 x=-16.271275//linklink src=1175681437 id=160028684 dst=1175681364wpt y=28.464605 x=-16.271442/wpt y=28.464567 x=-16.271595//linklink src=1175681364 id=160028684 dst=1175681342wpt y=28.464487 x=-16.271858/wpt y=28.464434 x=-16.272022//linklink src=1175681342 id=160028684 dst=1175681433wpt y=28.46433 x=-16.27234/wpt y=28.464268 x=-16.27253//linklink src=1175681433 id=160028684 dst=1175681317wpt y=28.464138 x=-16.272818//linklink src=1175681317 id=217483498 dst=1175681344wpt y=28.464031 x=-16.272917/wpt y=28.463835 x=-16.273035/wpt y=28.463696 x=-16.27311/wpt y=28.463472 x=-16.273232/wpt y=28.463354 x=-16.273294//linklink src=1175681344 id=217483498 dst=1175681410wpt y=28.463156 x=-16.273489//linklink src=1175681410 id=216257195 dst=1175660832wpt y=28.463118 x=-16.273653//linklink src=1175660832 id=101835689 dst=2077252672wpt y=28.463074 x=-16.273882/wpt y=28.463036 x=-16.274168/wpt y=28.463005 x=-16.274378//linklink src=2077252672 id=101835689 dst=1175660838wpt y=28.462984 x=-16.274527/wpt y=28.462952 x=-16.274761/wpt y=28.4629 x=-16.275124/wpt y=28.462881 x=-16.27527/wpt y=28.462862 x=-16.275414//linklink src=1175660838 id=101835689 dst=1175660756wpt y=28.462831 x=-16.27567/wpt y=28.462801 x=-16.275925/wpt y=28.462786 x=-16.276045/wpt y=28.462755 x=-16.276299/wpt y=28.462736 x=-16.276463//linklink src=1175660756 id=28699488 dst=286798350wpt y=28.462757 x=-16.276642/wpt y=28.462921 x=-16.276829/wpt y=28.463148 x=-16.276909/wpt y=28.463383 x=-16.276936/wpt y=28.463585 x=-16.276876//linklink src=286798350 id=111721209 dst=1175660892wpt y=28.463755 x=-16.276758/wpt y=28.46384 x=-16.276672//linklink src=1175660892 id=111721209 dst=286798367wpt y=28.46391 x=-16.276592/wpt y=28.463995 x=-16.276463/wpt y=28.464087 x=-16.276333/wpt y=28.464272 x=-16.27621/wpt y=28.464512 x=-16.276228/wpt y=28.464638 x=-16.276342//linklink src=286798367 id=190653537 dst=270899350wpt y=28.464703 x=-16.276583/wpt y=28.464685 x=-16.276743/wpt y=28.464607 x=-16.276953//linklink src=270899350 id=190653537 dst=286800099wpt y=28.464561 x=-16.277086/wpt y=28.464497 x=-16.27735//linklink src=286800099 id=160028712 dst=1003914048/link src=1003914048 id=111721217 dst=270899349wpt y=28.464436 x=-16.27759/wpt y=28.464386 x=-16.277843/wpt y=28.464346 x=-16.278078//linklink src=270899349 id=224692904 dst=286800305/link src=286800305 id=224692904 dst=1509819686wpt y=28.4643 x=-16.278332/wpt y=28.46426 x=-16.278517/wpt y=28.4642 x=-16.278751/wpt y=28.464138 x=-16.278917//linklink src=1509819686 id=224692904 dst=1509819655wpt y=28.464016 x=-16.279146/wpt y=28.463913 x=-16.279293/wpt y=28.463772 x=-16.279451//linklink src=1509819655 id=224692904 dst=270899345wpt y=28.463634 x=-16.279566/wpt y=28.463495 x=-16.279676//linklink src=270899345 id=224692904 dst=281240935wpt y=28.46334 x=-16.279789/wpt y=28.463202 x=-16.279892/wpt y=28.463058 x=-16.28001/wpt y=28.4629 x=-16.280136/wpt y=28.462736 x=-16.280214//linklink src=281240935 id=224692904 dst=1509819383wpt y=28.462568 x=-16.280226/wpt y=28.46237 x=-16.280153/wpt y=28.462158 x=-16.280035//linklink src=1509819383 id=224692904 dst=2009775157wpt y=28.461954 x=-16.279922/wpt y=28.461782 x=-16.279854/wpt y=28.46157 x=-16.279797/wpt y=28.461393 x=-16.279854/wpt
Re: [Talk-it] [Off topic] Messaggi marcati come spam
On 2015-05-06 at 12:42:54 +0200, Francesco Pelullo wrote: Da qualche tempo i messaggi della lista che provengono da mittenti @ libero.it vengono classificati come spam da Gmail. mi viene da sospettare che sia dovuto ai recenti invii di spam a nome di account libero.it Premesso che il problema è di Gmail e non di talk-it, volevo sapere se succede anche a voi ed eventualmente come avete risolto. segnare manualmente come non spam i messaggi delle liste un po' aiuta, anche se l'effetto non è di lunga durata. Quando capita che l'interfaccia chieda se inviare i messaggi segnati come non-spam al loro team di solito lo faccio (ovviamente se sono solo messaggi di liste pubbliche), sperando che anche questo aiuti. -- Elena ``of Valhalla'' ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Comune di milano usa mappa osm per il routing
Ciao Cesare, Il giorno 6 maggio 2015 13:32, cesare gerbino cesaregerb...@gmail.com ha scritto: è da intendere che integrate al vostro interno i dati di civici di OSM + quelli della città? Oppure questi ultimi sono open data e se si mi potresti indicare dove scaricarli? La prima che hai detto. Allo stato attuale il comune non rilascia i civici in opendata, li possiamo usare internamente senza divulgarli. Grazie e complimenti per il lavoro fatto Grazie a te :) Sig ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap newbie - help/guidance to convert OSM XML data to .gpx
Hi Paul, sorry, let's see if I can explain myself better. The attachment in my previous mail is what I got from the page https://mapmatching.3scale.net/ That file contains good data but in a format that I don't know how to deal with. I would like only to convert that .xml file to a .gpx file with latitude and longitude coordinates. But when I try to open with JOSM that file (output.xml), it complains that no data was found (and thus I don't see any Convert option when I right click the output.xml layer. I hope now it is a bitt more clear. Thanks a lot Angel de Vicente https://mapmatching.3scale.net/ On 6 May 2015 at 14:21, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote: OK, I seem to have misunderstood the situation, then. You're trying to convert OSM data to GPX, and vice versa, no? If that's the case, right click on the layer and select Convert to... On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Ángel de Vicente angel.vicente.garr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Paul, thanks. I tried JOSM, but probably because I have no idea what I'm doing, I cannot open the .xml generated file. The message that I get is No data found in file 'output.xml'. I attach the file that I'm trying to load, in case I'm doing something obviouosly wrong. Thanks, On 6 May 2015 at 09:31, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Ángel de Vicente angel.vicente.garr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, a complete newbie to Openstreetmap here, so bear with me... Briefly, what I'm, trying to achieve is the following: I have a .gpx file from a bike ride, and I want to use the gps data to get images from those locations from Google Street View. But, GPS not being that accurate, I first want to massage the .gpx file and obtain a .gpx file where the coordinates have been matched to the closest road. JOSM can convert back and forth between the two formats. Please be aware that Google Street View is widely regarded to be an unsuitable data source, so please do not edit based on Street View. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap newbie - help/guidance to convert OSM XML data to .gpx
I'm curious what the DOCTYPE is on the XML being put out, that might provide some clues. On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Ángel de Vicente angel.vicente.garr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Paul, sorry, let's see if I can explain myself better. The attachment in my previous mail is what I got from the page https://mapmatching.3scale.net/ That file contains good data but in a format that I don't know how to deal with. I would like only to convert that .xml file to a .gpx file with latitude and longitude coordinates. But when I try to open with JOSM that file (output.xml), it complains that no data was found (and thus I don't see any Convert option when I right click the output.xml layer. I hope now it is a bitt more clear. Thanks a lot Angel de Vicente https://mapmatching.3scale.net/ On 6 May 2015 at 14:21, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote: OK, I seem to have misunderstood the situation, then. You're trying to convert OSM data to GPX, and vice versa, no? If that's the case, right click on the layer and select Convert to... On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Ángel de Vicente angel.vicente.garr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Paul, thanks. I tried JOSM, but probably because I have no idea what I'm doing, I cannot open the .xml generated file. The message that I get is No data found in file 'output.xml'. I attach the file that I'm trying to load, in case I'm doing something obviouosly wrong. Thanks, On 6 May 2015 at 09:31, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote: On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Ángel de Vicente angel.vicente.garr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, a complete newbie to Openstreetmap here, so bear with me... Briefly, what I'm, trying to achieve is the following: I have a .gpx file from a bike ride, and I want to use the gps data to get images from those locations from Google Street View. But, GPS not being that accurate, I first want to massage the .gpx file and obtain a .gpx file where the coordinates have been matched to the closest road. JOSM can convert back and forth between the two formats. Please be aware that Google Street View is widely regarded to be an unsuitable data source, so please do not edit based on Street View. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-at] Fahrradstraße
Hallo, ich bin für die Verwendung von explizitem Tagging in Kombination mit bicycle_road=yes - so wie sie auch in der Wiki bereits für Deutschland beschrieben ist [1]. Warum? - Das explizite Tagging macht es Anwendungen, denen Fahrradfahren im Prinip egal ist leicht: maxspeed=30 source:maxspeed=AT:bicycle_road vehicle=destination (bzw. vehicle=yes wenn die Durchfahrt durch ein Zusatzschild erlaubt ist - wie es z.B. bei einer Fahrradstraße in Hard in Vorarlberg der Fall ist) bicycle=designated - Das zusätzliche bicycle_road=yes hilft auf das Fahrrad bezogenen Anwendungen wie z.B. Fahrradrouting oder Fahrradkarten. Da ist die Information, dass es sich um eine Fahrradstraße handelt spannend, denn abgesehen von den beschriebenen Eigenschaften ist es auf Fahrradstraßen legal mit dem Fahrrad nebeneinander zu fahren (und ich glaub noch ein paar andere Dinge, die das Radfahren dort angenehmer machen sollen). LG, Markus / evod P.S.: die Hasnerstraße ist keine Fahrradstraße laut StVO, nur eine fahrradfreundliche Straße ohne weitere StVO-Implikationen. P.P.S.: die Hofjagdstraße ist Wiens zweite Fahrradstraße: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316401060 [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle_road On 2015-05-06 18:41, Norbert Wenzel wrote: On 05/06/2015 04:22 PM, Friedrich Volkmann wrote: Für eine Fahrradstraße gilt im wesentlichen: bicycle=designated vehicle=destination maxspeed=30 [...] Bisher dachte ich, Fahrradstraßen gibt es in AT sowieso nur am Papier. Aber nun bin ich in der Kuchelauer Hafenstraße einer leibhaftigen begegnet. Die Hasnerstraße im 16ten sollte auch eine solche sein, wenn ich mich richtig erinner. Nun fragt sich, wie wir solche Straßen taggen wollen. Wenn wir bicycle_road=yes verwenden, sollten wir im Wiki die österreichische Rechtslage ergänzen. Wenn wir mit bicycle_road=yes die Tags bicycle=designated + vehicle=destination + maxspeed=30 implizieren wollen, müssen wir das auch auf http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Austria bzw. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Maxspeed#Austria irgendwie vermerken. Ich denke wir sollte es so explizit wie möglich taggen und (wenn es denn von der StVO her stimmt, das hab ich nicht kontrolliert) zwar so wie du oben beschrieben hast. Es ist ja schon bei den Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkungen eine nette Idee, dass Router irgendwelche nationalen Vorgaben (Ortsgebiet) automatisch auswerten, aber das funktioniert schon da nicht. Ich denke je expliziter wir das an die Straße mappen (ev. zusätzlich das ohnehin ignorierte bicycle_road=yes, oder einen Kommentar) desto verständlicher bleibt das für alle die mit den Daten arbeiten müssen. Norbert ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at
Re: [Talk-br] TAGs admin_center ou capital ?
Marcio Como o node e ligado diretamente com o relação com o papel admin_centre, não mais tem necessidade de usar admin_level ou capital no node. O que e certo e usar admin_center, e talvez também label no relação, so isso. o tag admin_level não faz sentido no o node, e capital e evidente por o papel admin_centre Preciso ter bastante cuidado incluir o tag place nos relações de limites administrativos, algum deles pode ser certo combinar com place (por exemplo no estado) e outros não Aun Johnsen On May 6, 2015, at 19:14, thunder...@gpsinfo.com.br thunder...@gpsinfo.com.br wrote: Aun, mas qual usar? Pergunto porque não cheguei a conclusão alguma do padrão que estamos empregando no Brasil. Alguns inserem na relação boundary o admin_center, outros excluem da relação e em alguns lugares nunca inseriram capital e tampouco admin_centre na relação. Aproveito para parabeniza-lo porque identifico que você formatou todos os municípios do espírito santo com admin_centre nas relações boundarys, entretanto ao norte, na Bahia, a maioria dos municípios tem a relação boundary, mas sem o admin_centre. A nível renderizador nos é fornecido um arquivo resultado de um pré-processamento dos dados OSM extraindo dele as relações boundary com os admin_center delas. Observe um corte do print dessa imagem aberta: boundary[1].jpg Essa imagem pega a área Norte do Espírito Santo e a Sul da Bahia. A cor verde escura nos boudarys significa que aquele boundary não tem a TAG place. A verde clara significa que tem. As cidades que estão como admin_centre da relação boundary são estampadas na cor referente ao tipo de place dela. Tirem suas conclusões. []s Marcio From: Lists mailto:li...@gimnechiske.org Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2015 6:43 PM To: OpenStreetMap no Brasil mailto:talk-br@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-br] TAGs admin_center ou capital ? Marcio O tag capital tambem e mais antigua que relações, acho esses duas assuntos pode ser levantados no tagging, mas provavelmente eles vai dizer para não usar. Aun Johnsen ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Re: [Talk-it] Comune di milano usa mappa osm per il routing
Il 05/06/2015 01:32 PM, cesare gerbino scrisse: Il giorno 6 maggio 2015 12:05, Luca Sigfrido Percich luca.perc...@gmail.com mailto:luca.perc...@gmail.com ha scritto: Mi sembrava strano che tu non avessi risposto. :-) Per non so quale motivo vedo la tua risposta solo come quote di un altro, boh. Ciao Maxx, il routing mi sembra abbastanza veloce. Se incappi in errori non dovuti ai dati o a problemi specifici nella navigazione ti prego di segnalarlo in modo dettagliato. Ho fatto qualche tentativo ieri sera utilizzando come destinazione la parola Expo. Dopo aver selezionato uno dei risultati proposti o mi appariva (dopo uno-due minuti) il messaggio che non era possibile trovare una rotta per quella destinazione o rimaneva la clessidra attiva senza che si visualizzasse nulla. Ho riprovato ora usando come punto di partenza via pietro borsieri e come arrivo expo 2015 circular road. Per auto, bici e pedoni nessun percorso disponibile. Con i mezzi viene trovato un percorso. Ieri avevo provato solo bici. Il tragitto suggerito e' abbastanza strano, fa passare da Paderno. Non vedo l'elenco descrittivo del percorso. Provando con un'altra destinazione appaiono anche i dettagli del percorso. Sara' Expo che non e' ancora pronto! ;-) Per la velocita' sara' che sono abituato ad osrm che e' una scheggia, difficile rivaleggiare con quel motore da questo punto di vista. Evidentemente il problema e' la destinazione Expo su cui mi ero concentrato ieri prima di postare. Io riscontro problemi di lentezza / blocco con chrome su linux, ma non sono limitati al portale della mobilità di Milano. Uso firefox, non so. Il fatto che il comune di Milano abbia deciso di utilizzare OSM per il portale e pur con tutti i limiti del caso si occupi dell'aggiornamento di OSM mi sembra parecchio positivo. Se possiamo fare qualcosa per migliorare fatecelo sapere! +1 Entro in modalita' debug. - c'e' un percorso sulla mappa, ingrandisco la mappa, sposto il segnaposto di partenza o destinazione e non succede nulla. In realta' anche quando la mappa non e' ingrandita non e' cosi' spontaneo dover cliccare sul pulsante Calcola dopo aver spostato un segnaposto. - dettagli del percorso: ci sono indicazioni diciamo imprecise, es. via paolo sarpi e piazzale baiamonti indicati con pista ciclabile. - Modi di trasporto - bicicletta - piste ciclabili. La presenza di un segnaposto in corrispondenza di un tratto di pista o corsia non rende facile la comprensione di quel che si vede. Io lo eliminerei, mi pare sia gia' chiara la linea in blu sovrapposta alla mappa. - sarebbe utile poter inserire dei punti intermedi Posso chiederti come mai non avete utilizzato osrm come motore di routing? E anche come interfaccia di partenza viste le numerose funzioni che ha gia' pronte? grazie maxx ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-br] TAGs admin_center ou capital ?
Estou trabalhando no Estado da Bahia, 75% concluído os admin_centre e revisão de duplicatas e erros. Att, BladeTC --- Mensagem Original --- De: Lists li...@gimnechiske.org Enviado: 6 de maio de 2015 19:23 Para: OpenStreetMap no Brasil talk-br@openstreetmap.org Assunto: Re: [Talk-br] TAGs admin_center ou capital ? Marcio Como o node e ligado diretamente com o relação com o papel admin_centre, não mais tem necessidade de usar admin_level ou capital no node. O que e certo e usar admin_center, e talvez também label no relação, so isso. o tag admin_level não faz sentido no o node, e capital e evidente por o papel admin_centre Preciso ter bastante cuidado incluir o tag place nos relações de limites administrativos, algum deles pode ser certo combinar com place (por exemplo no estado) e outros não Aun Johnsen On May 6, 2015, at 19:14, thunder...@gpsinfo.com.br thunder...@gpsinfo.com.br wrote: Aun, mas qual usar? Pergunto porque não cheguei a conclusão alguma do padrão que estamos empregando no Brasil. Alguns inserem na relação boundary o admin_center, outros excluem da relação e em alguns lugares nunca inseriram capital e tampouco admin_centre na relação. Aproveito para parabeniza-lo porque identifico que você formatou todos os municípios do espírito santo com admin_centre nas relações boundarys, entretanto ao norte, na Bahia, a maioria dos municípios tem a relação boundary, mas sem o admin_centre. A nível renderizador nos é fornecido um arquivo resultado de um pré-processamento dos dados OSM extraindo dele as relações boundary com os admin_center delas. Observe um corte do print dessa imagem aberta: boundary[1].jpg Essa imagem pega a área Norte do Espírito Santo e a Sul da Bahia. A cor verde escura nos boudarys significa que aquele boundary não tem a TAG place. A verde clara significa que tem. As cidades que estão como admin_centre da relação boundary são estampadas na cor referente ao tipo de place dela. Tirem suas conclusões. []s Marcio From: Lists mailto:li...@gimnechiske.org Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2015 6:43 PM To: OpenStreetMap no Brasil mailto:talk-br@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-br] TAGs admin_center ou capital ? Marcio O tag capital tambem e mais antigua que relações, acho esses duas assuntos pode ser levantados no tagging, mas provavelmente eles vai dizer para não usar. Aun Johnsen ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
[Talk-br] Erros no ID
Sim , está dando conflito comigo mesmo , mas o mais comum é não salvar , mas acho que salva , mesmo não mostrando a inserção e/ou correção feita . ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Re: [Talk-br] TAGs admin_center ou capital ?
Aun, mas qual usar? Pergunto porque não cheguei a conclusão alguma do padrão que estamos empregando no Brasil. Alguns inserem na relação boundary o admin_center, outros excluem da relação e em alguns lugares nunca inseriram capital e tampouco admin_centre na relação. Aproveito para parabeniza-lo porque identifico que você formatou todos os municípios do espírito santo com admin_centre nas relações boundarys, entretanto ao norte, na Bahia, a maioria dos municípios tem a relação boundary, mas sem o admin_centre. A nível renderizador nos é fornecido um arquivo resultado de um pré-processamento dos dados OSM extraindo dele as relações boundary com os admin_center delas. Observe um corte do print dessa imagem aberta: Essa imagem pega a área Norte do Espírito Santo e a Sul da Bahia. A cor verde escura nos boudarys significa que aquele boundary não tem a TAG place. A verde clara significa que tem. As cidades que estão como admin_centre da relação boundary são estampadas na cor referente ao tipo de place dela. Tirem suas conclusões. []s Marcio From: Lists Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2015 6:43 PM To: OpenStreetMap no Brasil Subject: Re: [Talk-br] TAGs admin_center ou capital ? Marcio O tag capital tambem e mais antigua que relações, acho esses duas assuntos pode ser levantados no tagging, mas provavelmente eles vai dizer para não usar. Aun Johnsen ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Re: [Talk-de] Wochennotiz Nr. 250 28.4.–4.5.2015
Am 06.05.2015 um 12:49 schrieb wn reader: die Wochennotiz Nr. 250 mit allen wichtigen Neuigkeiten aus der OpenStreetMap Welt ist da: http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2015/05/wochennotiz-nr-250/ Glückwunsch zum runden Ausgabe, verbunden mit einem Dank (!) an alle Aktiven für die Mühe. Grüße, Michael. ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-at] Fahrradstraße
On 06.05.2015 21:10, Thomas Konrad wrote: @Friedrich, hast du dich über die Unterschiede zur deutschen Rechtslage informiert? Wenn ja, welche gibt es da? Das kann man leicht nachlesen: DE: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stvo_2013/anlage_2.html AT: auf http://www.ris.bka.gv.at - Bundesrecht - Bundesrecht konsolidiert - Suchwort: Fahrradstraße - § 67 Generell ist die deutsche StVO kürzer und allgemeiner formuliert als die österreichische. Bezüglich Fahrradstraßen ist der wesentliche Unterschied, dass in AT Autos sie befahren dürfen, in DE nicht. Unsere Volksvertreter haben von den Deutschen den schönen Namen abgeschaut, aber nicht den Inhalt. Die Fahrradstraße nach österreichischer Definition verdient ihren Namen nicht. Praktisch ist es eine stinknormale Straße mit 30er. Wie in Wohnstraßen wird das Durchfahrtsverbot für Kfz nicht kontrolliert. -- Friedrich K. Volkmann http://www.volki.at/ Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at
Re: [Talk-br] Brasília - DF
2015-05-06 17:54 GMT-03:00 thunder...@gpsinfo.com.br: É correto se empregar admin_level para ponto? admin_level não só é empregado para relation=boundary? Ou estou completamente equivocado? Errado não é, mas também não está 100% certo. Pode retirar o admin_level do nó de Brasília. Já é a segunda vez que algum estrangeiro mexe nisso, de forma errada, e sem perguntar. ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Re: [Talk-br] Brasília - DF
Tava um discussão muito tempo atras sobre uso do admin_level no node do place, para identificar do o que o no e admin_center, isso fui antes do implantação do relações, e não mais necessário. Aun Johnsen On May 6, 2015, at 18:10, thunder...@gpsinfo.com.br thunder...@gpsinfo.com.br wrote: Agradeço Nelson. Vou retirar o admin_level=2 de lá e aguardar até amanhã para renderizar novo mapa Cocar e ver se o problema da duplicação não ocorre de novo. []s Marcio -Mensagem Original- From: Nelson A. de Oliveira Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2015 6:03 PM To: OpenStreetMap no Brasil Subject: Re: [Talk-br] Brasília - DF 2015-05-06 17:54 GMT-03:00 thunder...@gpsinfo.com.br: É correto se empregar admin_level para ponto? admin_level não só é empregado para relation=boundary? Ou estou completamente equivocado? Errado não é, mas também não está 100% certo. Pode retirar o admin_level do nó de Brasília. Já é a segunda vez que algum estrangeiro mexe nisso, de forma errada, e sem perguntar. ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly Project All things delivery-related - an update
On 2015-05-06 21:09, Philip Barnes wrote: On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 19:47 +0100, Rob Nickerson wrote: That's interesting. Have just tried the app out. It gives you the postboxes in OpenStreetMap but not the ones that are missing (as shown by blue markers on Robert's comparison tool: http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postboxes/ Looks interesting and show maybe I should pay post boxes more attention. One issue I have with the postbox map, is the the area it returns is too small. There are towns that cannot be reached as a result. For example I enter SY4, and the rectangle returned misses Wem completely. Drag the map to the correct place, then click the Permalink button (in the bottom right). That will give you the postboxes centred on that view. Or you can use the link for OSM Post Box Progress, then pick your postcode area and district. That will show you a map of all of the postboxes in the district. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-at] Fahrradstraße
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 06:41:22PM +0200, Norbert Wenzel wrote: On 05/06/2015 04:22 PM, Friedrich Volkmann wrote: Bisher dachte ich, Fahrradstraßen gibt es in AT sowieso nur am Papier. Aber nun bin ich in der Kuchelauer Hafenstraße einer leibhaftigen begegnet. Die Hasnerstraße im 16ten sollte auch eine solche sein, wenn ich mich richtig erinner. Nein. Die Hasnerstraße wurde noch vor der rechtlichen Einführung gebaut. Wahrscheinlich wäre sie eine geworden, wenn das umgekehrt gewesen wäre. Keine Ahnung, warum man sie jetzt nicht als Fahrradstraße deklariert, tatsache ist, dass sie keine ist (ich fahr dort häufig durch, dort sind keine entsprechenden Schilder). gruesse, Stephan -- Seid unbequem, seid Sand, nicht Öl im Getriebe der Welt! - Günther Eich ,-. | Stephan Bösch-Plepelits,| | Technische Universität Wien -Studien Informatik Raumplanung | | Projects: | | openstreetbrowser.org couchsurfing.org tubasis.at bl.mud.at | | Contact:| | Mail: sk...@xover.mud.at Blog: plepe.at | | Twitter: twitter.com/plepe Jabber: sk...@jabber.at | `-' ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at
Re: [OSM-talk] contact: tags
e.g. a general contact telephone number and, say, an emergency or reservations or god-knows-what other telephone number. Yeah, but the obvious simple solution for that is a phone:emergency, phone:reception or whatever comes up often. __ openstreetmap.org/user/AndiG88 wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:AndiG88 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[Talk-br] Erros no ID
O ID a pelo menos 3 dias está apresentando falhas intermitentes na hora de salvar . Algumas ele não salva , outras ele diz que há uma outra modificação feita pelo proprio usuário no mesmo instante e pergunta o que deva ser feito . ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
[Talk-br] TAGs admin_center ou capital ?
Amigos, qual a orientação no Brasil para configuração da cidade onde se encontra o governo de um estado ou município? Identificamos que alguns empregam a TAG capital no ponto e outros a TAG admin_centre na relação. Pelo wiki só identificamos ambos a nível proposta. []s Marcio___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Re: [Talk-br] Erros no ID
Também observei isso e por essa razão passei a empregar mais o JOSM. From: belnu...@pop.com.br Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2015 6:33 PM To: talk-br@openstreetmap.org Subject: [Talk-br] Erros no ID O ID a pelo menos 3 dias está apresentando falhas intermitentes na hora de salvar . Algumas ele não salva , outras ele diz que há uma outra modificação feita pelo proprio usuário no mesmo instante e pergunta o que deva ser feito . ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Re: [Talk-br] Brasília - DF
Agradeço Nelson. Vou retirar o admin_level=2 de lá e aguardar até amanhã para renderizar novo mapa Cocar e ver se o problema da duplicação não ocorre de novo. []s Marcio -Mensagem Original- From: Nelson A. de Oliveira Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2015 6:03 PM To: OpenStreetMap no Brasil Subject: Re: [Talk-br] Brasília - DF 2015-05-06 17:54 GMT-03:00 thunder...@gpsinfo.com.br: É correto se empregar admin_level para ponto? admin_level não só é empregado para relation=boundary? Ou estou completamente equivocado? Errado não é, mas também não está 100% certo. Pode retirar o admin_level do nó de Brasília. Já é a segunda vez que algum estrangeiro mexe nisso, de forma errada, e sem perguntar. ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Re: [OSM-talk] contact: tags
the verbosity may be unneeded for very simple things like phone but is that true for everything covered by contact* ? key:fax? key:twitter? key:vhf? So what would you do with those tags? If we don't use contact for phone, it makes no sense at all to use it for something like social media etc. In addition I think if the emphasis on contact was really that you can actually contact someone (contact:phone) then contact:twitter is also flat out wrong, because many companies will not reply and maybe not even read what you tweet them. __ openstreetmap.org/user/AndiG88 wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:AndiG88 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-br] TAGs admin_center ou capital ?
Marcio O tag capital tambem e mais antigua que relações, acho esses duas assuntos pode ser levantados no tagging, mas provavelmente eles vai dizer para não usar. Aun Johnsen On May 6, 2015, at 18:36, thunder...@gpsinfo.com.br thunder...@gpsinfo.com.br wrote: Amigos, qual a orientação no Brasil para configuração da cidade onde se encontra o governo de um estado ou município? Identificamos que alguns empregam a TAG capital no ponto e outros a TAG admin_centre na relação. Pelo wiki só identificamos ambos a nível proposta. []s Marcio ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
[Talk-se] OpenStreetMap i Göteborgs-Posten
På sistone har Göteborgs-Posten illustrerat en del artiklar med kartbilder baserade på OSM, t.ex. [1]. Kanske det är TT Bild (f.d. Scanpix) som står för detta? Man har även en interaktiv karta som visar cykelproblem i Göteborg [2], och denna är gjord med CartoDB som använder OSM-data. Kul att OSM börjar synas lite här och var även i mainstream-media i Sverige! /Erik [1] http://www.gp.se/nyheter/sverige/1.2701877-oppna-dorrar-forvarrade-asylbrand [2] http://www.gp.se/nyheter/goteborg/1.2707193-goteborg-tappar-i-cykelrankning ___ Talk-se mailing list Talk-se@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-se
Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly Project All things delivery-related - an update
On 2015-05-06 19:47, Rob Nickerson wrote: That's interesting. Have just tried the app out. It gives you the postboxes in OpenStreetMap but not the ones that are missing (as shown by blue markers on Robert's comparison tool: http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postboxes/ I really do feel like we are missing a trick here. As the map becomes more and more complete it becomes harder and harder to find something to map (example: I spend more time trying to find missing footpaths that I can map on a circular walk now than 2-3 years ago). An app that helps people find what's missing whilst out surveying could really help. I only wish I had the skills and time to do this. The Post Hoc map has the option of exporting a GPX file. That will include any missing boxes, or boxes with missing refs etc. So you could download that GPX, then load it onto a Garmin, or on a phone app etc. For Android, you could try OSMAnd, it can load GPX files. Or maybe Maps.Me, if you convert it to a KML file. Then you can go out and survey them. Note the Royal Mail locations can be very inaccurate, some of them are on completely the wrong street, or hundreds of metres away. So it can be difficult to actually find the postbox. And there are a few on the Royal Mail list that have now been removed, or where the number on the box doesn't match the list. Craig ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-br] Brasília - DF
Eu já tinha falado pra um aqui http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28340149 ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Re: [Talk-br] Erros no ID
2015-05-06 18:33 GMT-03:00 belnu...@pop.com.br: O ID a pelo menos 3 dias está apresentando falhas intermitentes na hora de salvar . Algumas ele não salva , outras ele diz que há uma outra modificação feita pelo proprio usuário no mesmo instante e pergunta o que deva ser feito Está dando conflito com você mesmo? ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
[OSM-talk] Learn Rails
Code academy have added Ruby on Rails, which is what OpenStreetMap uses for the website. Learn via their online interactive learning. http://www.codecademy.com/learn/learn-rails You never know, you could be contributing to OpenStreetMap code soon after :) ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly Project All things delivery-related - an update
On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 19:47 +0100, Rob Nickerson wrote: That's interesting. Have just tried the app out. It gives you the postboxes in OpenStreetMap but not the ones that are missing (as shown by blue markers on Robert's comparison tool: http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postboxes/ Looks interesting and show maybe I should pay post boxes more attention. One issue I have with the postbox map, is the the area it returns is too small. There are towns that cannot be reached as a result. For example I enter SY4, and the rectangle returned misses Wem completely. Phil (trigpoint) ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-br] Erros no ID
Isso tinha no JOSM ha muito tempo, e chama resolução do conflitos. No JOSM ate dar para fazer comparação do objeto local (seu) e no servidor para analizar o que e melhor, e salvar objeto local/remote para terminar o conflito. Acho bom que iD começando ser ciente isso, mas tem duvida que ele vai tratar eles bem. Aun Johnsen On May 6, 2015, at 18:33, belnu...@pop.com.br wrote: O ID a pelo menos 3 dias está apresentando falhas intermitentes na hora de salvar . Algumas ele não salva , outras ele diz que há uma outra modificação feita pelo proprio usuário no mesmo instante e pergunta o que deva ser feito . ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Re: [Talk-br] Erros no ID
a resoluçao de conflitos aparece justamente quando nao sao salvas algumas edicoes que voce fez. ao tentar salvar depois, aparece a mensagem de modificacoes feitas por outro usuario (no caso, voce mesmo). Em qua, 6 de mai de 2015 às 18:42, thunder...@gpsinfo.com.br escreveu: Também observei isso e por essa razão passei a empregar mais o JOSM. *From:* belnu...@pop.com.br *Sent:* Wednesday, May 6, 2015 6:33 PM *To:* talk-br@openstreetmap.org *Subject:* [Talk-br] Erros no ID O ID a pelo menos 3 dias está apresentando falhas intermitentes na hora de salvar . Algumas ele não salva , outras ele diz que há uma outra modificação feita pelo proprio usuário no mesmo instante e pergunta o que deva ser feito . ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
[Talk-de] OSM im ZDF bei Letzte Spur Berlin
Hi, ich schaue gerade aus der ZDF-Mediathek eine Folge Letzte Spur Berlin (Vergessen). Ungefähr bei Minute 12 wird da ein schöner großer Ausdruck einer Karte zum Draufrum-Malen auf den Tisch gelegt und ich dachte: kenn ich doch ;) - scheint mir der Standard-Style zu sein, aber selbstgerendert mit hoher Auflösung und nicht ge-screen-shottet. http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/lsb.png Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33 ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-it] Diminuzione Tag totali wikipedia
Continuo ad utilizzare con entusiasmo il tool :-) http://geodati.fmach.it/gfoss_geodata/osm/wtosm/it_IT/ ma ho notato che ieri c'e' stata una drastica diminuzione dei tag totali mappati: -477. Chiedo se qualcuno (a tempo perso) puo' verificare la causa. Grazie. -- Marco_T -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Diminuzione-Tag-totali-wikipedia-tp5824663p5843570.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] [Off topic] Messaggi marcati come spam
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 12:42:54PM +0200, Francesco Pelullo wrote: Ciao a tutti, Da qualche tempo i messaggi della lista che provengono da mittenti @ libero.it vengono classificati come spam da Gmail. Libero ha subito il furto delle rubriche diverse volte: http://www.dreamsworld.it/emanuele/2014-12-10/i-server-di-libero-sono-stati-bucati-e-wind-lo-sa/ per cui, a causa della montagna di spam a nome di utenti di libero, gmail ha cominciato a filtrare... come regalare la gestione della posta (e pubblicità connessa) a google... -- Marco Ciampa I know a joke about UDP, but you might not get it. ++ | GNU/Linux User #78271 | | FSFE fellow #364 | ++ ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-at] Fahrradstraße
On 05/06/2015 04:22 PM, Friedrich Volkmann wrote: Für eine Fahrradstraße gilt im wesentlichen: bicycle=designated vehicle=destination maxspeed=30 [...] Bisher dachte ich, Fahrradstraßen gibt es in AT sowieso nur am Papier. Aber nun bin ich in der Kuchelauer Hafenstraße einer leibhaftigen begegnet. Die Hasnerstraße im 16ten sollte auch eine solche sein, wenn ich mich richtig erinner. Nun fragt sich, wie wir solche Straßen taggen wollen. Wenn wir bicycle_road=yes verwenden, sollten wir im Wiki die österreichische Rechtslage ergänzen. Wenn wir mit bicycle_road=yes die Tags bicycle=designated + vehicle=destination + maxspeed=30 implizieren wollen, müssen wir das auch auf http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Austria bzw. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Maxspeed#Austria irgendwie vermerken. Ich denke wir sollte es so explizit wie möglich taggen und (wenn es denn von der StVO her stimmt, das hab ich nicht kontrolliert) zwar so wie du oben beschrieben hast. Es ist ja schon bei den Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkungen eine nette Idee, dass Router irgendwelche nationalen Vorgaben (Ortsgebiet) automatisch auswerten, aber das funktioniert schon da nicht. Ich denke je expliziter wir das an die Straße mappen (ev. zusätzlich das ohnehin ignorierte bicycle_road=yes, oder einen Kommentar) desto verständlicher bleibt das für alle die mit den Daten arbeiten müssen. Norbert ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at
[Talk-co] Museos etnográficos y casas cartográficas
Hola, Alguien conoce de proyectos relacionados con museos etnográficos y casas cartográficas en OSM? Saludos. -- __ _|_ Edwin F. Caldon _|_ Universidad del Cauca, Popayán, Colombia _|_ _|_ ¿Tiene precio la cultura? _|_ ¿Cuanto estás dispuesto a pagar por ella? _| ___ Talk-co mailing list Talk-co@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-co
Re: [Talk-de] Brunnen : Check tagging near Hannover?
Am Mittwoch, 6. Mai 2015, 09:17:00 schrieb Bryce Nesbitt: waterway=water_point is defined as a place to fill fresh water holding tanks. There are several marked as Brunnen near Hannover. Could someone check that tagging? http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/9cX Giving that the area around belongs to Wasserwerk Vlotho, I guess those are indeed wells that pump water into the punlic water system. The tagging is wrong, as Brunnen just means well, and is no name, and those are probably neither publically reachable nor for refilling your caravan. The proper tagging would probably be something like: man_made=water_well drinking_water=yes But, those would show up on the hiking map, which is equally wrong. Greetings, Eike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-de] Brunnen : Check tagging near Hannover?
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Rolf Eike Beer e...@sf-mail.de wrote: The proper tagging would probably be something like: man_made=water_well drinking_water=yes But, those would show up on the hiking map, which is equally wrong. Taginfo shows use of: pumping_station=water or man_made=pumping_station or waterway=pumping_station (some of which are sewage pumpouts for boats, e.g. waterway=sanitary_dump_station). ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-it] Info per mappatura nuove regole di navigazione a Venezia
Ciao
Il giorno 28 aprile 2015 13:00, dav...@tatanka.it ha scritto:
siamo un gruppo di canoisti e rematori che si sono attivati per fare
modificare un divieto di navigazione a kayak e barche a remi a Venezia.
...
Nel gruppo si era discusso su come compilare una mappa che contenga il
tutto, che sia interpretabile da chiunque e liberamente scaricabile e
consultabile.
In alcuni abbiamo citato OSM, ma nessuno è abbastanza ferrato da definire
come e con che tag iniziare la mappatura.
...
Grazie comunque per ogni informazione
Secondo il Wiki [0] potete usare il tag canoe=*, che si riferisce a boats
without sail or motor, such as small dinghies, canoes, kayaks, etc..
Vedo che a Venezia questo tag è già usato (forse lo avete messo voi?).
Se su un canale è sempre consentito/vietato navigare, basta aggiungere alla
way canoe=yes/canoe=no.
Se dipende dall'orario, potete usare conditional.
Es. divieto di navigazione ai mezzi senza motore di notte:
canoe:conditional=no @ (22:00-06:00)
Per informazioni su conditional:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions
e su come scrivere gli orari:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
Per controllare l'avanzamento del tagging vi può essere utile questa mappa
su Overpass Turbo:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/9dc
(La parte compresa tra {{Style}} si può anche cancellare).
Per creare una mappa vera e propria ci sono diverse possibilità.
- Creare una mappa statica (immagine png/jpg), usando programmi di
rendering come:
maperitive
tilemill
smrender (leggo che quest'ultimo è nato appositamente per mappe nautiche)
qgis
- Creare una mappa dinamica, da pubblicare su un sito, tramite:
umap
Overpass Turbo (vedi sopra)
openlayers o leaflet (per costruire una mappa personalizzata, manualmente,
da zero).
Ciao,
Simone F.
[0] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
[OSM-talk-nl] blog.opengeo.nl
Op de website: www.openstreetmap.nl is aan de rechterkant een hoofdstukje genaamd blog.opengeo.nl met teksten zoals ¨bussen volgen met OpenOV¨ Al deze teksten zijn klikbaar (selecteerbaar). Helaas, zijn de links verbroken. Voorbeeld:bussen volgen met OpenOV gaat naar: http://www.opengeo.nl/2011/02/helemaal-gewogen/ met als foutmelding: The requested URL /2011/02/helemaal-gewogen/ was not found on this server. Ronald ___ Talk-nl mailing list Talk-nl@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nl
Re: [Talk-at] Fahrradstraße
Hallo, sehe ich genauso, also explizites Tagging mit bicycle_road=yes. Was bicycle_road=yes allein implizit bedeutet sollten wir aber dennoch im Wiki wie Friedrich vorgeschlagen hat dokumentieren (wenn es Unterschiede zu Deutschland gibt) - falls jemand eine Straße nur mit bicycle_road=yes versieht (nicht alle werden sich an das halten worauf man sich hier auf der Mailingliste einigt). Die Wiki-Seite beschreibt nur die Fahrradstraßen nach bundesdeutschem Recht, so dass selbst wenn Anwendungen dieses Tag auswerten würden, für österreichische Fahrradstraßen was Falsches herauskommen würde. @Friedrich, hast du dich über die Unterschiede zur deutschen Rechtslage informiert? Wenn ja, welche gibt es da? Schöne Grüße Thomas On 06 May 2015, at 19:43, Markus Straub markus.straub...@gmail.com wrote: Hallo, ich bin für die Verwendung von explizitem Tagging in Kombination mit bicycle_road=yes - so wie sie auch in der Wiki bereits für Deutschland beschrieben ist [1]. Warum? - Das explizite Tagging macht es Anwendungen, denen Fahrradfahren im Prinip egal ist leicht: maxspeed=30 source:maxspeed=AT:bicycle_road vehicle=destination (bzw. vehicle=yes wenn die Durchfahrt durch ein Zusatzschild erlaubt ist - wie es z.B. bei einer Fahrradstraße in Hard in Vorarlberg der Fall ist) bicycle=designated - Das zusätzliche bicycle_road=yes hilft auf das Fahrrad bezogenen Anwendungen wie z.B. Fahrradrouting oder Fahrradkarten. Da ist die Information, dass es sich um eine Fahrradstraße handelt spannend, denn abgesehen von den beschriebenen Eigenschaften ist es auf Fahrradstraßen legal mit dem Fahrrad nebeneinander zu fahren (und ich glaub noch ein paar andere Dinge, die das Radfahren dort angenehmer machen sollen). LG, Markus / evod P.S.: die Hasnerstraße ist keine Fahrradstraße laut StVO, nur eine fahrradfreundliche Straße ohne weitere StVO-Implikationen. P.P.S.: die Hofjagdstraße ist Wiens zweite Fahrradstraße: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316401060 [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle_road On 2015-05-06 18:41, Norbert Wenzel wrote: On 05/06/2015 04:22 PM, Friedrich Volkmann wrote: Für eine Fahrradstraße gilt im wesentlichen: bicycle=designated vehicle=destination maxspeed=30 [...] Bisher dachte ich, Fahrradstraßen gibt es in AT sowieso nur am Papier. Aber nun bin ich in der Kuchelauer Hafenstraße einer leibhaftigen begegnet. Die Hasnerstraße im 16ten sollte auch eine solche sein, wenn ich mich richtig erinner. Nun fragt sich, wie wir solche Straßen taggen wollen. Wenn wir bicycle_road=yes verwenden, sollten wir im Wiki die österreichische Rechtslage ergänzen. Wenn wir mit bicycle_road=yes die Tags bicycle=designated + vehicle=destination + maxspeed=30 implizieren wollen, müssen wir das auch auf http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Austria bzw. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Maxspeed#Austria irgendwie vermerken. Ich denke wir sollte es so explizit wie möglich taggen und (wenn es denn von der StVO her stimmt, das hab ich nicht kontrolliert) zwar so wie du oben beschrieben hast. Es ist ja schon bei den Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkungen eine nette Idee, dass Router irgendwelche nationalen Vorgaben (Ortsgebiet) automatisch auswerten, aber das funktioniert schon da nicht. Ich denke je expliziter wir das an die Straße mappen (ev. zusätzlich das ohnehin ignorierte bicycle_road=yes, oder einen Kommentar) desto verständlicher bleibt das für alle die mit den Daten arbeiten müssen. Norbert ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at
Re: [Talk-GB] Quarterly Project All things delivery-related - an update
That's interesting. Have just tried the app out. It gives you the postboxes in OpenStreetMap but not the ones that are missing (as shown by blue markers on Robert's comparison tool: http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postboxes/ I really do feel like we are missing a trick here. As the map becomes more and more complete it becomes harder and harder to find something to map (example: I spend more time trying to find missing footpaths that I can map on a circular walk now than 2-3 years ago). An app that helps people find what's missing whilst out surveying could really help. I only wish I had the skills and time to do this. Regards, Rob On 6 May 2015 at 11:29, SK53 sk53@gmail.com wrote: Are you aware of the the PostBox Finder https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.elbatrop.postboxeshl=enapp from Elbatrop? I had a quick play with it ages ago, adding some collection times to existing post boxes. Jerry On 5 May 2015 at 23:40, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote: Robert Whittaker has an excellent site http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postboxes/ monitoring OSM data on postboxes in the UK. Here you can see progress (even a league table of who's contributing). From the history graph you can see there's been an increase in activity since the project got going. Perhaps Robert might provide some data analysis about the effect of the project. Enter a postcode and you can find all the missing and incorrect postboxes nearby. Wow there are loads of postboxes still missing. Wouldn't it be great if there was a smartphone app that you could load missing points in to and it would tell you about them as you travel around. It would be like a guide to where to go mapping! Geocaching for postboxes anyone? Rob ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [Talk-it] Aiutino per Wiki Loves Monuments Italia
Cercherò di dare una mano anche io; magari inserendo le coordinate di altri siti, anche fuori Roma; prelevandoli dalle relativi pagine di dettaglio della wiki. Grazie :) Curiosando fra le varie voci già inserite, ho notato che quella che fa riferimento alla La Rinascente di Via Fiume https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Rinascente ha delle coordinate che ci portano da tutt'altra parte; ti risulta? Nel caso, posso effettuare la correzione direttamente? Certamente, è molto più semplice correggere un dato sbagliato piuttosto che segnalarlo e attendere una risposta. Per cui se vedete errori (che sicuramente abbiamo fatto) correggete liberamente. Buona serata Dario Il giorno 6 maggio 2015 18:42, tommasogre...@yahoo.it tommasogre...@yahoo.it ha scritto: Ciao Dario Cercherò di dare una mano anche io; magari inserendo le coordinate di altri siti, anche fuori Roma; prelevandoli dalle relativi pagine di dettaglio della wiki. Curiosando fra le varie voci già inserite, ho notato che quella che fa riferimento alla La Rinascente di Via Fiume https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Rinascente ha delle coordinate che ci portano da tutt'altra parte; ti risulta? Nel caso, posso effettuare la correzione direttamente? Grazie Tommaso Ciao. L'utente Bultro ha da poco modificato il template e adesso è stato tolto GoogleMaps (che non funzionava più, nemmeno su en.wikipedia) e inserito OSM. Per quanto riguarda la compilazione automatica delle tabelle (almeno per quanto riguarda le coordinate) ho chiesto dei pareri sulla possibilità di usare Wikidata. Al momento non sembra ancora possibile, ma se qui c'è qualcuno che sa orientarsi con Wikidata è il benvenuto se vuole provare a modificare il template usato per compilare le tabelle. Intanto grazie per il contributo :-) Dario Il giorno 6 maggio 2015 14:48, Federico Cortese cortese...@gmail.com ha scritto: 2015-05-06 0:42 GMT+02:00 Dario Crespi dario.cre...@gmail.com: Scrivo per chiedere se c'è qualcuno che ha voglia di dare una mano con la redazione delle liste di monumenti fotografabili per l'edizione 2015 di Wiki Loves Monuments Italia. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it Ciao Dario e grazie per la segnalazione. Darò volentieri una mano per quel che riguarda Lecce e zone limitrofe, visto che mancano le coordinate per tutti i siti. Anche se in realtà tutti i siti di Lecce hanno già le coordinate nelle relative pagine di Wikipedia, anche perchè sono collegate alle geometrie di OSM. Le coordinate non possono essere inserite automaticamente in quella tabella? Inoltre il link nel riquadro in alto a destra per visualizzare tutti i luoghi della tabella sulla mappa non funziona per Google Maps mentre è ok per Bing (anche se dalla pagina della Puglia mi mandava in Calabria, ma ho già corretto il link). Ciao Federico ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing listTalk-it@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-it] Aiutino per Wiki Loves Monuments Italia
Ciao Dario Cercherò di dare una mano anche io; magari inserendo le coordinate di altri siti, anche fuori Roma; prelevandoli dalle relativi pagine di dettaglio della wiki. Curiosando fra le varie voci già inserite, ho notato che quella che fa riferimento alla La Rinascente di Via Fiume https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Rinascente ha delle coordinate che ci portano da tutt'altra parte; ti risulta? Nel caso, posso effettuare la correzione direttamente? Grazie Tommaso Ciao. L'utente Bultro ha da poco modificato il template e adesso è stato tolto GoogleMaps (che non funzionava più, nemmeno su en.wikipedia) e inserito OSM. Per quanto riguarda la compilazione automatica delle tabelle (almeno per quanto riguarda le coordinate) ho chiesto dei pareri sulla possibilità di usare Wikidata. Al momento non sembra ancora possibile, ma se qui c'è qualcuno che sa orientarsi con Wikidata è il benvenuto se vuole provare a modificare il template usato per compilare le tabelle. Intanto grazie per il contributo :-) Dario Il giorno 6 maggio 2015 14:48, Federico Cortese cortese...@gmail.com mailto:cortese...@gmail.com ha scritto: 2015-05-06 0:42 GMT+02:00 Dario Crespi dario.cre...@gmail.com mailto:dario.cre...@gmail.com: Scrivo per chiedere se c'è qualcuno che ha voglia di dare una mano con la redazione delle liste di monumenti fotografabili per l'edizione 2015 di Wiki Loves Monuments Italia. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it Ciao Dario e grazie per la segnalazione. Darò volentieri una mano per quel che riguarda Lecce e zone limitrofe, visto che mancano le coordinate per tutti i siti. Anche se in realtà tutti i siti di Lecce hanno già le coordinate nelle relative pagine di Wikipedia, anche perchè sono collegate alle geometrie di OSM. Le coordinate non possono essere inserite automaticamente in quella tabella? Inoltre il link nel riquadro in alto a destra per visualizzare tutti i luoghi della tabella sulla mappa non funziona per Google Maps mentre è ok per Bing (anche se dalla pagina della Puglia mi mandava in Calabria, ma ho già corretto il link). Ciao Federico ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org mailto:Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
[Talk-de] Brunnen : Check tagging near Hannover?
waterway=water_point is defined as a place to fill fresh water holding tanks. There are several marked as Brunnen near Hannover. Could someone check that tagging? http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/9cX ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Re: [Talk-it] Comune di milano usa mappa osm per il routing
Bello! Grazie per la segnalazione. Mirco -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Comune-di-milano-usa-mappa-osm-per-il-routing-tp5843422p5843561.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Re: [Talk-br] TAGs admin_center ou capital ?
Perfeito Blade! Parabéns! Agora cá entre nós, como você consegue fazer tão rápido? Estou aqui como formiguinha fazendo os do Rio de Janeiro. A região norte do Rio estava toda sem o admin_centre. Pelo JOSM vejo a relação que está sem o admin_centre e incluo. Uma por uma. Não baixo uma grande área pelo JOSM até porque o OSM não deixa. Existe alguma maneira mais rápida de se fazer? []s Marcio From: Blademir Andrade de Lima Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2015 9:30 PM To: OpenStreetMap no Brasil Subject: Re: [Talk-br] TAGs admin_center ou capital ? Pronto! Todos os municípios da Bahia estão com admin_center em suas devidas relações. Quando fui verificar a Mesorregião do Nordeste Baiano ela ja estava pronta. Com tantos municípios algum deve ter sido esquecido sem o Admin_center. Att, BladeTC ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Re: [Talk-br] TAGs admin_center ou capital ?
Pronto! Todos os municípios da Bahia estão com admin_center em suas devidas relações. Quando fui verificar a Mesorregião do Nordeste Baiano ela ja estava pronta. Com tantos municípios algum deve ter sido esquecido sem o Admin_center. Att,BladeTC From: thunder...@gpsinfo.com.br To: talk-br@openstreetmap.org Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 19:14:16 -0300 Subject: Re: [Talk-br] TAGs admin_center ou capital ? Aun, mas qual usar? Pergunto porque não cheguei a conclusão alguma do padrão que estamos empregando no Brasil. Alguns inserem na relação boundary o admin_center, outros excluem da relação e em alguns lugares nunca inseriram capital e tampouco admin_centre na relação. Aproveito para parabeniza-lo porque identifico que você formatou todos os municípios do espírito santo com admin_centre nas relações boundarys, entretanto ao norte, na Bahia, a maioria dos municípios tem a relação boundary, mas sem o admin_centre. A nível renderizador nos é fornecido um arquivo resultado de um pré-processamento dos dados OSM extraindo dele as relações boundary com os admin_center delas. Observe um corte do print dessa imagem aberta: Essa imagem pega a área Norte do Espírito Santo e a Sul da Bahia. A cor verde escura nos boudarys significa que aquele boundary não tem a TAG place. A verde clara significa que tem. As cidades que estão como admin_centre da relação boundary são estampadas na cor referente ao tipo de place dela. Tirem suas conclusões. []s Marcio From: Lists Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2015 6:43 PM To: OpenStreetMap no Brasil Subject: Re: [Talk-br] TAGs admin_center ou capital ? Marcio O tag capital tambem e mais antigua que relações, acho esses duas assuntos pode ser levantados no tagging, mas provavelmente eles vai dizer para não usar. Aun Johnsen ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Re: [Talk-br] TAGs admin_center ou capital ?
Eu tava fazendo esse trabalho no país todo, parei por causa do trabalho, mas
era de forma automatizada e com minha supervisão relação a relação para depois
enviar para o osm, o problema é que consegui perder o código que fiz para
realizar essa tarefa, uma pena, pois dava pra fazer o estado todo em alguns
minutos, contando como tempo de supervisão do que foi feito.
Essa consulta pode te ajudar a fazer esse trabalho ai
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/9di
Estava desde ontem fazendo. O método é o seguinte:-Inicialmente baixo uma
pequena porção;-Seleciono o limite que desejo baixar, clico com o botão direito
sobre BAIXAR MEMBROS;-Se o admin_center apareceu tudo bem, parto para o proximo
municipio;-Se não, baixo a Cidade sede, seleciono a relação e adiciono seu
respectivo admin.
Ja fiz de tudo, download automático, etc, fica muito pesado, até que descobri
esta técnica.Preferencialmente pode baixar todos os municípios desejados, e
depois adiciono as admin_center em todos de uma vez.
Att,BladeTC
Em Quarta-feira, 6 de Maio de 2015 22:13, Blademir Andrade de Lima
blademi...@hotmail.com escreveu:
#yiv6100208711 #yiv6100208711 --.yiv6100208711hmmessage
P{margin:0px;padding:0px;}#yiv6100208711
body.yiv6100208711hmmessage{font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri;}#yiv6100208711
Estava desde ontem fazendo. O método é o seguinte:-Inicialmente baixo uma
pequena porção;-Seleciono o limite que desejo baixar, clico com o botão direito
sobre BAIXAR MEMBROS;-Se o admin_center apareceu tudo bem, parto para o proximo
municipio;-Se não, baixo a Cidade sede, seleciono a relação e adiciono seu
respectivo admin.
Ja fiz de tudo, download automático, etc, fica muito pesado, até que descobri
esta técnica.Preferencialmente pode baixar todos os municípios desejados, e
depois adiciono as admin_center em todos de uma vez.
Att,BladeTC
From: thunder...@gpsinfo.com.br
To: talk-br@openstreetmap.org
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 21:49:24 -0300
Subject: Re: [Talk-br] TAGs admin_center ou capital ?
#yiv6100208711 #yiv6100208711 --.yiv6100208711ExternalClass
.yiv6100208711ecxhmmessage P {padding:0px;}#yiv6100208711
.yiv6100208711ExternalClass body.yiv6100208711ecxhmmessage
{font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri;}#yiv6100208711 Perfeito Blade! Parabéns!
Agora cá entre nós, como você consegue fazer tão rápido? Estou aqui como
formiguinha fazendo os do Rio de Janeiro. A região norte do Rio estava toda sem
o admin_centre. Pelo JOSM vejo a relação que está sem o admin_centre e incluo.
Uma por uma. Não baixo uma grande área pelo JOSM até porque o OSM não deixa.
Existe alguma maneira mais rápida de se fazer? []sMarcio From: Blademir Andrade
de Lima Sent: Wednesday, May 6, 2015 9:30 PMTo: OpenStreetMap no Brasil
Subject: Re: [Talk-br] TAGs admin_center ou capital ? Pronto! Todos os
municípios da Bahia estão com admin_center em suas devidas relações. Quando
fui verificar a Mesorregião do Nordeste Baiano ela ja estava pronta. Com
tantos municípios algum deve ter sido esquecido sem o Admin_center. Att,BladeTC
___Talk-br mailing
listTalk-br@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
___
Talk-br mailing list
Talk-br@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
___
Talk-br mailing list
Talk-br@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
[Talk-br] Área de Proteção Ambiental do Planalto Central
Amigos, alguém experiente poderia dar uma olhada na grande Área de Proteção Ambiental do Planalto Central em https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3426617 Pelo visto quebraram a área. []s Marcio___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br
Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] May Meeting (Disabilty Kurb Project)
Brian, will you be there? Which area are you planning to map? By the way, I don't think it has been mentioned on the list yet, but we'll meet today at the Golden Cross Hotel in Bromsgrove: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/443655057#map=18/52.33379/-2.06168 -- Matthijs On 6 May 2015 at 11:20, Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl wrote: Is anyone planning to map the shops in the high street? I think it would be useful if they were added, but personally I'd prefer to come by bike and do some of the suburbs and the industrial estate. I'll also do some tracing in advance. -- Matthijs On 5 May 2015 at 11:19, Andy Robinson ajrli...@gmail.com wrote: I was planning to do a bit in the Blackwell / Burcot areas, assuming I get around to doing some tracing before Thursday. Cheers Andy From: Rob Nickerson [mailto:rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com] Sent: 02 May 2015 19:15 To: Mark Croft Cc: talk-gb-westmidlands Subject: Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] May Meeting (Disabilty Kurb Project) Sounds like an interesting project. Hopefully we'll see you in Bromsgrove on Thursday to discuss this in more detail. Speaking of which does anyone know what the plan is for Bromsgrove. Is there any priority areas that we should focus on or shall I just pick something and meet you in the pub afterwards? Rob On 1 May 2015 at 18:01, Mark Croft mark.croft@gmail.com wrote: Hi The group has been out to bewdley and did a test run of finding curbs. I was not able to join in cos of health problems felling worn out with weather n hayfever. I should really have a go on my own here around my town in redditch. got a stack of photos and a spreadsheet of gps points where there good curbs and so reasonable ones that either steep and hard work to push a manual wheelchair up and others with a reasonable size drop down to the path/road etc etc I need to get some clarification on all the different issues with curbs and come up with some form of coding and label system. first beta version of the map attached (not sure its openstreetmap) i want to know to make a seperate layer of points on top of openstreetmap? does this need to done on custom webpage and having a host etc? I not done any internet programming yet would like the challange but also very time limited too get some sort of beat/demo copy of at least a paper copy of the map of bewdley. Maybe we have a go around bromsgrove on thursday? Is taking photos with embedded gps position enough? I have a friend that can offer me some free website space? ( i am involved in another project called Disability Action Redditch and need to redo there website and i am hoping to put this Curb/Kurb project on there for now - so that should be up soon or at least a frontpage saying that DAR website going live in june/july 2015) mark croft redditch On 15 April 2015 at 19:42, Brian Prangle bpran...@gmail.com wrote: A quick reminder that we're due to meet on Thurs 7 May (Election Night!). Thise of us who were at the April meeting decided from our list on Bromsgrove ( mainly to support mark a new mapper). Pub is the Golden Cross ( A Wetherspoons ) which might be a challenge as it wasn't on the map when we decided Regards Brian ___ Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands ___ Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands ___ Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands ___ Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands
