[talk-au] MapRoulette Challenges

[Horea Meleg]

Hi everyone!

To make OpenStreetMap more navigable and accurate in guidance, Telenav mapping 
team is planning to process available open data and share it with the community 
using MapRoulette Challenges.

For this purpose we extracted from Perth local data, traffic signals which are 
not present in OSM. You can find it here:
?  Perth traffic signals: https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3723

As some of you guys may already know, we created challenges before. Some of 
them are already finished and we thank your involvement and effort. We still 
have many in progress, and if you want to contribute you can find those here:
?  Fix dead ends in Australia & New Zealand: 
https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3256
?  Fix highway flip-flops in Australia & New Zealand: 
https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3257
?  Fix wrong lane count in Australia & New Zealand: 
https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3258
?  Fix highway link type in Australia & New Zealand: 
https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3259
?  Fix one way flip-flops in Australia & New Zealand: 
https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3261
?  Fix ramp destination conflicts in Australia & New Zealand: 
https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3263
?  Fix typos in Australia & New Zealand: 
https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3264
?  Bad tag values for name in Australia & New Zealand: 
https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3316

All necessary information can be found in challenges description. Also, for 
some of them, description contains GitHub tickets for challenges.

We'd love any input and advice!

If you have any questions or comments, please let me/us know.

Thanks!

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

[talk-au] Our work in last two weeks

[Horea Meleg]

Hello all,
As we informed you two weeks ago we started working on Australia editing in 
Canberra, Perth and Melbourne.
If you're curious in what we did, you can find our changesets using these links:
AUS ALL 
https://osmcha.mapbox.com/filters?aoi=22638c89-517b-45b7-889a-749a6d99ffa9
AUS Flagged only 
https://osmcha.mapbox.com/filters?aoi=9a2c90a1-6a45-4bb9-b52b-6f64b99e1cb5

If you have any questions, feel free to ask us.

Best regards,
Horea

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

[talk-au] Editing kickoff Australia Zealand

[Horea Meleg]

Hi everyone!

This is Horea and I am part of the mapping team at Telenav.

To make OpenStreetMap more navigable and accurate in guidance, our mapping team 
is planning to start editing in Australia/New Zealand.

Starting this January until June we will focus on road geometry, road name, 
oneways, signpost, speed limit, lanes and turn lanes in Auckland, Canberra, 
Perth and Melbourne.

This is where you come in! Beside the general OSM mapping guidelines 
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Road_Tagging),
 do you have any local mapping guidelines for us? Also, we appreciate any hints 
regarding available local or government data (besides 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Data_Catalogue) that we might be 
able to us.

We'd love any input and advice!

If you have any questions or comments, please let me/us know. Also, more 
details about our work and plans can be found on Github 
Repository and 
Telenav Wiki Page. We 
will announce specific editing projects on our Github at least two weeks in 
advance.

Our team members are also on the Maptime Oceania Slack, so we can be reached 
there too.

Thanks!

___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

[Talk-us] New MapRoulette challenge

[Horea Meleg]

Hi everyone!
Thank you all for your contribution on our MapRoulette challenges.
We just added a new challenge with adding speed limit in Detroit. We extracted 
speed limit detections from OpenStreetCam and intersected them with existing 
ways in OSM to see where we have a detection, but we don't have speed limit tag 
in OSM.
The challenge can be found here: http://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3170. 
Also, in challenge description there is a GitHub issue with detailed 
instructions.
We still have some old challenges which can be found in this mail thread.
We'd love any input and advice!
If you have any questions or comments, please let me/us know.
Thanks!

From: Horea Meleg
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2018 12:59 PM
To: 'talk-US@openstreetmap.org' 
Subject: New MapRoulette challenges

Hi everyone!
First, a big thank you for all contributors who worked on existing MapRoulette 
Challenges.
Second, we prepared 5 more challenges like the others, but in different areas. 
You can find them here:

  *   Greenville, SC - http://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3085
  *   New Orleans, LA - http://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3086
  *   Albany, NY - http://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3088
  *   Dayton, OH - http://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3090
  *   Phoenix, AZ - http://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3093
There are also some old challenges that you can work on:

  *   Tulsa, OK - http://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3067
  *   Albuquerque, NM - http://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3066

All necessary information can be found in challenges description. Also, 
description contains GitHub tickets for all challenges.
We'd love any input and advice!
If you have any questions or comments, please let me/us know.
Thanks!


From: Horea Meleg
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 2:29 PM
To: 'talk-US@openstreetmap.org' 
mailto:talk-US@openstreetmap.org>>
Subject: New MapRoulette challenges

Hi everyone!
First, a big thank you for all contributors who finished our first MapRoulette 
Challenges.
Second, as we promised, we prepared 4 more challenges like the others, but in 
different areas. You can find them here:

  *   Tulsa, Oklahoma http://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3067
  *   Tucson, Arizona http://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3068
  *   Albuquerque, New Mexico http://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3066
  *   El Paso, New Mexico http://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3065

All necessary information can be found in challenges description. Also, 
description contains GitHub tickets for both challenges.
We'd love any input and advice!
If you have any questions or comments, please let me/us know.
Thanks!



From: Horea Meleg
Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 10:02 AM
To: talk-US@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-US@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: New MapRoulette challenges


Hi everyone!

To make OpenStreetMap more navigable and accurate in guidance, Telenav mapping 
team is planning to process available open data and share it with the community 
using MapRoulette Challenges.

As a starting point we processed Tiger 2017 data, and we extracted ways which 
don't have name in OSM but there is an available name in Tiger. We made two 
challenges, for two different areas:

  *   Jacksonville, Florida 
http://maproulette.org/mr3/admin/project/271/challenge/3041
  *   San Antonio, Texas 
http://maproulette.org/mr3/admin/project/271/challenge/3042



All necessary information can be found in challenges description. Also, 
description contains GitHub tickets for both challenges.

We'd love any input and advice!

If you have any questions or comments, please let me/us know.

Thanks!

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[Talk-us] New MapRoulette challenges

[Horea Meleg]

Hi everyone!
First, a big thank you for all contributors who worked on existing MapRoulette 
Challenges.
Second, we prepared 5 more challenges like the others, but in different areas. 
You can find them here:

  *   Greenville, SC - http://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3085
  *   New Orleans, LA - http://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3086
  *   Albany, NY - http://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3088
  *   Dayton, OH - http://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3090
  *   Phoenix, AZ - http://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3093
There are also some old challenges that you can work on:

  *   Tulsa, OK - http://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3067
  *   Albuquerque, NM - http://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3066

All necessary information can be found in challenges description. Also, 
description contains GitHub tickets for all challenges.
We'd love any input and advice!
If you have any questions or comments, please let me/us know.
Thanks!


From: Horea Meleg
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 2:29 PM
To: 'talk-US@openstreetmap.org' 
Subject: New MapRoulette challenges

Hi everyone!
First, a big thank you for all contributors who finished our first MapRoulette 
Challenges.
Second, as we promised, we prepared 4 more challenges like the others, but in 
different areas. You can find them here:

  *   Tulsa, Oklahoma http://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3067
  *   Tucson, Arizona http://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3068
  *   Albuquerque, New Mexico http://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3066
  *   El Paso, New Mexico http://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3065

All necessary information can be found in challenges description. Also, 
description contains GitHub tickets for both challenges.
We'd love any input and advice!
If you have any questions or comments, please let me/us know.
Thanks!



From: Horea Meleg
Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 10:02 AM
To: talk-US@openstreetmap.org<mailto:talk-US@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: New MapRoulette challenges


Hi everyone!

To make OpenStreetMap more navigable and accurate in guidance, Telenav mapping 
team is planning to process available open data and share it with the community 
using MapRoulette Challenges.

As a starting point we processed Tiger 2017 data, and we extracted ways which 
don't have name in OSM but there is an available name in Tiger. We made two 
challenges, for two different areas:

  *   Jacksonville, Florida 
http://maproulette.org/mr3/admin/project/271/challenge/3041
  *   San Antonio, Texas 
http://maproulette.org/mr3/admin/project/271/challenge/3042



All necessary information can be found in challenges description. Also, 
description contains GitHub tickets for both challenges.

We'd love any input and advice!

If you have any questions or comments, please let me/us know.

Thanks!

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[Talk-us] New MapRoulette challenges

[Horea Meleg]

Hi everyone!
First, a big thank you for all contributors who finished our first MapRoulette 
Challenges.
Second, as we promised, we prepared 4 more challenges like the others, but in 
different areas. You can find them here:

  *   Tulsa, Oklahoma http://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3067
  *   Tucson, Arizona http://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3068
  *   Albuquerque, New Mexico http://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3066
  *   El Paso, New Mexico http://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3065

All necessary information can be found in challenges description. Also, 
description contains GitHub tickets for both challenges.
We'd love any input and advice!
If you have any questions or comments, please let me/us know.
Thanks!



From: Horea Meleg
Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 10:02 AM
To: talk-US@openstreetmap.org
Subject: New MapRoulette challenges


Hi everyone!

To make OpenStreetMap more navigable and accurate in guidance, Telenav mapping 
team is planning to process available open data and share it with the community 
using MapRoulette Challenges.

As a starting point we processed Tiger 2017 data, and we extracted ways which 
don't have name in OSM but there is an available name in Tiger. We made two 
challenges, for two different areas:

  *   Jacksonville, Florida 
http://maproulette.org/mr3/admin/project/271/challenge/3041
  *   San Antonio, Texas 
http://maproulette.org/mr3/admin/project/271/challenge/3042



All necessary information can be found in challenges description. Also, 
description contains GitHub tickets for both challenges.

We'd love any input and advice!

If you have any questions or comments, please let me/us know.

Thanks!

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[Talk-us] New MapRoulette challenges

[Horea Meleg]

Hi everyone!

To make OpenStreetMap more navigable and accurate in guidance, Telenav mapping 
team is planning to process available open data and share it with the community 
using MapRoulette Challenges.

As a starting point we processed Tiger 2017 data, and we extracted ways which 
don't have name in OSM but there is an available name in Tiger. We made two 
challenges, for two different areas:

  *   Jacksonville, Florida 
http://maproulette.org/mr3/admin/project/271/challenge/3041
  *   San Antonio, Texas 
http://maproulette.org/mr3/admin/project/271/challenge/3042



All necessary information can be found in challenges description. Also, 
description contains GitHub tickets for both challenges.

We'd love any input and advice!

If you have any questions or comments, please let me/us know.

Thanks!

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[Talk-ec] Autovias en Ecuador

[Horea Meleg]

¡Hola a todos!
Mientras estábamos mapeando en Ecuador encontramos carreteras mapeadas en OSM 
como autovías (dual carriageways). De acuerdo con las referencias escritas a 
continuación: una carretera debe ser mapeada como una autovía cuando hay un 
separador físico. Pero, en algunos casos, encontramos que no había ningún 
separador físico. Por ejemplo, en este caso:
Location: -0.3825016,-78.1942664
OSC link: http://openstreetcam.org/details/935761/337
[cid:image002.jpg@01D357B2.E4867A90]

Les proponemos la siguiente mejora: cambiar la geometría en vez de autovías 
(dual carriageways) a carreteras individuales en casos como el anterior: 
aproximadamente 91 kms de carretera.
Si tienen algún comentario o duda sobre esta mejora por favor avísennos.
Fuentes
Imágenes a nivel de calle: OpenStreetCam, Mapillary
Referencias
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/5471/when-should-i-divide-a-simple-way-into-dual-carriageway-or-divided-road
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway

¡Gracias!
Horea Meleg
___
Talk-ec mailing list
Talk-ec@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ec

[Talk-ec] Test

[Horea Meleg]

Test
___
Talk-ec mailing list
Talk-ec@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ec

[Talk-us] Mapping turn lanes in dual carriageway intersections

[Horea Meleg]

Hello all,
During our editing work on lanes in Detroit and Phoenix we found some 
interesting situations, usually on intersections with dual carriage way, where 
missing turn:lanes tagging can affect the lane connectivity.
So, in this situation: 42.329625, -83.16889
[cid:image005.jpg@01D3481E.54C260C0]
There is no turn:lane info on the middle way, so there will be no connectivity 
between Way 1 and Way 4 and also Way 3 and Way 2.
Our Map Analyst team mapped lane info based on Mapbox 
initiative<https://blog.mapbox.com/mapping-turn-lanes-in-openstreetmap-5da9bf764f0d>,
 in brief we mapped only where the marking is present on the road. So, on 
middle way from picture above, we didn't add turn:lanes, therefor will be no 
connectivity to left.
We thought about a solution to resolve this issue, and we think that best 
option is to add there turn:lanes:both_ways=left on middle way like this:
[cid:image006.jpg@01D3481E.54C260C0]
So, in future we will map this cases like this.
We'd love any input and advice from you guys. If you have any questions or 
comments, please let me/us know.
You can add comment and share with us your opinion here: 
https://github.com/TelenavMapping/mapping-projects/issues/36. Also, you can 
find more details on that page.


Thank you,
Horea Meleg,
Telenav

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Edits in Phoenix, Arizona

[Horea Meleg]

Hi Greg,
We are editing in Maricopa and Pinal counties area, where we have tiger and 
approved local data. Thanks for all input and advice. We already talked with 
Hans about highway tags when we had some concerns. We talked with some mappers 
in Phoenix about signpost and the tag destination:street, which we used before 
in other areas but in Phoenix it’s not used. Could you give us some pointers: 
why do you not use it? Could we?
Thanks,
Horea Meleg

From: Greg Morgan [mailto:dr.kludge...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 6:01 PM
To: Horea Meleg <horea.me...@telenav.com>
Cc: talk-US@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Edits in Phoenix, Arizona



On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 4:31 AM, Horea Meleg 
<horea.me...@telenav.com<mailto:horea.me...@telenav.com>> wrote:

Hi everyone!

This is Horea and I am part of the mapping team at Telenav.

To make OpenStreetMap more navigable and accurate in guidance, our mapping team 
is planning to start editing in Phoenix.

Do you mean the City of Phoenix or the metro Phoenix area?  There is plenty of 
work to do in both.  However, I'd like your team to stay awhile and work on the 
metro area.  ;-)


In the next weeks we will focus on road geometry, road name, oneways, signpost, 
speed limit, lanes and turn lanes.

This is where you come in! Beside the general OSM mapping guidelines 
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page, 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features), do you have any local mapping 
guidelines for us? Also, we appreciate any hints regarding available local or 
government data that we might be able to us.

We'd love any input and advice!


 On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Martijn van Exel 
<m...@rtijn.org<mailto:m...@rtijn.org>> wrote:
turn restrictions, missing roads (if any), one-way roads, traffic signals, some 
carto features such as parks.

Hans Dekryger is a mapping force.  I think he maps all those features except 
turn restrictions. Hans has done a great job of adding dual carriage ways to 
metro Phoenix.  Most of the turn restriction and traffic flow entries are false 
positives.  I see many no left turns suggestions where a dual carriage way 
comes together. Only a few drivers make the u-turn.  It would be incorrect to 
add those restrictions.

As always we will respect local mappers’ work above everything.
Thank you for your concern.

Sources will be Bing / DG, OpenStreetCam, Mapillary,
 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109740061
Bing is your best bet.  Digital Globe is not even competitive.
If you look at the new ASU Law building, you can see that Bing has the building 
under construction. DG premium show the area as a green parking lot. DG 
standard shows the footing being dug.  DG is great for rural areas but not 
here.  Bing is actual airplane flyovers around 2014 .  The new ESRI imagery is 
newer but it does not let you overzoom.  Bing will still give you tiles to zoom 
20.  ESRI has newer data to zoom 17 and then shows the same DG standard for 18. 
Overzooming only provides white tiles.

ImproveOSM (GPS based detections) augmented with government data where possible 
(which is where Horea’s question came from).



Where possible we will publish MapRoulette / Tasking Manager jobs for anyone to 
participate.
The Phoenix area was hit hard by the chdr changes.  Fredrick lists affected 
streets as Arizona but there are only three small outliers: Yuma, a few along 
Mexico, and Tucson.  The rest were sub-prime rate subdivisions that chdr either 
added the geometry and name or just the name.  The tiger2015 layer is more than 
adequate to cover these names.  I have set all  name tags to 
chdr_USA_AZ_name_fixup_required because the rest of the metro Phoenix are 
pockets.  You can use any number of tools to search and repair the name.  Other 
than this issue I cannot think of any potential MapRoulette challenges.


If you have any (other) specific insights to share, like locally specific 
mapping practices, things on the ground that are different / specific to the 
area, data you’ve worked with, let us know. Thanks!
 Remove all the tiger tags when you are done with a street.  Add surface tags 
and lanes if you can. I use surface tag of dirt verses tracks.  I started using 
the dirt surface tag when the town of Tonopah disappeared on 
http://tripmaker.randmcnally.com/<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http://tripmaker.randmcnally.com/=E,1,rzpWUi00JjPuGMWknxJ0i85WKjQbUYVEnspJfZRdZjUwcFkDcYnSQ1duaa0KfQppv5CWMWwBz-to5dShfqdoS3CihETDBYTunYxBIF7AEgjfy_O0dfY5=1>
 . Tripmaker will let you route over dirt but tracks do not display.

You really cannot use blue tiles like you would else where.  Most all of our 
flood plains are recreation areas such as golf courses, and area mini parks.  
Most of the small neighborhood green looking mini-park areas are dual use.  
They are a catch basin during heavy rains but function as a park.  Here is an 
example 
https://www.mapillary.com

[Talk-us] Edits in Phoenix, Arizona

[Horea Meleg]

Hi everyone!

This is Horea and I am part of the mapping team at Telenav.

To make OpenStreetMap more navigable and accurate in guidance, our mapping team 
is planning to start editing in Phoenix.

In the next weeks we will focus on road geometry, road name, oneways, signpost, 
speed limit, lanes and turn lanes.

This is where you come in! Beside the general OSM mapping guidelines 
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page, 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features), do you have any local mapping 
guidelines for us? Also, we appreciate any hints regarding available local or 
government data that we might be able to us.

We'd love any input and advice!

If you have any questions or comments, please let me/us know.

Thanks!

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[Talk-us] Best practice in Singpost Editing

[Horea Meleg]

Hello all,
Me and my Telenav colleagues are editing Signposts in Detroit area. We were 
wondering which would be the complete information in this case, when a 
secondary(primary) road and a motorway_link intersect - should a 
motorway_junction tag be added?
42.482377, -83.259498

[cid:image001.jpg@01D2FEF6.088BDF40]

Thank you,
Horea
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[Talk-us] Best practice in Lane Editing 2

[Horea Meleg]

Hello all,
Me and my Telenav colleagues are editing lane numbers in Detroit area. We found 
some cases that looks like this (42.43651692568901, -83.51102781049859):
[cid:image001.jpg@01D2E906.C4A4DCA0]
Our question is: what is the central lane used for and how do we map it?
Should we count it as a separate lane and have 3 lanes in this case (one for 
each direction and one for both directions)
[cid:image002.png@01D2E906.C4A4DCA0]
or have only 2, one for each direction?
[cid:image003.png@01D2E906.C4A4DCA0]

Thank you,
Horea Meleg
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[Talk-us] Mapping traffic signals and stop signs using MapRoulette

[Horea Meleg]

Hi all,
Me and my Telenav colleagues found useful open source data for Wayne County 
regarding traffic signals and stop signs. We made a blogpost about this: 
http://blog.improve-osm.org/en/2017/06/mapping-traffic-signals-and-stop-signs-using-maproulette/
 and created two MapRoulette challenges to facilitate the mapping process: one 
for traffic signals http://www.maproulette.org/view/2593 and the other for stop 
signs: http://www.maproulette.org/view/2564. Our team will start mapping 
traffic signals and everyone who is keen on mapping is welcomed to help us with 
any of the challenges.
Thank you,
Horea
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[Talk-us] Signpost editing in Detroit

[Horea Meleg]

Hello all,
While editing signposts in Detroit, my Telenav collegues and I found some 
inconsistencies in the OSM data, and we were wondering how to manage them. The 
cases we encountered are on our github page, at the comments section : 
https://github.com/TelenavMapping/mapping-projects/issues/1. Any opinion on 
this matter would be very useful for us.
Thank you
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Best practice in Lane Editing

[Horea Meleg]

Hy Paul,
Thanks for your reply. Can you give us an example of how exactly you’re 
approaching this, to understand better (some coordinates maybe).
Also can you please tell us how you think our presented case, should be 
processed:
[cid:image003.jpg@01D2BF4B.C520A8B0]



From: Paul Johnson [mailto:ba...@ursamundi.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 9:04 AM
To: Horea Meleg <horea.me...@telenav.com>
Cc: Rihards <ric...@nakts.net>; Hans De Kryger <hans.dekryge...@gmail.com>; 
talk-US@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Best practice in Lane Editing



On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 4:19 AM, Horea Meleg 
<horea.me...@telenav.com<mailto:horea.me...@telenav.com>> wrote:
Hy guys, thanks for your responses.
Do you think that is better to move motorway_junction where continuous line 
begins? In real life you can't cross a continuous line, so I think it should be 
the same in OSM. What do you think?

Does anybody have objections on me updating that approach with my method?  I 
tend to start a new lane where the lane taper finishes, start a split at the 
start of the theoretical gore (placement=transition on the exit), and start the 
ramp centerline at the bullnose.  For solid line situations, the US is a little 
weird on this.  A single solid white line is officially a "discouraged" 
movement one should make only with extreme caution, whereas crossing a 
double-white line is prohibited, as outlined in the MUTCD.  In either case, I 
would generally take the conservative approach in this situation, using 
something like change:lanes=yes|yes|yes|not_right|no where that solid line is.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Best practice in Lane Editing

[Horea Meleg]

Hy guys, thanks for your responses.
Do you think that is better to move motorway_junction where continuous line 
begins? In real life you can't cross a continuous line, so I think it should be 
the same in OSM. What do you think?

Thanks,
Horea

-Original Message-
From: Rihards [mailto:ric...@nakts.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 11:05 AM
To: Hans De Kryger <hans.dekryge...@gmail.com>; Horea Meleg 
<horea.me...@telenav.com>
Cc: talk-US@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Best practice in Lane Editing

On 2017.04.25. 09:50, Hans De Kryger wrote:
> The motorway link should be dropped down to 2 where the lane actually 
> starts

between 1 & 2 for sure.

> *Regards,**
> *
> 
> *Hans*
> 
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Horea Meleg <horea.me...@telenav.com 
> <mailto:horea.me...@telenav.com>> wrote:
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> Me and my Telenav colleagues started to edit lane numbers in Detroit
> area. We met lots of cases where highway_link starts exactly at the
> junction of roads. For example, this case here: 42.474427,
> -83.155894.
> 
> 
> 
> Do you think it is ok to leave motorway_junction as it is already
> mapped and add lanes=5 between 1 and motorway_junction, or you
> consider it’s better to move it in position 1 or 2 and add lane
> number on motorway and motorway_link accordingly.
> 
> __ __
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Horea Meleg
> 
> __ __
> 
> __ __
> 
> 
> ___
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
> 


--
 Rihards
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Editing tasks in Detroit

[Horea Meleg]

Hello Charlotte,
We started working on 8 counties near Detroit: Wayne, Macomb, Oakland, 
Livingston, Washtenaw, Lenawee, Monroe and Genesee.
Thank you for your interest in helping us.
Horea

From: Charlotte Wolter [mailto:techl...@techlady.com]
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 1:09 AM
To: Horea Meleg <horea.me...@telenav.com>; talk-US@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Editing tasks in Detroit

Horea,

The photo on the Goithub page is Haggerty Road, which is pretty far 
west of downtown. I'm surprised that it even is inside the city limits. Do you 
have any guidance on which areas need mapping?

Charlotte



At 11:12 PM 4/20/2017, you wrote:

Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 
boundary="_000_CY1PR07MB238031FD132A64B72884026AED1A0CY1PR07MB2380namp_"

Hi all,
My Telenav colleagues in our mapping team are starting new mapping projects in 
the Detroit area. We are planning some pretty extensive improvements in areas 
like (turn) lane information, road naming and geometry, oneway and turn 
restrictions. We opened a Github repository where we describe each project in 
more detail: https://github.com/TelenavMapping/mapping-projects/issues . You 
can find out more about editing practices and sources we use there. We very 
much welcome discussion and suggestions there, or just get in touch via talk-us 
or OSM message.

Horea Meleg

___ Talk-us mailing list 
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org<mailto:Talk-us@openstreetmap.org> 
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Charlotte Wolter
927 18th Street Suite A
Santa Monica, California
90403
+1-310-597-4040
techl...@techlady.com<mailto:techl...@techlady.com>
Skype: thetechlady
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[Talk-us] Editing tasks in Detroit

[Horea Meleg]

Hi all,
My Telenav colleagues in our mapping team are starting new mapping projects in 
the Detroit area. We are planning some pretty extensive improvements in areas 
like (turn) lane information, road naming and geometry, oneway and turn 
restrictions. We opened a Github repository where we describe each project in 
more detail: https://github.com/TelenavMapping/mapping-projects/issues . You 
can find out more about editing practices and sources we use there. We very 
much welcome discussion and suggestions there, or just get in touch via talk-us 
or OSM message.

Horea Meleg

___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us