n the case of sidewalks) and the
current appropriate schema is, "this is a blank area of the map with no
data".
On Sun, Mar 3, 2019 at 11:22 AM Andy Townsend wrote:
> On 03/03/2019 18:43, Nick Bolten wrote:
> > As I mentioned, I'm aware of hacks regarding sidewalks
>
> I wo
ieczny
wrote:
>
>
>
> Mar 3, 2019, 8:20 PM by ajt1...@gmail.com:
>
> On 03/03/2019 18:43, Nick Bolten wrote:
>
> As I mentioned, I'm aware of hacks regarding sidewalks
>
>
> I wouldn't describe sidewalk=none as a hack - speaking as someone who
> walks a
As I mentioned, I'm aware of hacks regarding sidewalks - though I can
absolutely guarantee that strategy is insufficient, particularly when the
issue is, "this non-expert mapper needs to know what work has been done
more easily" (I've tried using those tags many, many times). This issue
will occur
I like the idea of having information indicating the lack of certain
features, when necessary - such as the geometry with a note on it about
what not to map. It would be great if it could be done more formally, for
purposes of QA, such as how the construction tags work for buildings,
streets, etc
I'd like to second this! Also, hi Melanie!
In case it adds useful context, I'd like to give my own recommendations:
(1) get practice in mapping sidewalks yourself and (2) create an IP,
metadata, work, verification, and upkeep plan for the import.
For (1), the goal is to become familiar with the
Hello everyone! This is Nick Bolten with the OpenSidewalks group. By some
oversight, I wasn't subscribed to talk-us, and since the system is based on
mailing lists (in 2018) that means I can't jump into the previous thread to
help clear things up, so I'm making a new post.
First, the title
6 matches
Mail list logo
