Hi Florian
I invite you to make comments on the OpenStreetMap forum (
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12) because there's more
Dutch mappers active there. Awaiting your input there, I'll already do a
short reply to you,
or a couple of years i have been to Zeeland in Autumn and as
Hoi allemaal,
Waar kan ik op OSM of andere plaatsen pijpleidingen vinden die in de
driehoek Houten-Lunetten-Bunnik lopen?
Dank,
Pander
___
Talk-nl mailing list
Talk-nl@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nl
Hallo Pander,
Op de risicokaart van de overheid staan grote buizenleidingen:
[1]http://nederland.risicokaart.nl/?ext=132613,446676,147776,45
5506thema=default.
Ik weet toevallig ook dat de Gasunie een bodeminformatiekaart
beheerd, maar ik weet niet of deze voor particulieren
toegankelijk is.
Anyway this is not doing anything positive for my feelings on imports.
In terms of having data for a routing engine (like OsmAnd) a definition can
be that any missing address in a country is an error. The number of missing
addresses in the Netherlands is calculated recently: on a total of approx.
You'll beat us on numbers, that's true.
Maybe the problem that I see is not so much the imports, but the
maintenance of all that data (imported or manually added).
Who is going to see all those mistakes, changes, etc. when all the data is
there ? The one that I saw was a building in a forest.
On 2014-10-05 20:58, Marc Gemis wrote:
You'll beat us on numbers, that's true.
Maybe the problem that I see is not so much the imports, but the
maintenance of all that data (imported or manually added).
Who is going to see all those mistakes, changes, etc. when all the
data is there ? The one
For maintenance, the way we do it now doesn't work IMHO. At least not with
only a handful of (40-50) mappers in both Belgium and The Netherlands. We
can't keep up with the changes.
IMHO The amount of work to add new data is approx. the same as verifying
and keeping it up to date.
I wonder how
Hi Johan,
On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 04:49:15PM +0200, Johan C wrote:
Hi Florian
I invite you to make comments on the OpenStreetMap forum (
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12) because there's more
Dutch mappers active there. Awaiting your input there, I'll already do a
short
On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 07:49:52PM +0200, Marc Gemis wrote:
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Johan C osm...@gmail.com wrote:
The BAG should contain the correct building outline, since this is
Cadastral information, nowadays updated very often. But as any database,
the BAG might
On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 09:39:31PM +0200, Marc Gemis wrote:
For maintenance, the way we do it now doesn't work IMHO. At least not with
only a handful of (40-50) mappers in both Belgium and The Netherlands. We
can't keep up with the changes.
IMHO The amount of work to add new data is approx.
Marc, I agree with Maarten. Let's hope that our address data helps users
appreciate OSM apps more. And that these apps are smart enough to draw more
users into mapping.
You have a good point on maintenance versus the number of mappers. On the
BAG data it's luckily quite simple: thousands of paid
Hi Florian,
The quality issues you mentioned about the imported data is due to the
rules by which the government has collected this data.
For example: the tiny forests from the 3dShapes import (not the AND
import) also appear on the topographical maps. I've examined way
74390172 as an
On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 10:36:23PM +0200, Johan C wrote:
Hey Florian
That's a building which will be opened this December:
http://dagvandebouw.nl/waar/zeeland/nieuwbouw-42-zorgappartementen-svrz-middelburg/
The BAG uses various statuses: the building will be measured after it's
finished,
Hi Florian
2014-10-05 22:43 GMT+02:00 Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de:
On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 10:36:23PM +0200, Johan C wrote:
Hey Florian
That's a building which will be opened this December:
http://dagvandebouw.nl/waar/zeeland/nieuwbouw-42-zorgappartementen-svrz-middelburg/
The BAG
Florian, I missed a question:
2014-10-05 22:43 GMT+02:00 Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de:
On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 10:36:23PM +0200, Johan C wrote:
Hey Florian
That's a building which will be opened this December:
After 3.5 years and 34.000 addresses, I have to admit that an import is the
only way to get addresses in OSM fast.
But is the conclusion that we have to make that a crowed-sourced model for
map making failed ? That we have to move to an import of third-party
databases model ? One were the source
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Frank Steggink stegg...@steggink.org wrote:
Regarding the highway = unclassified tag from the AND import: this was
before my time, but I believe it was caused by a lack of granularity of the
highway types in the original data.
No, the issue was an incorrect
17 matches
Mail list logo
