one? Some of the
ways in them have already been "connected up" by Mapbox's data people
(see e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467178965) so it'd be good to
know that what they joined up actually existed.
Best Regards
Andy Townsend (from OpenStreetMap'
re.
In order to do that, can anyone think what might be the best way to
contact whoever would have run the OSM session in which this user
uploaded that changeset? If we can work out want went wrong we can fix
it for next time, whether it's a JOSM bug or something procedurally that
needs changing.
s his edits. He's now blocked, but
he's not going to stop until he gets a longer block.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 6:39 PM Jherome Miguel
wrote:
-- Forwarded message -
From: *Jherome Miguel*
Date: Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-ph] "Open Pai
On 16/01/2022 06:41, Jherome Miguel wrote:
Anyone monitoring this new user, "Open Paint Maps"? This one's
suspicious, not only for its username that is obviously deceptively
similar to the OSM name, but this is also messing with roads in
various places. Just undid or fix some of this one's
(especially, changeset comments from other mappers) I'm sure
that someone from the DWG will pick it up.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, from the Data Working Group
*1 visible at the time of writing. Some of their diary entries have
already been hidden.
*2 t
On 27/06/2019 15:41, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
Thank you for this notice. I have reverted the changeset you
mentioned. While I am a bit too far away to confirm on-the-ground, I
have tried to confirm or research online any news about any supposed
"future expansion" of the shopping mall
On 27/06/2019 15:18, maning sambale wrote:
Yes we aware of this issue, we are tracking it here:
https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/50
Thanks. It'd be good if there was a link to that from changeset
discussions rather than just a hashtag :)
Does this need me to revert this change
likely, have created
another sock-puppet account that hasn't been noticed yet).
Various people within the community have reverted previous edits in the
past; just checking whether this one needed to be done too.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
ing
from there.
Although we do get some vandals who create lots of accounts this is
relatively rare in OSM, once actual human beings starting explaining to
people why they shouldn't add rubbish to OSM they usually stop.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend,
On 30/06/2020 08:15, maning sambale wrote:
After reviewing the edits and communicating with the mapper, we
decided to roll-back all edits related to this issue due to
incompatible source.
We plan to do this as a local community. Please see the plane here
for comments and suggestions:
10 matches
Mail list logo
