Re: [talk-ph] Suggesting removing names from expressway ramps (but keep on junction nodes)

[Ian Lopez via talk-ph]

I personally prefer to retain exit/interchange names from expressway ramps but 
I have no problem with moving such names to motorway junctions.

Aside: Are we the only country that has exit/interchange names on expressway 
ramps?

Regards,

Ian Lopez

-
Blog: http://ianlopez1115.wordpress.com/
OpenStreetMap/Twitter: ianlopez1115
Facebook: ian.lopez 

On Sunday, November 3, 2019, 6:40:22 AM GMT+8, Jherome Miguel 
 wrote:  
 
 I am suggesting removing exit/interchange names from expressway ramps 
(highway=motorway_link), so that the underlying destination info can be used 
for routing, while the common exit name (without the "Exit/Interchange" suffix) 
will be retained in the exit location node (highway=motorway_junction). This 
mapping will allow retaining the exit name on the map (as with the norm in the 
Philippines), while allowing destination info to be used for the router. 
Do anyone are okay about this? Further questions or 
comments?___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
  ___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph

[talk-ph] Suggesting removing names from expressway ramps (but keep on junction nodes)

[Jherome Miguel]

I am suggesting removing exit/interchange names from expressway ramps
(highway=motorway_link), so that the underlying destination info can be
used for routing, while the common exit name (without the
"Exit/Interchange" suffix) will be retained in the exit location node
(highway=motorway_junction). This mapping will allow retaining the exit
name on the map (as with the norm in the Philippines), while allowing
destination info to be used for the router.

Do anyone are okay about this? Further questions or comments?
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph