Re: [talk-ph] Potentially problematic edits

2019-06-27 Thread Andy Townsend
On 27/06/2019 15:41, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: Thank you for this notice. I have reverted the changeset you mentioned. While I am a bit too far away to confirm on-the-ground, I have tried to confirm or research online any news about any supposed "future expansion" of the shopping mall

Re: [talk-ph] Potentially problematic edits

2019-06-27 Thread maning sambale
Hi Andy, Yes we aware of this issue, we are tracking it here: https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/50 On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 9:00 PM Andy Townsend wrote: > > Hello, > > Do the changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71374826 look > OK to everyone? See >

Re: [talk-ph] Potentially problematic edits

2019-06-27 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
Hi Andy, Thank you for this notice. I have reverted the changeset you mentioned. While I am a bit too far away to confirm on-the-ground, I have tried to confirm or research online any news about any supposed "future expansion" of the shopping mall including in real estate forums and I did not

Re: [talk-ph] Potentially problematic edits

2019-06-27 Thread Andy Townsend
On 27/06/2019 15:18, maning sambale wrote: Yes we aware of this issue, we are tracking it here: https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/50 Thanks.  It'd be good if there was a link to that from changeset discussions rather than just a hashtag :) Does this need me to revert this change

[talk-ph] Potentially problematic edits

2019-06-27 Thread Andy Townsend
Hello, Do the changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71374826 look OK to everyone?  See http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=9248920 for previous comments on this user's changesets.  They're currently blocked until they engage with the community (or more