Re: [talk-ph] Potentially problematic edits
On 27/06/2019 15:41, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: Thank you for this notice. I have reverted the changeset you mentioned. While I am a bit too far away to confirm on-the-ground, I have tried to confirm or research online any news about any supposed "future expansion" of the shopping mall including in real estate forums and I did not find any news about any expansion plans (aside from an outdated news article back in 2012). This, together with the blocked user's habit of doing unverified/wrong edits, means that we should revert their changes as a precaution. Thanks - I'd agree with that approach in this case. Best Regards, Andy ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Potentially problematic edits
Hi Andy, Thank you for this notice. I have reverted the changeset you mentioned. While I am a bit too far away to confirm on-the-ground, I have tried to confirm or research online any news about any supposed "future expansion" of the shopping mall including in real estate forums and I did not find any news about any expansion plans (aside from an outdated news article back in 2012). This, together with the blocked user's habit of doing unverified/wrong edits, means that we should revert their changes as a precaution. Regards, Eugene On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 9:00 PM Andy Townsend wrote: > Hello, > > Do the changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71374826 look > OK to everyone? See > http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=9248920 for > previous comments on this user's changesets. They're currently blocked > until they engage with the community (or more likely, have created > another sock-puppet account that hasn't been noticed yet). > > Various people within the community have reverted previous edits in the > past; just checking whether this one needed to be done too. > > Best Regards, > > Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. > > > > > ___ > talk-ph mailing list > talk-ph@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph > ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Potentially problematic edits
On 27/06/2019 15:18, maning sambale wrote: Yes we aware of this issue, we are tracking it here: https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/50 Thanks. It'd be good if there was a link to that from changeset discussions rather than just a hashtag :) Does this need me to revert this change or is someone else going to do it? Best Regards, Andy ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
Re: [talk-ph] Potentially problematic edits
Hi Andy, Yes we aware of this issue, we are tracking it here: https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/50 On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 9:00 PM Andy Townsend wrote: > > Hello, > > Do the changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71374826 look > OK to everyone? See > http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=9248920 for > previous comments on this user's changesets. They're currently blocked > until they engage with the community (or more likely, have created > another sock-puppet account that hasn't been noticed yet). > > Various people within the community have reverted previous edits in the > past; just checking whether this one needed to be done too. > > Best Regards, > > Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. > > > > > ___ > talk-ph mailing list > talk-ph@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph -- cheers, maning -- "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden https://github.com/maning http://twitter.com/maningsambale -- ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
