Chris,
Thanks for putting up that table. Looks great. I have two suggestions:
I think the network identifiers should be simpler. What about this scheme?
Interstate = Interstate signed highway system
US = US signed highway system
[state abbr.] = State signed highway system
TX = Texas
CA =
A couple thoughts:
1) Commercial data providers have use a route type parameter that designates
something as an Interstate, Federal Highway, State Highway, County Road, or
Farm-to-Market road. This code does not distinguish between states; all state
highways have the same route type.
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
Alan Brown writes:
3) There should be a place for people to contribute highway shields -
as metadata.
To make life even more interesting, New York State renders placenames
in the Adirondack Park using beige on brown,
Yeah we're getting a little ahead of ourselves with the shields. The first
step is tagging the highways in a standard scheme which would give a
renderer sufficient data to draw shields. Then someone has to actually
build a renderer that draws the shields. Thats a whole other can of worms.
I
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Zeke Farwell ezeki...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah we're getting a little ahead of ourselves with the shields. The first
step is tagging the highways in a standard scheme which would give a
renderer sufficient data to draw shields. Then someone has to actually
Sorry meant to send to all...
-- Forwarded message --
From: lordsu...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 16:56:48 -0600
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] US Route Tagging With Relations
To: Zeke Farwell ezeki...@gmail.com
Personally I think it's best to let the renderer be as stupid as
6 matches
Mail list logo
