It's pretty bonkers. Anyone is welcome to join the LWG call each week or read
the minutes, and be as involved as you like.
License changes will always throw up people who don't like it, and the LWG has
been going through peoples legitimate and illegitimate concerns for two years I
think it's
On May 11, 2010, at 5:20 PM, Chris Hunter wrote:
Well, between the new links on the map and today's WIKI edit, it looks like
the Brits have decided to shove the ODbL down our throats after all. I have
major philosophical issues with the way the license change is being handled,
and feel
Minutes for SOTM US run out in March
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_United_States/US_SOTM#Weekly_calls
There aren't any sponsors to speak of?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_United_States/US_SOTM/Sponsorship
The server is still blank?
http://openstreetmap.us/
It's been pointed out that there is a SOTM US website, but it's mostly empty
right now:
http://stateofthemap.us/
This wasn't even linked from the wiki, I fixed that.
There is a phone call tomorrow which I guess uses the same details that have
been advertised for last month:
There is a new site at http://www.sotm.us, I need to switch the DNS
of stateofthemap.us to point at it as well. Thank you for updating
the wiki.
Kate
On May 12, 2010, at 2:16 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
It's been pointed out that there is a SOTM US website, but it's
mostly
so it's happening? cool.. can you fill in what's happened with the lack of
minutes?
On May 12, 2010, at 12:24 PM, Kate Chapman wrote:
There is a new site at http://www.sotm.us, I need to switch the DNS of
stateofthemap.us to point at it as well. Thank you for updating the wiki.
Kate
the LWG
has been going through peoples legitimate and illegitimate concerns for
two
years I think it's been now. We've had lawyers checking everything at
every
step of the way.
I personally just want to say thank you to the license working group for
taking on the thankless job of
On 5/12/10 10:19 AM, SteveC wrote:
It's pretty bonkers. Anyone is welcome to join the LWG call each week or read
the minutes, and be as involved as you like.
License changes will always throw up people who don't like it, and the LWG
has been going through peoples legitimate and illegitimate
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
SteveC wrote:
I am being careful to only delete objects that have not been
touched since I created them - roads, portions of the TN River,
etc... Please respect my wishes and do not undelete these objects.
Hi,
Anthony wrote:
What if a new contributor reverts it? Would the revert then be
considered ODBL?
A revert is an edit like any other.
What does that mean?
It means that the legal situation in the following two cases is exactly
the same:
1) A creates road; B edits
On May 12, 2010, at 5:30 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
SteveC wrote:
I am being careful to only delete objects that have not been
touched since I created them - roads, portions of the TN River,
etc... Please respect
On 13 May 2010 02:32, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Anthony wrote:
What if a new contributor reverts it? Would the revert then be
considered ODBL?
A revert is an edit like any other.
What does that mean?
It means that the legal situation in the following
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 01:39 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Terribly thought out process. Terrible idea in the first place.
IMHO the terrible idea was to start out with CC-BY-SA in the first
place; had we simply been PD all along, nobody would have made a fuss
and we could have saved
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
this change is pretty
much necessary for OSM to achieve its goals. my new employer runs all
this stuff through their lawyers; they would probably not approve the
CCBYSA and probably would approve the new license, as
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
Some very smart lawyers at very big companies in the US
and in law schools also based on what i read on web
claim that PD doesn't really exist,
as Congress has mangled our laws, that seems to be the state here now:
Copyright
As seen on Twitter.
From @yellowbkpk
OpenStreetMap mapping party scheduled for 2pm June 12 at the Walker
Library in Uptown. #osm http://plancast.com/a/354t
If you are within a few hours drive to MSP, you should go. Join the
fun at a mapping party. Collaborate with other mappers and meet some
16 matches
Mail list logo
