On 9/15/2011 10:19 PM, Anthony wrote:
Also, I couldn't find any such sign going in the other direction.
Even if this were access=destination, it would be a unidirectional
access=destination.
If you go the other direction you have to either pass through the main
gate on World Drive or pass one
* Anthony o...@inbox.org [2011-09-15 22:19 -0400]:
Incidenally, for some reason Lulu-Ann put the example of customer
parking lots in the wiki for access=destination, but I'd say this
completely changes the original intent of access=destination. Only a
few months ago the wiki said
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
As I've said on the wiki, I'd rather see
access=restricted plus access:restriction=customers_only, this way we
can give routers general information (that the way is restricted to a
particular category) without having them
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote:
The US doesn't seem to have the strict legal categories for rights-of-way
that the UK does
I'm not sure what you mean by that, as I'm not familiar with UK law.
But the US definitely has a concept of public right of way vs.
Sorry the issue was we did not have quorum and did not announce the
meeting. So it could not count as the annual meeting. The
Treasurer's report is finished (a big part of these sorts of things)
and we can have an annual meeting.
Anyway, the plan was to have an online annual meeting, which is
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Kate Chapman k...@maploser.com wrote:
Sorry the issue was we did not have quorum and did not announce the
meeting. So it could not count as the annual meeting. The
Treasurer's report is finished (a big part of these sorts of things)
and we can have an annual
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 11:10 -0500, Brad Neuhauser wrote:
Towns appear at zoom level 9 in Mapnik, which seems pretty decent to
me. There are tagged towns in SW Kansas that show up, but some
villages probably need retagging to towns in the N and W. The
Place page recommends tagging county
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Val Kartchner val...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that this is also the time to add a development level to the
place key. There are so many place names that aren't hamlets but are
developments (like subdivisions) that have names. This could include
the name of
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Let's keep this more brainstormy and less discuss-y and debate-y
for now, okay?
Trim and add your ideas to the list for your reply. We'll come back
around for discussion later. ;-)
A few of us were just asking on irc
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Let's keep this more brainstormy and less discuss-y and debate-y
for now, okay?
Trim and add your ideas to the list for your reply. We'll come back
* Val Kartchner val...@gmail.com [2011-09-16 10:49 -0600]:
I think that this is also the time to add a development level to the
place key. There are so many place names that aren't hamlets but are
developments (like subdivisions) that have names. This could include
the name of an apartment
On 09/16/2011 03:37 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
I'd like to figure out a way to start working collaboratively on
getting a style started. Has anyone tried to collaboratively work on a
style file before? Is there anyone interested in working with on it
with me? I was thinking about firing up a
Anthony o...@inbox.org writes:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote:
The US doesn't seem to have the strict legal categories for rights-of-way
that the UK does
I'm not sure what you mean by that, as I'm not familiar with UK law.
But the US definitely has a
13 matches
Mail list logo