Hi all,
The final phase of the license changeover to the Open Database
License[1] from our current CC-BY-SA is drawing near. From April 1[2],
current OpenStreetMap data will only be available under the new
license. This means that all data that was contributed by those who
did not agree to the
On 1/13/2012 10:49 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
* Remap data that remains at risk of being removed, following the
guidelines on the wiki (see links below).
Assuming that the April 1 delete is a smart delete, is it better to wait
until afterward? I'm thinking of this -
1 TIGER - agreer
2
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
On 1/13/2012 10:49 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
* Remap data that remains at risk of being removed, following the
guidelines on the wiki (see links below).
Assuming that the April 1 delete is a smart delete, is it better to
On 1/13/2012 12:39 PM, Peter Dobratz wrote:
I agree that it makes more sense to clean up the map after the deletes
from the license change have taken affect.
Except that the April Fools change will not preserve a lot of the
additions (if a non-agreer splits a way, and you add a maxspeed, how is
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
There are several things we can do together to minimize the data loss
and ensure a smooth changeover to the new license:
* Contact mappers who have declined or not agreed yet.
I've heard this theme over and over again,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Peter Dobratz pe...@dobratz.us wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
On 1/13/2012 10:49 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
* Remap data that remains at risk of being removed, following the
guidelines on the wiki (see links below).
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Peter Dobratz pe...@dobratz.us wrote:
[ ... ] it makes more sense to clean up the map after the deletes from
the license change have taken affect.
I disagree. It's always better to go mapping than to not go mapping.
That's the core value of OSM; improve the
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Peter Dobratz pe...@dobratz.us wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
On 1/13/2012 10:49 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
* Remap data that remains at risk of being removed, following the
guidelines on the wiki (see links below).
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I will even pre-emptively delete stuff that I know would otherwise get
deleted automatically, because that way I am in control, I see what happens,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:44:30PM -0700, Martijn van Exel wrote:
I do that too. There is of course a small chance of the decliner
changing his or her mind, so I only delete data that is tainted by a
decliner that I have personally been in touch with about the license
change and my best
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:44:30PM -0700, Martijn van Exel wrote:
I do that too. There is of course a small chance of the decliner
changing his or her mind, so I only delete data that is tainted by a
decliner that I have
On 1/13/2012 4:50 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Speaking of, has anyone talked to balrog-kun yet? I know he was at
one point insanely prolific and I often stumble across his data, he's
currently a decliner.
I don't have a clue what the below statement means, since he hasn't
said he'll make his
If you really want to understand this you will need to ask a lawyer. or start a
discussen on talk-legal
to me it looks like some political game and splitting hairs about some of the
CT details. Considering balrog-kun has a new account where CT is accepted and
this declaration then all the
On 13 January 2012 22:50, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:44:30PM -0700, Martijn van Exel wrote:
I do that too. There is of course a small chance of the decliner
changing his or her mind, so I only delete data that is tainted by a
decliner that I have
On 14 January 2012 01:19, Andrew Cleveland evil.salt...@gmail.com wrote:
So every TIGER way in the western US will require the odbl=clean tag?
No, the bot edits are assumed by LWG to not deserve protection, plus
additionally all the related changesets are on Frederik Ramm's
whitelist which I
15 matches
Mail list logo
